Sebastien, It's a -0 for me. If it's important to do, sure. --Alex
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:54 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Removing TAGS > > > On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > What does it achieve? Tags don't cost anything. The code came from Citrix. > Removing the TAGS is not going to take that away. > > > > That's true they don't cost a thing, but anyone looking at the tags and not > knowing the history will get confused between cloudstack and cloudplaftorm > and will get confused between version numbers. > > I actually think it's almost a case of branding and that we need to protect > the > cloudstack brand. At the very least, if you want to keep the tags we should > rename them to avoid confusion. > > -sebastien > > > I like having git metadata in case I need to go find something really old or > understand where the code made its fork. It doesn't happen often but I do > like having the information if I need it. > > > > --Alex > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > >> Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2014 5:41 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Removing TAGS > >> > >> Please do - obviously retain anything that is tied to an ACS release; > >> but it's a version control system - delete tags boldly. :) > >> > >> > >> --David > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> When I look at the tags on git, there are a bunch of Citrix specific tags. > >>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tags > >>> > >>> Can we clean those up ? > >>> > >>> I don't see why we need a TAG_CLOUDPLATFORM_2.2.15_GA2 > >>> > >>> -sebastien > >>> > >>>
