Review Request 15508: Make sure that if the file does not exist an Exception is thrown and that once it exists it is also closed after the properties are loaded.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15508/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cloudstack-git

RE: [4.3][QA]Test Plan for Hyper-V support

> -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:10 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [4.3][QA]Test Plan for Hyper-V support > > Hi, > > > 2) VM's with Multiple guest networks > Covered under multiple physica

Re: Retreive VM snapshot size

Hello, thanks a lot for your reply. I need this value to inform customers about how mutch they are spending. i'm able to retreive this value from usage but i need it real time. Best Regards. Il 13/11/2013 19:14

Re: access to jenkins.buildacloud.org

Done. emailed the passwd to you On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:25:55AM +, Srikanteswararao Talluri wrote: > ?talluri? is my committer id. > > Thanks, > ~Talluri > > On 14/11/13 10:29 am, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > > >On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:45:41PM +, Srikanteswararao Talluri > >wrot

[ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review, probably followed by a revamp (?). Can we have some volunteers who are familiar with various upgrade paths comment on it ? Me and Radhika will try to consolidate those comments, snippets and fix the RN for 4.2.1. -abhi RN=

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review, probably followed by a revamp (?). Can we have some volunteers who are familiar with various upgrade paths comment on it ? Me and Radhika will try to consolidate those comments, snippets and fix the RN for 4.2.1. -abhi RN fo

CloudStack 4.2 web interface is not responding during handling big logs

Hello Cloudstack community, During last week on CloudStack 4.2 I have seen following issue: CloudStack web interface is not responding in browser. So, I looked to server side for determining what's going on. # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.4 (Final) top - 03:09:43 up 8 days, 14:59,

Re: access to jenkins.buildacloud.org

Thanks Prasanna. On 14/11/13 1:59 pm, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >Done. emailed the passwd to you > >On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:25:55AM +, Srikanteswararao Talluri wrote: >> ?talluri? is my committer id. >> >> Thanks, >> ~Talluri >> >> On 14/11/13 10:29 am, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >>

Re: Review Request 15507: CLOUDSTACK-4835: Update global configuration test cases failed in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#review28862 --- api/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanner.java

RE: access to jenkins.buildacloud.org

Hi David, Please create account for me also. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley Subject: Re: access to jenkins.buildacloud.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at

Re: Review Request 15507: CLOUDSTACK-4835: Update global configuration test cases failed in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/ --- (Updated Nov. 14, 2013, 9:15 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Re: Review Request 15507: CLOUDSTACK-4835: Update global configuration test cases failed in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/ --- (Updated Nov. 14, 2013, 9:25 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congratulations Sanjeev. -- - Rajani -Original Message- From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi mailto:sateesh%20chodapuneedi%20%3csateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com%3e>> Reply-to: To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org mailto:%22...@cloudstack.apache.org%22%20%3c...@cloudstack.apache.org%3e>> Subject: RE: Ne

Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

welcome Sanjeev and good luck. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Congratulations Sanjeev. > > -- > - Rajani > > > -Original Message- > From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi > mailto:sateesh%20chodapuneedi%20%3csateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com%3e>> > Reply-to: > To: dev@clou

Coverage Analysis: Few Issues

Team, While running code coverage analysis with sonar for integration tests, based upon the errors thrown, i could see the below issues\notes with CS project. Issue1: The coverage tool is complaining about duplicate sources for below files. These are available with same name under folders ./

RE: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Hi, The master has the most up-to-date RN for 4.2.1. From: Abhinandan Prateek Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:22 PM To: CloudStack Dev Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath Subject: Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review, probably followed by a r

Review Request 15512: patch to support install and uninstall Hyperv agent as windows service

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15512/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Repository: cloudstack-git D

Review Request 15476: fix for Invalid SMTP breaks HA (master and 4.3)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15476/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Likitha Shetty. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4959 htt

Review Request 15513: CLOUDSTACK-5166: Fixed test script issue related to egress rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15513/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Review Request 15514: CLOUDSTACK-5168: Fixed test script issue related to SSH command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15514/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: [JENKINS] rpmbuilder running out of space

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:38:43PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Just an fyi: > > The rpmbuilder* slave on jenkins.bacd is running low on space. I've > cleaned out the workspaces of old jobs (build-4.1/4.2 etc) which > haven't been running for a month to regain space. But I'm trying to > add

Re: Question regarding ServerApiException

That makes perfect sense for regular users. I’ll look into fixing the error messages for storage provisioning (which is only for root admins). Unless there are any objections, I’ll also override ServerApiException’s getMessage() and getLocalizedMessage() to return getDescription(). -Chris -- C

Re: Review Request 15362: Fixed issue with detail view fields marked as 'isPassword' not being obfuscated

Bumping this. Can someone take a look at it, please? -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Chris Suich wrote: > > ---

Review Request 15516: CLOUDSTACK-5169: Egress rules - Improved assertion code related to SSH to avoid assertion error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15516/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: Review Request 15516: CLOUDSTACK-5169: Egress rules - Improved assertion code related to SSH to avoid assertion error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15516/ --- (Updated Nov. 14, 2013, 1:53 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Anyway we can wait next week to release. quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a hackathon session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path etc…then test…. I'd recommend keeping the vote open until then. -sebastien On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Radhika Puthiyet

Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:29:31AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjeev > Neelarapu to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have > accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contrib

Re: Retreive VM snapshot size

Hi, I would recommend you fill out a JIRA ticket with all your details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK Thanks! On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Antonio Petrocelli < a.petroce...@netsons.com> wrote: > Hello, > > thanks a lot for your reply. > > I need this value to inform cu

RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congratulations Sanjeev! Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:15 PM To: dev Subject: Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu welcome Sanjeev and good luck. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Rajani Karu

Re: Retreive VM snapshot size

On 13.11.2013 11:51, Antonio Petrocelli wrote: Hello, someone knows how to obtain the size of a VM snapshot with CLOUDSTACK 4.2 API? with this call _http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/domain_admin/listVMSnapshot.html_ size is not specified. This seems to be a known problem,

[DOCS] 4.2.1 Release Notes rework

I'm kicking off the thread to discuss the work that's needed for the 4.2.1 Release Notes. Radhika has asked for help getting the 4.2.1 RN updated and Alok and I have volunteered so far to help out. Sebastian has asked to hold off on the release until after the Amsterdam meet up which would prov

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:42:11AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Anyway we can wait next week to release. > > quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a hackathon > session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path etc…then test…. > > I'd recommend keeping the v

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I am almost +1 on this. If we can at least give the RC to people at ccc. Not having a new package to show off next week is a missed opportunity. How about trying to close the vote on wednesday night?? If no bylaws forbid it. We will then be releasing ACS while release notes are still dripping

Re: Retreive VM snapshot size

yes, same issue for vm snap also. Thanks Il 14/11/2013 16:37, Nux! ha scritto: On 13.11.2013 11:51, Antonio Petrocelli wrote: Hello, someone knows how to obtain the size of a VM snapshot with CLOUDSTACK 4.2 API? with this call _http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/domain_admi

RE: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I agree completely. I've spent the last couple of evenings trying to get a KVM lab upgraded from 4.1 to 4.2.1 by registering the new template first using the name in the upgrade*.java, and I've had zero success getting the SSVM to come back up. However, if I don't install the new template prior

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 04:49:26PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I am almost +1 on this. If we can at least give the RC to people at > ccc. Not having a new package to show off next week is a missed > opportunity. > > How about trying to close the vote on wednesday night?? If no > bylaws forbi

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I think that's an acceptable middle ground. I would prefer to have the artifacts to test the upgrade procedures with and with a designated committer to review, commit and release the docs as progress is made we should all be able to call this approach a win. I've yet to get any kind of environm

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Ok, i don't want to press for a release. We'll see (i think we are at +2 binding???) @Travis: You can find a link to the artifacts in the vote thread. regards, On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Travis Graham wrote: > I think that's an acceptable middle ground. I would prefer to have the > artif

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:06:41PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Ok, i don't want to press for a release. We'll see (i think we are at > +2 binding???) 1 - mine

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

+1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems) On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Marcus, > > Just summarising your concerns so that they can be followed upon: > 1. Due to a VR script change a restart of VR is required. This should be > noted down in

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

you are right, I now casted a vote and we are at +2 (I had a tentative +1 before pending some tests:) On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:06:41PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> Ok, i don't want to press for a release. We'll see (i think we are at >>

Review Request 15521: Fixed issue with DataStoreDrivers not being able to throw meaningful errors

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15521/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Mike Tutkowski. Repository

Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congrats Sanjeev !! On 14/11/13 7:30 AM, "Somesh Naidu" wrote: >Congratulations Sanjeev! > >Regards, >Somesh > > >-Original Message- >From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:15 PM >To: dev >Subject: Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu >

Re: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congratulations, Sanjeev. -min On 11/14/13 9:14 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: >Congrats Sanjeev !! > >On 14/11/13 7:30 AM, "Somesh Naidu" wrote: > >>Congratulations Sanjeev! >> >>Regards, >>Somesh >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Thur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Yeah, I understand that 4.2.0 had a lot of post-release work needed. We are unable to create VPNs. This is reported second hand from one of my admins. He seems to think that it was caused by the following, which added a for loop inside a for loop. The error is: 'com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.My

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Sorry, that should read 'unable to create VPCs'. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Yeah, I understand that 4.2.0 had a lot of post-release work needed. > > We are unable to create VPNs. This is reported second hand from one > of my admins. He seems to think that it was c

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I am good with this as we can get some meaningful results out of the hackathon session. Will provide any assistance required to collect good documentation on upgrades, RN etc. -abhi On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Anyway we can wait next week to release. > >quite a few of us w

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Not sure if Alex Huang checked this, but can anyone help to resolve this? Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Alex Ough wrote: > It sounds a little scary... > > I looked at the history and found these. > > 8/9/ : file moved to engine by Alex Huang > 9/16 : '_mgmtServer.getExecut

Re: Review Request 15362: Fixed issue with detail view fields marked as 'isPassword' not being obfuscated

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15362/#review28893 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On Nov. 8, 2013, 8:33 p.m., Ch

RE: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Unless there are objection to the RC, I would prefer to have it released and make the announcement sooner and showcase in collab conference. As Chip mentions docs were broken out separately anyway. Animesh On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Anyway we can wait next week to rele

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us. I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor shape. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Unless there are objec

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I agree - announcing a release prior to docs availability hurts the project because users fail in installation and upgrades. The gate in my mind is docs readiness - thats an integral part of the release process, even if the repo is separate. Animesh, whats your reason to want to push this out earl

4.3 System VM Templates

Where are these located? The path shown in the docs does not resolve for me. Doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudStack Path: http:// jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvmte

Re: 4.3 System VM Templates

On a related note, when does the vm_template table in the DB get updated with the new paths? On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Where are these located? The path shown in the docs does not resolve for > me. > > Doc: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I can't imagine there not being some guideline or rule about providing documentation in the apache foundation. Can we even release without docs, not that we should. My idea was that we release on wednesday with the docs in rc state. Even that is, admitted, dubious. mobile biligual spell checker us

RE: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

It will still take us couple of day to work on release announcement if the VOTE passes. Can we finish up docs in that timeframe? Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:50 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Seb

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

There is absolutely no ASF rule or policy on this. It's up to projects to decide things like "what's in the release". On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I can't imagine there not being some guideline or rule about providing > documentation in the apache foundation. Can we ev

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Yes - no rule. That said, there is common sense. Releasing without docs doesn't make a lot of sense. I am still trying to understand the urgency of releasing. --David On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > There is absolutely no ASF rule or policy on this. It's up to > projects

Trunk interface to VM

Is there a way to assign a trunked interface to a VM running in CS? Like assign the entire guest interface. We have a use case where we need to run XenServer hosts within a cloudstack managed infra. Thanks! Francois

RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Congratulations Sanjeev! -Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu Congratulations Sanjeev! Regards, Somesh -Original Mess

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #1801

See Changes: [sheng.yang] Make com.cloud.network.vpn.RemoteAccessVpnService an extensible type [nitin.mehta] CLOUDSTACK-5176: [sudison] Add a new method on datastoredriver: getCapabilities, which will be called by liststo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Marcus: Is this is a -1? I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for me (though I haven't tried VPC). I am somewhat concerned about what appears to be drifting away from adhering to semver. (features appear to have made it into the 4.2.1 release that weren't in 4.2.0) a

Re: Coverage Analysis: Few Issues

Hi Will, Could you check on Palo Alto's duplicate api commands? They suppose to be merged as one command I think. BTW, how can this works? Did it broke SRX? --Sheng On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Santhosh Edukulla < santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote: > Team, > > While running code coverag

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Is it possible that devs who missed the cutoff for 4.2 simply put it into 4.2.1? That is the feature was 90% done / tested, but missed. On 11/14/13 4:58 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >Marcus: > >Is this is a -1? > >I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for >me (though I h

Re: CloudStack.next

+1 to IAM. An Autoscale service independent of Netscaler. I'd like to see the built-in GRE controller fully fleshed out as a distributed/cross-AZ virtual network provider. Make it the out-of-the-box virtual network provider instead of VLAN. Easier service vm insertion into virtual networks. Better

Re: Coverage Analysis: Few Issues

Yes, I will look into the naming of the API commands in the Palo Alto plugin. When you say 'they are supposed to be merged as one command', what do you mean? These were the commands that I exposed. Palo Alto firewall commands addExternalFirewall=1 deleteExternalFirewall=1 listExternalFirewa

bf22f6dfe reverts commit 1762dbbb

I've reverted 1762dbbb as it seems to have introduced ConfigurationParameterScope which didn't exist causing builds to fail on master. Thanks, -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Yes, I'd say that upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.2.1 needs to work. On Nov 14, 2013 5:58 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > Marcus: > > Is this is a -1? > > I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for > me (though I haven't tried VPC). I am somewhat concerned about what > appears to

Review Request 15566: Remove the comparison between GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE and guestOSCategory.getName() to make OS category of 'None' to be a valid option.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15566/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4969 https://issues.apache.

RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu

Thank you all for the wishes!! -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 5:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Sanjeev Neelarapu Congratulations Sanjeev! -Sangeetha -Ori

Re: Review Request 15513: CLOUDSTACK-5166: Fixed test script issue related to egress rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15513/#review28933 --- Commit 868e944bf1194f0e54f08b02677b2ada66bfc9cf in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15513: CLOUDSTACK-5166: Fixed test script issue related to egress rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15513/#review28934 --- Commit 3c4d4cc03bbecc1141cea521449529a04ed27360 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15513: CLOUDSTACK-5166: Fixed test script issue related to egress rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15513/#review28935 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On Nov. 14, 2013, 11:46 a.m

Re: Review Request 15513: CLOUDSTACK-5166: Fixed test script issue related to egress rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15513/#review28936 --- Commit c653f0eb150f3fd47d12ce72489a872de21de204 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15513: CLOUDSTACK-5166: Fixed test script issue related to egress rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15513/#review28937 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On

Re: Review Request 15514: CLOUDSTACK-5168: Fixed test script issue related to SSH command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15514/#review28938 --- Commit 1106116b48cdb253046462c2d9d483b63876a740 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15514: CLOUDSTACK-5168: Fixed test script issue related to SSH command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15514/#review28939 --- Commit 0a02c7e1474d12fb494e6938d5e67018790c2bd2 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15516: CLOUDSTACK-5169: Egress rules - Improved assertion code related to SSH to avoid assertion error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15516/#review28943 --- Commit b87f675f4abb9abff91b87dff5c6a087407427df in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15514: CLOUDSTACK-5168: Fixed test script issue related to SSH command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15514/#review28940 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On

Re: Review Request 15514: CLOUDSTACK-5168: Fixed test script issue related to SSH command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15514/#review28941 --- Commit b178d0645418faa947c414be4241e01657dcadb4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15516: CLOUDSTACK-5169: Egress rules - Improved assertion code related to SSH to avoid assertion error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15516/#review28942 --- Commit 9410423555d81f9da1c579f8d3c86b448bb9fee3 in branch refs/heads

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #1802

See

Re: Review Request 15516: CLOUDSTACK-5169: Egress rules - Improved assertion code related to SSH to avoid assertion error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15516/#review28944 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On

Re: Review Request 15516: CLOUDSTACK-5169: Egress rules - Improved assertion code related to SSH to avoid assertion error

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15516/#review28945 --- Commit 6ac099e44c576b70e99779b6c14d1e38d6d6c95d in branch refs/heads

[4.3][QA]Test Plan for Service Monitoring tool in Virtual Router

Hi, I have created a high level test plan for service monitoring tool in Virtual Router: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Service+monitoring+tool+in+Virtual+Route I have mentioned the use cases under the "Test Scenarios" section as one liners. Will be developing test cases

[ACS421] Closing Resolved defects

Below are the defects which are fixed in 4.2.1 but not validated. Can you pl take few min to review fix done and close these defects Reporter Total Grand Total77 angeline shen6 Sailaja Mada 6 Prachi Damle 4 Rayees Namathponnan4 Sheng Yang

Re: Review Request 15507: CLOUDSTACK-4835: Update global configuration test cases failed in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#review28946 --- Commit c29cd9d3c72e119dc74ee7070c08fc6d88dbdf05 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15507: CLOUDSTACK-4835: Update global configuration test cases failed in master

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#review28947 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Nov. 14, 2013, 9:25 a.m., Har

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Marcus, I am trying to understand the upgrade issue that you are facing. It seems there were changes during various rounds of RC that we had for 4.2.0 . The fix that you have mentioned in the email actually got introduced in the 4.2 GA. So someone upgrading to 4.2 GA will not have that constrai

Review Request 15569: CLOUDSTACK-5179: Fixed test script issue related to detach volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15569/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Ok, that may be my fault as I've got various 4.2.0 systems built from testing various RCs. I just chose one and tried to upgrade it. Thanks for clearing that up. On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Marcus, > > I am trying to understand the upgrade issue that you are fa

Review Request 15570: CLOUDSTACK-5180: Increasing the timeout for uploading volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15570/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. S