I can't imagine there not being some guideline or rule about providing documentation in the apache foundation. Can we even release without docs, not that we should. My idea was that we release on wednesday with the docs in rc state. Even that is, admitted, dubious.
mobile biligual spell checker used Op 14 nov. 2013 22:50 schreef "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us>: > I agree - announcing a release prior to docs availability hurts the > project because users fail in installation and upgrades. > The gate in my mind is docs readiness - thats an integral part of the > release process, even if the repo is separate. > > Animesh, whats your reason to want to push this out earlier? > > --David > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Chip Childers <chipchild...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting > > during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us. > > I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor > > shape. > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Unless there are objection to the RC, I would prefer to have it > released and make the announcement sooner and showcase in collab > conference. As Chip mentions docs were broken out separately anyway. > >> > >> Animesh > >> > >> > >> On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>>Anyway we can wait next week to release. > >>> > >>>quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a > >>>hackathon session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path > >>>etcŠthen testŠ. > >>> > >>>I'd recommend keeping the vote open until then. > >>> > >>>-sebastien > >>> > >>> > >>>On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath > >>><radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> The master has the most up-to-date RN for 4.2.1. > >>>> > >>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek > >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:22 PM > >>>> To: CloudStack Dev > >>>> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath > >>>> Subject: Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> It seems the upgrade section of release notes will require a review, > >>>>probably followed by a revamp (?). > >>>> Can we have some volunteers who are familiar with various upgrade > >>>>paths comment on it ? > >>>> Me and Radhika will try to consolidate those comments, snippets and > >>>>fix the RN for 4.2.1. > >>>> > >>>> -abhi > >>>> > >>>> RN for 4.2.1 = > >>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git;a=tree;f > >>>>=re > >>>>lease-notes;h=8128d62c39236331492f3642914bf97b43ed2670;hb=refs/heads/4 > >>>>.2 > >>>> > >>> > >> >
