Re: Review Request 12224: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12224/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 7:06 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review22650 --- Your change seems fine. Did you regression test it? Or did you solv

Re: Review Request 12098: Add PCI Passthrough to CloudStack on KVM Hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 7:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

Re: Review Request 12185: Remove dependency on backport-util.concurrent, and just use built in classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12185/#review22651 --- changes seem fine. Did you test-run the thing? - daan Hoogland On

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

ok, If any of those seem fine to me, should I hit ship it? I can not submit! On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:30:57PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Is this request of yours still valid? happy to do a review or a half. > > Yes please, stil

Re: DevCloud2 problem

On Jul 1, 2013, at 8:45 PM, CK wrote: > I’m having some problems deploying DevCloud2 and wonder if you could help > please. I would like to build the Cloudstack source in DevCloud2 and run > everything from within the DevCloud2 VM. So far I have done the following, > any idea what can be causing

Re: Review Request 12207: Cloudstack-3299 incorrect arguments sent to the script createIpalias in case of vmware, Cloudstack-3240 corrected a mistake in the script name.

> On July 2, 2013, 6:26 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Has this been tested ? I did not test the fix, I don't have access to the vmware setup as of now. - bharat --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: ht

Re: Review Request 12207: Cloudstack-3299 incorrect arguments sent to the script createIpalias in case of vmware, Cloudstack-3240 corrected a mistake in the script name.

> On July 2, 2013, 6:28 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Also for two bug fixes submit different reviews or if they are duplicate > > mark these as such. linked the issues - bharat --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To r

Re: In-Development Release Naming

On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > John, > > If I understand you, we will call master x.(y+1) with x.y being the latest > unpatched release unless we decide that it is not going to be x-compatible > anymore. We will publish x.(y+1) as some symbolic name, possibly reflecting > a

RE: Master build problem

So my vm for CSMan had 2GB RAM, but because it was only a 16GB disk, no swap partition had been created. I created a 1GB swap file and now the setup completes and I can log in Thanks Hugo/Prasanna. Is there any documentation around memory requirements for the CloudStack management serve

Re: In-Development Release Naming

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > To me, codenames are confusing . I'd rather see a clear message like "we > are bumping the release number to version x.y because of this major > feature…." than start talking about a " "gammaray" pre-RC dev release that > will later mayb

Re: In-Development Release Naming

On 7/2/13 10:22 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguenwrote: To me, codenames are confusing . I'd rather see a clear message like "we are bumping the release number to version x.y because of this major feature…." than start talking about a " "gammaray"

Re: Master build problem

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:04:54AM +, Paul Angus wrote: > Is there any documentation around memory requirements for the > CloudStack management server(s) as the requirement has obviously > gone up since 4.1... I'm afraid so, after the introduction of Spring the memory footprint has increased a

Re: Review Request 12205: message(s) made more identifying for the error location

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, > > If any of those seem fine to me, should I hit ship it? I can not > submit! You can hit Ship it with your comments where applicable. That's good indication for another committer to proceed with the push to the repo. -- Pras

Re: Review Request 12185: Remove dependency on backport-util.concurrent, and just use built in classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12185/#review22654 --- Ship it! Ship It! - daan Hoogland On June 29, 2013, 2:34 a.m., D

Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: [GSoC] Updates

On 6/27/13 6:56 AM, Shiva Teja wrote: Hi Rohit, On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: - Have search features right from beginning of your work. For ex. implement something to search all fields on a table, make the head of the table sortable. Have Lucene integration, which wo

Re: DevCloud2 problem

To start off with I did allocate 2048 MB RAM and hit the problem, I then increased the RAM to 4096 and still not working. On 2 July 2013 08:29, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jul 1, 2013, at 8:45 PM, CK wrote: > > > I’m having some problems deploying DevCloud2 and wonder if you could help >

Re: DevCloud2 problem

On 7/2/13 11:10 AM, CK wrote: To start off with I did allocate 2048 MB RAM and hit the problem, I then increased the RAM to 4096 and still not working. maybe you can check your maven options, check: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch And the

Review Request 12229: Fixing script issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12229/ --- Review request for cloudstack, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri and Prasanna Santhanam.

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > Can you add the following logging configuration in your log4j > configuration in your automation run: > > > > Should we start including this in the default categories on the cloudstack installations fro

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:11:26PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: > > Hi Prasanna, > > > > Can you add the following logging configuration in your log4j > > configuration in your automation run: > > > > > > > > > Should w

Review Request 12230: Cloudstack-3168: test_network.py. Fixed two test cases.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12230/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

Re: Review Request 12229: Fixing script issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12229/#review22656 --- Ship it! 479f89c - Prasanna Santhanam On July 2, 2013, 9:38 a.m.

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Hello Prasanna, While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules test from smoke. But while going through various iterations on the review board this hunk to remove test from smoke was dropped. The same test is now included in component. I think we should remove test_a

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review22657 --- Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

> On July 2, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes to > > load. This would definitely be useful. Here's the screen grab over RDP demonstrating the issue http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVCMSlBPX0E Because we use tomc

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > Hello Prasanna, > > While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules > test from smoke. But while > going through various iterations on the review board this hunk to remove test > from smoke was dropped

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > For the following two test failures: > > - > integration.smoke.test_affinity_groups.TestDeployVmWithAffinityGroup.test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup > >It looks to be some issue with

Re: Review Request 12230: Cloudstack-3168: test_network.py. Fixed two test cases.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12230/#review22659 --- Ship it! b8d876fff806e33e859016c252bd208c1ea28c2d - Prasanna Santh

CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

When (approximately) will the videos be uploaded of the collab conference? Looking forward to some talks. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:04:49PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > Hello Prasanna, > > > > While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules > > test from smoke. But while > > going through various i

[DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

tldr: should ldap passwords be cached within cloudstack? Hi Guys, I wanted to get your opinion on something. I seen a JIRA ticket for adding support for multiple LDAP because if the single LDAP server fails you lose access to your Cloudstack console. I plan to add support for multiple ldap server

[GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

Hi, I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports behavior driven development style of testing with criteria broken down into given, when, then. I h

Re: [GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

On 7/2/13 2:28 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: Hi, I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports behavior driven development style of testing with criteria br

RE: London CloudStack Meetup on July 4th

Definitely going to catch the digest version of CloudStack Collab. Note that the new location since last quarter's meeting. DL > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: 01 July 2013 8:28 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lo

Re: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > When (approximately) will the videos be uploaded of the collab > conference? Looking forward to some talks. > +1 Me too > > -- > Prasanna., > > > Powered by BigRock.com > >

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Sebastien, Actually, you are completely correct. When we cut a release branch, we know the scope of change and can apply of the semantic versioning rules to service the correct version number (i.e. whether to increment x, y, or z). However, we have a 4 month period of development on feature r

Re: [DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:58:06PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote: > tldr: should ldap passwords be cached within cloudstack? > > Hi Guys, > > I wanted to get your opinion on something. I seen a JIRA ticket for > adding support for multiple LDAP because if the single LDAP server > fails you lose access t

Re: [GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

The framework promises good things. Just a little warning; there are a lot of frameworks for testing. Let's not have a jungle of them in. If it does something very good that is not done by the present ones go ahead. But what about testng and fixture and xmlunit and htmlunit and All do things v

RE: In-Development Release Naming

+1 to use code name during dev cycles and name the version for GA release for reasons outlined by John B. When querying metrics also would help to identify which defects are logged pre release and which came in post release i.e GA. -Original Message- From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Sudha, In JIRA, is it possible to change an exist release name? If so, we use the code name until the release is cut, and change the JIRA release name to x.y.z (codename) which would make tracking consistent throughout the cycle. Otherwise, as part of the branch creation process, we could cre

Re: [GSoC] Unit testing with Spock

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there would be any objections to using Spock for > writing unit tests for a plugin instead of junit and mockito. > > Spock is JUnit under the hood but an excellent DSL. It supports > behavior driven developmen

Re: DevCloud2 problem

Added the following and it sprung to life: export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms512m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m" Thanks On 2 July 2013 10:20, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > On 7/2/13 11:10 AM, CK wrote: > >> To start off with I did allocate 2048 MB RAM and hit the problem, I then >> incre

RE: In-Development Release Naming

Yes - it can be changed in JIRA unless some workflow is set up not to do that in ACS. However I think we can leave the defects logged before release with codename. I do not see a reason that they should be moved to version number post GA. -Original Message- From: John Burwell [mailto:j

Re: [DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

> A user should probably be tied to a specific authenticator (IMO only), > so that there isn't a backdoor option for getting them into the > system. This is an issue I have come across too. With the way the authenticators are implemented it would be very easy for a user to keep their account despi

ACS development

Hi I am new to ACS development and intend on using DevCloud2 as my self contained dev+test environment. I have the management server running in VirtualBox and have browsed the ACS website/wiki and not found answers to the following questions and hope you can help: 1) Where can I find the manageme

Re: In-Development Release Naming

Sudha, I think it would make tickets easier to comprehend for the casual project contributor/follower. Additionally, the reality is that all tickets don't get closed during the development cycle. As I think through it, changing the JIRA release name when cut the branch to "x.y.z (codename)" w

Re: London CloudStack Meetup on July 4th

Cannot attend this, as i stay in india. On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Definitely going to catch the digest version of CloudStack Collab. > > Note that the new location since last quarter's meeting. > > DL > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mail

Re: ACS development

Hey CK, On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:21 PM, CK wrote: > Hi > > I am new to ACS development and intend on using DevCloud2 as my self > contained dev+test environment. I have the management server running in > VirtualBox and have browsed the ACS website/wiki and not found answers to > the following qu

Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #575

Test Run: #575 Total:94 Fail :9 Skip :2 name passfailskip test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 test_affinity_groups/

Re: event bus details

Patch submitted. https://reviews.apache.org/r/12223/ Things that still need to be thought through: 1. Should the async command event type be a column on async job (and be an attribute of AsyncJobVO)? 2. Should getInstanceId and getInstanceType of AsyncCmd be abstract instead of implemented wit

Re: Review Request 12224: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12224/#review22663 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On July 2, 2013, 7:06 a.m

Re: Review Request 12224: Cloudstack-3313 Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in IPV6 network

> On July 2, 2013, 3:09 p.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Ship It! The patch needs to be rebased. - Abhinandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12224/#review22663 ---

RE: In-Development Release Naming

I definitely understand the easy aspect to carry over defects to version number for committers and contributors. But we should triage them and move them to future or next release and get ready for GA. That is one of GA readiness tasks. Below is simple workflow to explain the reason what I am r

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22666 --- Rajesh, Can you re-upload patch again. Diff is showing following err

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22665 --- Rajesh, Can you re-upload patch again. Diff is showing following err

Re: [DISCUSS] [GSoC] Caching of password on Cloudstack side

On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: >> A user should probably be tied to a specific authenticator (IMO only), >> so that there isn't a backdoor option for getting them into the >> system. > > This is an issue I have come across too. With the way the > authenticators are implemented it

RE: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

The issue is that, this patch is dependent on the review https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/ . I had kept that dependency while creating the review request. First this patch should be committed https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/ and then the current patch. Thanks Rajesh Battala From: Sateesh C

RE: Review Request 12227: NPE wile deployVM in kvm due to capacityIops

Hi Sateesh, For this patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/ it is dependent on https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/ . It is already committed by Edison in 4.2 only. Thanks Rajesh Battala > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, Ju

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Prasanna, this category is already added in log4j-cloud.xml.in. Thanks for taking care of this. -min Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:43 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: >> Hi Prasanna, >> >>Can you add the following logg

qemu-kvm not required by cloudstack-agent rpm package?

So I just installed a new 4.1.0 instance and found that qemu-kvm isn't installed when the agent is. Is this by design or did we accidentally omit this? Unless someone tells me otherwise, I will plan on fixing this prior to 4.1.1 However, in 4.2, we have the situation with LXC now entering the fold

ACS plugins

Hi, Are UI plugins implemented/deployed differently to other types such as API, Storage or Networking plugins (reside under /cloudstack/plugins) I am looking at writing a UI plugin, browsing the wiki I have come across this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Plugin+Tu

Re: ACS development

Thanks Rohit. I found vmops.log under src, I assume that is the management server log? In DevCloud2, is the command to run the management server: mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run but this does not run in the background, can I add & to make it so, or is there another command I should be using to

Review Request 12232: CLOUDSTACK-3324: Fix/Improve upgrade system vm templates 41 to 42

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12232/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOU

Review Request 12233: CLOUDSTACK-3324: Fix/Improve upgrade system vm templates 41 to 42 (Stable master Patch)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12233/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOU

Re: Review Request 12232: CLOUDSTACK-3324: Fix/Improve upgrade system vm templates 41 to 42

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12232/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 4:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

help needed

Hello Everyone, I am completely new to cloudstack, to be more precise I am completely new to how these cloud services work. How should I begin with this? Moreover I have to give a project proposal on a project on cloudstack, for which I need to start with it. Thank You Gaurav

Re: Reg: System vm template and upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2

I think making it mandatory is good due to following: 1. The guestOS version is upgraded over time the support for old OSes may be withdrawn, a this point I do not have exact dates on those though. 2. We are bundling Hypervisor tools onto the system Vms and with dynamic scaling they will work seam

Re: Reg: System vm template and upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2

Additionally ipv6 support is also there in newer templates apart from several performance related enhancements. On 02/07/13 10:18 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >I think making it mandatory is good due to following: > >1. The guestOS version is upgraded over time the support for old OSes may >b

RE: Secondary Storage/TinyLinux

I debugged this to another symptom of secondary storage VM network connectivity problem. (The Ready state of the template was "No"). Thanks, -Soheil From: Devdeep Singh [devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:59 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache

RE: ACS plugins

Please see my comments inline and shoot any queries you may have with UI plugins - Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ACS plugins Hi, Are UI plugins implemented/deployed d

RE: help needed

CloudStack 101? https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-101.html > -Original Message- > From: gaurav jain [mailto:tashan1...@yahoo.com] > Sent: 02 July 2013 5:29 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: help needed > > Hello Everyone, > I am completely new to cloudstack, to

Re: ACS development

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:45 PM, CK wrote: > Thanks Rohit. > > I found vmops.log under src, I assume that is the management server log? > +1 > > In DevCloud2, is the command to run the management server: mvn -pl > :cloud-client-ui jetty:run > but this does not run in the background, can I add &

Re: ACS plugins

Hi Pranav, To keep things simple, I have exactly followed the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Plugin+Tutorial but it did not work :-( I have DevCloud2 running with ACS 4.1 pulled in via git. The /ui/plugins folder did not exist so I created it and followed the wiki

RE: ACS plugins

Hello, >> I have DevCloud2 running with ACS 4.1 pulled in via git. You'll want to make sure you are on either the master or 4.2 branch for UI plugins to work, since they didn't exist on 4.1 or earlier. -Brian -Original Message- From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22673 --- Commit deaf10cad22a8fcf42663276df66365dea1ee3c7 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22675 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On June 28, 2013, 9:23 a.m., Rajes

RE: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos

Mark mentioned up to 3 weeks.. > -Original Message- > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Rohit Yadav > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:08 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack Collab 2013 - videos > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5

Re: Review Request 11992: CLOUDSTACK-2571 ZWPS issues with Enabling/Clearing the Maintenance State of the Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/#review22680 --- Commit 2bc4cbf9fb20ff770ea672815886e2c6d9cb8276 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22679 --- Commit d660bc7e8da57d94049d55e53ffe18df8016e4e5 in branch refs/heads

Re: qemu-kvm not required by cloudstack-agent rpm package?

Hi, On 07/02/2013 06:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: So I just installed a new 4.1.0 instance and found that qemu-kvm isn't installed when the agent is. Is this by design or did we accidentally omit this? Unless someone tells me otherwise, I will plan on fixing this prior to 4.1.1 Checked the Deb

Async Job / Event Bus issue

I've found a bug that I am having trouble determining the cause. Basically, my instance_type and instance_id columns are showing up when the job is submitted, but they do not show up when the job is completed or updated. When I look in the database, those columns are null, however, they are pub

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

> On July 2, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Over VNC/RDP I've seen the login page take somewhere around 2minutes to > > load. This would definitely be useful. > > Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Here's the screen grab over RDP demonstrating the issue > http://www.youtube.co

Re: Review Request 12191: removed EnumerationImpl

> On July 1, 2013, 3:07 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! > > Hugo Trippaers wrote: > master: 16b7509a234158b536155be9278cfee33b93a5c7 > 4.2: 00e99a08169b60b0449d67dfc891053cf4469bf7 > > Hugo Trippaers wrote: > This was the wrong patch, this is the removed CleanupDelegate pat

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Ryan, Those fields were added to indicate the instances (volumes, vms, etc) having pending/active async jobs. The customers' main use case was - by instance id, find out the jobs that are currently being executed for this instance. Once the job is completed, the field is offset to NULL. -Alena.

RE: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Ryan, There's explicit code to remove those two columns. IIRC, the reason is because asyncjob actually uses those two fields to sequence jobs on the same id and type. So when the job is done, then it removes those two fields so it doesn't block the next job. --Alex > -Original Message--

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Ok. I see the "reset attached object" calls now. I'm curious why those columns are being wiped out. If you wanted to see outstanding calls for an ID or Type, wouldn't you just query where the jobStatus is still equal to zero? Wiping out those columns seems to destroy history, no? On Jul 2, 2

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Tom, this seems like an issue with entry stored in our DB. I will take a look at this bug and update you. Just to clarify, this symptom only happens when you register these templates to Amazon S3, not for Cloudian or RiakCS S3, right? Thanks -min On 7/1/13 7:27 PM, "Thomas O'Dowd" wrote: >Yes t

RE: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies

Donal, I could not find a response to this. The dependencies that are Apache or MIT licensed are fine. I think the .NET run time dep is fine as well. I expect it will be pre-installed, just like ESXi is today. We just have to document that in the install guide. I know there was some discus

Re: ACS plugins

Thanks Brian, the UI plugins work on the master branch. However, after registering a plugin the Wiki says "Reload the UI – rerun the build UI portion of the mvn build, if not in the active Tomcat/jetty folder, and then refresh the browser. You should see your new plugin in the side navigation bar!

Re: Review Request 11984: Fix primary datastore NPE/incorrect db entry/exception propagation for KVM on cloudstack

> On June 20, 2013, 10:37 p.m., edison su wrote: > > engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/DataStoreLifeCycle.java, > > line 44 > > > > > > If stoagemanager wants to delete datastore, then j

Re: ACS plugins

I wonder if this would work for you to reload (I've only used it when making changes to existing JavaScript files, though)? mvn -P developer -pl :cloud-client-ui -DskipTests=true On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:59 PM, CK wrote: > Thanks Brian, the UI plugins work on the master branch. > > However, af

Coding Convention Reminder

I like to remind everyone to review our coding conventions. Our coding conventions have been going all over the place recently. Please take a look. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions I also like to propose that we extend the 120 column limit to 180 column

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

Fields in job record are tend to be used to reflect job status in job's life cycle instead of history. Kelven On 7/2/13 1:35 PM, "Ryan Dietrich" wrote: >Ok. I see the "reset attached object" calls now. > >I'm curious why those columns are being wiped out. If you wanted to see >outstanding cal

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Hi Tom, I investigated this issue through the db dump you provided in the bug, this is an issue with our db view template_view creation script, and it has been fixed in resolving another bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3314). I have verified the fix using your db dump

Re: Async Job / Event Bus issue

He has a point though, why go to the trouble of removing the data to tell that a job is no longer active, when there's a field that tells us if the job is active? Was there some other reason? On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > Fields in job record are tend to be used to reflect

Re: Review Request 11984: Fix primary datastore NPE/incorrect db entry/exception propagation for KVM on cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11984/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 11:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers

RE: changing bug severity

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:27 PM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: changing bug severity > > I've noticed bugs change severity from Major->Critical->Blocker and > vice-versa without reason. Can the bug reporte

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

We'd better export the code template from Eclipse, then everybody can import the template into their IDE, then possible, everybody will have the same configuration. > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:11 PM > To: dev@clo

  1   2   >