Have you seeded the secondary storage with the default systemvm template?
Regards,
Devdeep
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 8:33 AM, B Prakash wrote:
> Thanks Jayapal, Abhinandan.
>
> log SMlog doesnt giveout much, I am able to mount and edit file on mount
> from both server and agent. I
GitHub user devdeep opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/715
CLOUDSTACK-8687: Prepare template only on a given storage pool
Update prepare template api to seed/prepare a template only on a given
primary storage. Currently, the prepare template api will
Github user devdeep closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-132439804
@remibergsma I'll close this pull request and generate a new one where the
unit tests are squashed in one commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-132072881
@DaanHoogland added some additional tests to validate the templates get
scheduled for seeding.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-131683283
Changes looks good to me. @remibergsma Are you ok with these changes? I'll
go ahead and merge them then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-131020409
Added another test to validate the prepareTemplate function. Looked into if
it was possible to mock the threadpool executor service in templatemanagerimpl.
However
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-129411154
@DaanHoogland That is what I am looking into; how to get the number of
threads that have been started by the executor service.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-128292255
@DaanHoogland When prepareTemplate is called, it either falls into
prepareTemplateInOneStoragePool if one primary has to be seeded with the
template; or
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#issuecomment-127850003
@DaanHoogland Added unit tests for prepare template functionality too. Can
you take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user devdeep commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635#discussion_r35849928
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/template/PrepareTemplateCmd.java
---
@@ -60,6 +61,15 @@
description
GitHub user devdeep opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/635
CLOUDSTACK-8687: Prepare template only on a given storage pool
Update prepare template api to seed/prepare a template only on a given
primary storage. Currently, the prepare template api will
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-122773398
I'll take a look and get back if I have any queries
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user devdeep commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/257#issuecomment-103402775
@terbolous FS for this can be found here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Disabling+Storage+Pool+for+Provisioning.
To answer your query on
GitHub user devdeep opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/257
Implementation for the ability to disable a storage pool for provisioning
of new volumes.
Implementation for the ability to disable a storage pool for provisioning
of new volumes. Following
Congrats Rohit.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 1:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack
>
> The Project Mana
storage
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Disabling+Storage+Pool+for+Provisioning
Regards,
Devdeep
Congrats Wilder.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:44 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wilder Rodrigues
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
If a storage pool is put in disabled state then it will not be picked up as a
possible destination when a volume is being migrated or when a virtual machine
is being migrated along with its volumes.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.
would require new apis for disabling/enabling storage pool.
Thoughts, comments?
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:48 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.a
If you dashboard is showing 0/0 that means the secondary storage has not been
successfully added. What error do you get while adding secondary storage? Is
there anything else in the logs besides the stack trace you have shared?
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: As
Congrats Rajani.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 3:52 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Rajani Karuturi
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 23, 2014, 9:30 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
7972f53c8d35b78bd27cbd2c8bb1beb763b69c00
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 19, 2014, 5:51 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
ou'll either need
to include the apache license or skip license check on it.
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https:
Yes, I have made a similar fix and committed the changes.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:05 AM
> To: Devdeep Singh
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re
direct connected agents, which
includes xenserver, hyper-v etc.
I'll be submitting a fix for this issue. Do let me know if you have any
concerns with it.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7598
Regards,
Devdeep
was that with custom
offerings the profile wasn't getting initialized correctly and it lacked the
cpu and memory details. This would cause a null pointer exception in the
allocators. I can apply the patch if no one else is working on it.
- Devdeep
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25430/#review52852
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 8, 2014, 1:55 p.m
issue with
failed unit tests too.
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 8, 2014, 8:22 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
master
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 8, 2014, 8:57 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
master
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:07 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
97f5281cf46e686d23df0fe0b1db0a6b6d591944
- Devdeep Singh
On July 24, 2014, 5:39 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
0ecc9f79af0f915ac347f856c3c2f8ce40f636af
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 4, 2014, 6:08 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
> On Aug. 18, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > Ship It!
Committed in master in commit 1c688f40e134e2f65fe11bb37946e550feb896ca
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vis
asf master
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 4, 2014, 10:10 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2/#review50859
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 7, 2014, 6:13 a.m
Applied the patch to 4.4 branch and pushed. Thanks Anshul.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 2:13 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/#review49336
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 1, 2014, 5:21 a.m
Taking a look at it. Maybe a cherry-pick from 4.4-forward to 4.4 was missed.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 9:18 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 br
Congrats Santhosh.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:55 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Santhosh Edukulla as a committer...
>
> Hi All,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Clou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22808/#review46390
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 23, 2014, 6:01 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22807/#review46389
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 23, 2014, 5:30 a.m
/AbstractStoragePoolAllocator.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22807/#comment81579>
For a zone wide storage pool, the clusterId would be null. In that case you
should check with the storage pool hypervisor type. A zone wide storage pool
has a hypervisor field associated with it.
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22256/#review46267
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 20, 2014, 10:21 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22500/#review45600
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 13, 2014, 9:08 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45595
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 10, 2014, 11:23 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22452/#review45597
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 11, 2014, 7:31 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22415/#review45596
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 11, 2014, 5:20 a.m
Congrats Amogh.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 11:44 PM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Amogh Vasekar to become a commit
Hi Daan,
Could you please cherry-pick commit f5ce280da32c4e0837fa39651dc801ba3f906e41
from 4.4-forward branch to 4.4 branch.
commit f5ce280da32c4e0837fa39651dc801ba3f906e41
Author: Devdeep Singh
Date: Tue May 20 11:40:51 2014 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-6810: Fix storage migration of a vm with
Congrats Saksham.
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Saksha
/allocator/LocalStoragePoolAllocator.java,
Line 76
if (dskCh.getType() == Volume.Type.DATADISK && plan.getHostId() != null) {
Anyone aware why the check for data disk type was added in the first place?
Will it break any scenario if I remove this check?
Regards,
Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21429/#review43951
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On May 14, 2014, 8:02 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21259/#review42567
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On May 9, 2014, 9:07 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21260/#review42568
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On May 9, 2014, 9:26 a.m
Hi Daan,
Please cherry pick the following commits to 4.4 branch.
commit 681e628543f40fcf1f3cb89592c2dc8e89b5eeb1
Author: Devdeep Singh
Date: Mon May 5 16:59:39 2014 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-6510: Fix gson serialization exception in storage migration.
Gson couldn't serialize
a map
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20701/#review41456
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 25, 2014, 6:14 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20651/#review41455
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 25, 2014, 8:28 a.m
Hi Tejas,
It should work but I would recommend that you seed the vmware systemvm template
too on the secondary storage.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:05 PM
> To: us...@cloudstac
for hyper-v you'll have to
create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v
zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage of type SMB.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20365/#review40873
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 15, 2014, 8:44 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19868/#review40871
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 15, 2014, 4:45 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20315/#review40372
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 15, 2014, 5:12 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20313/#review40371
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 14, 2014, 8:41 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20311/#review40370
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 14, 2014, 8:28 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19906/#review39773
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On April 2, 2014, 8:35 a.m
Hi Tejas,
Thanks. I'll into both the issues.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Password visible in plan text CS 4.3
>
&g
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19713/#review39139
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On March 27, 2014, 6:13 a.m
Hi Tejas,
Can you file a bug for these? We clean up a string before logging it; but it
looks like we missed it here.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 6:01 PM
> To: dev@cloudstac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19521/#review38719
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On March 21, 2014, 6:47 a.m
.
1. Windows Server 2012 R2 wasn't needed as it was already added in 421to430
script.
2. Split CentoOS 6.5 into 32 and 64 bit types.
- Devdeep Singh
On March 20, 2014, 11:50 a.m., Alex Hitchins wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an
I'll merge these changes later today.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:32 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [Merge] Storage motion for hyper-v
>
> Hi,
%2E4
[2]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hyperv-storagemotion
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6143
[4] test/integration/component/test_storage_motion.py
Regards,
Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17889/#review36759
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 27, 2014, 12:35 p.m
I was looking into adding support for iSCSI (CLOUDSTACK-6109) and HA of guest
vms (CLOUDSTACK-6144) for hyper-v. I don't think I'll be able to finish it by
14th.
Regards,
Devdeep
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014
ails index should begin with 0.
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 27, 2014, 12:35 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>
before this issue was fixed
and that is why management server fails to decrypt it.
Regards,
Devdeep
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Rajesh Battala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: hyper-v broken again?
Mgmt. server code from rc6
Hi Paul,
Can you check if the hyperv agent is latest? The agent seems to be out of sync
on the host.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:43 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Devdeep Singh
>
r smb). However,
it would mean adding a password with special characters could fail if the
password wasn't encoded and then the entire url encoded again. So I updated it
to pass smb user information in details. This is required only if a storage
pool being added is of type smb.
Regard
If you are using a development environment you may see multiple mount points
getting created. I'll look into addressing this. You shouldn't see this if you
have installed cloudstack from rpm. The management server will clean up the
mount points.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Origin
eef65ac776de171d83f9f532ac2dda6902117178 and
b86d45b0036482cfc9c9fc55f62954a1b9599188 respectively.
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:07 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
ould you make separate entries for Windows 8.1 (32 bit). and Windows 8.1
(64 bit). Similarly for Windows Server 2012 R2. Similar pattern has been
followed for all windows sku.
- Devdeep Singh
On Jan. 30, 2014, 11:18 a.m., Al
/WmiCallsV2.cs
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/17842/#comment64016>
This will also return the root partition (computer system). Hyper-V agent
should filter out the root partition entry and then return the updated vmsync
state.
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 7, 2014, 11:22 a.m., Anshul Gangwar
g/r/17842/#comment64015>
Hyperv agent should map the hyper-v state to cloudstack state and return an
appropriate state in the answer. Lookat
WmiCallsV2::EnabledState.ToCloudStackState
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 7, 2014, 11:22 a.m., Anshul G
Hi Paul,
Looks like you are using untagged vlan in your setup. There was a bug in agent
code with respect to that. Rajesh made a fix for it in commit-id
7df148c762510f669b60edff9d8d690c800b1f95 few days back. This fix should address
the problem.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message
ystem vm (ssvm or consolve proxy or router vm) is started, it'll get copied
over.
Regards,
Devdeep
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 4:35 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: systemvm-4.3.0.iso
Have any changes been made to the deploym
> On Feb. 6, 2014, 8:15 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Devdeep Singh wrote:
> Committed to 4.3-forward branch in commit id
> fb87c85b2a313d75af7cd4b790118fea30a2dd1b
Committed to master in commit id 13e0f293edc718a9ee03c56896b65240
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17583/#review33773
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Jan. 31, 2014, 7:51 a.m
> On Feb. 6, 2014, 8:15 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > Ship It!
Committed to 4.3-forward branch in commit id
fb87c85b2a313d75af7cd4b790118fea30a2dd1b
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vis
Hi Francois,
This looks like an issue in cloudstack. Can you file a bug with the details?
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 6:48 PM
To: Srikanteswararao Talluri
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi Animesh,
Can I cherry-pick commit 6d997bd6893f0ab649899f88456d6e80b23bb873 from
4.3-forward to 4.3 branch? This commit addresses issue CLOUDSTACK-5942 where
the hyper-v agent was logging the password at few places.
Regards,
Devdeep
file from this directory.
2. On secondary storage there will be a systemvm directory with the iso file.
Delete the directory itself.
When cloudstack tries to create VR, it'll copy the iso file again.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shape
Glad to know it worked for you. Do let me know if you face any issue.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Donal Lafferty; Devdeep Singh; Rajesh Battala; Anshul
talk to the agent. Following
link [1] will tell you how to go about it.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Manually+Creating+and+installing+self+signed+certificate+for+CloudStack+Management+Server+communication+with+Hyper-V+agent
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Me
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16540/#review32134
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Jan. 16, 2014, 1:52 p.m
Hi Paul,
>From the logs it looks like you have setup the zone in Basic mode. Basic mode
>is right now not supported for Hyper-V. Can you set it up in Advanced mode and
>see if it works?
Regards,
Devdeep
P.S. I just tried setting up the zone in Basic mode and confirmed I got
STACK-5869
Regards,
Devdeep
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Donal Lafferty; Rajesh Battala; Anshul Gangwar
Subject: Hyper-V
Guys,
Primary storage local or shared is still giving me grief.
See the error
. Kindly close the review
request.
- Devdeep Singh
On Jan. 3, 2014, 11:42 a.m., Anshul Gangwar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
