+1
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:58 AM Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Apr 5, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Sunday, April 5, 2015, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are
> > proposing the do
Mike,
XenServer 6.2 + SP1 + XS62ESP1004 hotfix and the versions after support a
new API that allows CloudStack to copy the deltas between two snapshots.
With that addition, CloudStack no longer needed the plugin scripts because
that's what the plugin scripts were mainly for. Don't try to backport
; >> Doh! I mixed up master (4.5) with 4.4 in my e-mail. My mistake. I
> >> understand your question now, Daan.
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Daan Hoogland
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey, I missed this mail. Should I have picked
I checked into master the changes that remove our copy and just use the copy
the XenServer team checked into maven. Is there any reason we're talking about
this?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:40 AM
> To: dev@clo
Hi All,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Santhosh
Edukulla to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit c
major points that should be patched when adding a new
> hypervisor type?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ivan
>
> 18.06.2014, 18:24, "Alex Huang" :
> > IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX
> API. At the time (before Apache), the fea
IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API.
At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter.
There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Efremov [mail
In general, as long as it works in the new jvm, I don't see us changing the
code. However, if you have the time to do it. The upgrade classes are meant
to be immutable as far as data goes. So the idea is we can do upgrades from
any version to the current version. Because of that, then all up
2, 2014 10:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Sebastien Goasguen; Alex Huang; Frank Zhang
> Subject: Re: Why does cloudstack-setup-management make /root writable?
>
> Thanks Sebastien, and Chiradeep,
>
> I've already push a commit to remove the code.
> If som
> Like Chip, I am very concerned with this being dependent on a single
> company, even if its the company that employs me. It isn't sustainable, it
> excludes others from contributing, and makes the project less independent
> because it depends on a single company's infrastructure.
Agreed there.
Sorry for the late replies on this folks. I've been away for my $dayjob at
Citrix. Let me try to see if I can make clear what I see as
objections/questions/understandings and address them one by one. If I got them
wrong, let me know and please clarify what you're asking.
@Sebastien
> Why don
in their own billing database. The fact that #2
doesn’t generate an event would mean this process would be broken for them.
This is the regression that causes the blocker.
--Alex
From: Alex Ough [mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 11:02 AM
To: Alex Huang
Cc: Murali
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:21:34PM +0000, Alex Huang wrote:
> > I think infrastructure code should just be checked in with the source
> > code. To separate it means you have to deal with version
> > match/mismatch between infrastructure and source code.
>
> Sorry
reviewer put it through CI for you.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Ritu Sabharwal [mailto:rsabh...@brocade.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 11:23 AM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: FW: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain o
> that we can create one and check them in to be made available to all.
>
> Regards,
> Santhosh
>
> From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:43 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject:
Hi,
It seems several of my emails to this topics bounced. I added a Q&A section to
the original wiki to answer the questions raised in this thread so everyone who
reads the process later on can have better understanding. Specifically, the
following questions:
Q: I'm a contributor and not a c
epository. In that
> case, does it mean that I install Jenkins locally on my setup.
> >
> > Please help.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ritu S.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2
elopment process of CloudStack.
> >>
> >> I have a question about the Jenkins, when you say create a branch for
> your code and ask Jenkins to run BVT on your branch. The branch will be
> created on my local repository but Jenkins would run on central repository. In
I've find some of my emails did not make it to the mailing list. Does anyone
else have this problem?
--Alex
od. You could add link in the list of 'developer
> resposibilities' to relevant documentation.
>
> kind regards,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is something I brought up a long time ago b
you can wait for me to
come back the week after.
--Alex
From: Alex Ough [mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 9:28 AM
To: Alex Huang
Cc: Murali Reddy; Alena Prokharchyk; Kishan Kavala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Control event publishing in multi region setups
[mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com]
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 9:14 PM
To: Alex Huang
Cc: Murali Reddy; Alena Prokharchyk; Kishan Kavala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Control event publishing in multi region setups
Are we going to rolling this out?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Alex Ough
Hi All,
This is something I brought up a long time ago but really didn't have the
resources to get it all up and running until now. Throughout the past year,
Edison, Prasanna, Amogh, Bharat, Koushik, Talluri, and others have been
chipping away at it. At this point, we finally pull together a
Daan,
I added Anthony to the to list to draw his attention. I propose that you just
revert commits if the right process is not followed for a release branch.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 1:50 AM
> T
xen-api.jar as a
dependency for every single package in CloudStack. It should only be for the
xenserver related packages. Can you resubmit with that tested? I think you
just need to remove it from the cloudstack main pom.xml but best to test it.
Thanks.
--Alex
- Alex Huang
On April 9
nto maintenance again after fixing the problems.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 4:41 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Remove Mgmt Server
>
> +1
>
> It should be sim
+1
It should be similar to how our resources have states: enable/disable/inactive.
Enable means the mgmt server node is enabled. Inactive means it shouldn't be
serving new requests (in this case handle new jobs). Disable means the mgmt.
server is ready to be taken down because all jobs it is
e problem.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 12:01 AM
> To: Murali Reddy; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [4.4] Current State
>
> Let's roll this back for now until the right fix is f
Let's roll this back for now until the right fix is found.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Murali Reddy
> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 11:42 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: [4.4] Current State
>
> Is there a workaround
This is a severe bug if that's the case. It's supposed to stop the heartbeat
script when a primary storage is placed in maintenance.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 1:06 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject:
I've talked about this all the way back when we were in Amsterdam and now it's
finally done. Tina (Konstantina Chremmou) checked in a patch that removes
CloudStack's own copy of XenServerJava source code and submitted a copy of the
xen-api.jar into the maven repository. Since xen-api.jar is b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/#review39353
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Huang
On April 2, 2014, 2:59 p.m
aster. It looks to
be fine for 4.4 but currently 4.4 is not building so I will get it applied once
4.4. is compiling.
- Alex Huang
On April 2, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Konstantina Chremmou wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically genera
[DESIGN] No agent calls within database transactions
>
> Yeah, that assert issue has bitten us once or twice, and I know Ryan
> squawked about it at some point. Do we have any point where enforcement
> will occur (BVT or some other tests)?
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Alex
Hi All,
I was alerted to this problem recently and it's something that affects
developers so I want to bring it up. It is a design principle in CloudStack
that we do not make agent calls within database transactions. The reason is
because when you make a call to an external system, there's no
I prefer having exit codes. Is always nicer to use that than to grep for error
messages.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:56 AM
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CloudMonkey -
From: Miguel Ferreira [mailto:mferre...@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:58 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling databse upgrades on master branch
>
> Hi Rajani,
>
> Indeed I see the overlap with th
of the CS MS and which ones don't? Also, I wonder if the GUI just
> says this for all Global Settings that are changed because it has no knowledge
> of which ones really require a reboot. Does that sound correct?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:18
I added something to address this last year.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Configuration
It addresses several problems.
- Parameter values are not stored in member variables so it's possible for
changed values to take effect without reboot.
- Breaks up the enum so tha
oogland
> wrote:
> > I am actually -1 on any history falsification or destruction. I have
> > no interest in this particular history but if citrix doesn't mind us
> > seeing it we should leave it as is.
> >
> > regads,
> > Daan
> >
> > On Mon,
Sebastien,
It's a -0 for me. If it's important to do, sure.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:54 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Removing TAGS
>
>
>
What does it achieve? Tags don't cost anything. The code came from Citrix.
Removing the TAGS is not going to take that away.
I like having git metadata in case I need to go find something really old or
understand where the code made its fork. It doesn't happen often but I do like
having t
Yes.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:31 AM
> To: Sonal Ojha; David Nalley
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
>
> I have to refer to the project owner
:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:03 AM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: vhd-util on 64 bit system
>
> great, I am assuming this will include the convert sub-command as well??
> Hugo's link works I now have to functioning vhd-util o
> >
> > I would prefer the entire file is not in CloudStack as it really has
> > nothing to
> do with CloudStack itself. But, I'm fine with Hugo suggestion of this being
> put
> into pluginin enabled by noredist and mysql is only dependent upon in that
> plugin's pom.xml.
>
> My reasoning here
2014 +0100
> >
> >Move mysql ha strategy to a plugin. Activate this plugin using the
> > mysqlha profile or the noredist flag
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27 feb. 2014, at 09:25, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 27 feb. 2014, at 09:09, Alex
ur copy of xapi lib
- Remove our copy of NFSSR.py
All functionalities are supported in the hotfix. The hotfix is to be applied
on top of 6.2 + SP1.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:54 AM
&g
. There's clearly compile dependency on mysql
> >>in StaticStrategy.
> >>
> >>To me, when I look at StaticStartegy, it makes sense to move that into
> >>separate project in github and reference people to it if they want to
> >>use the specific
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:36 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: developers and mysql
>
> Hey,
>
> StaticStrategy is an optional component, so it should be perfectly OK to
> include it at comp
DB HA wiki. That to me would make it a runtime
dependency only.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Damoder Reddy
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:20 PM
> To: Alex Huang; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: developers and mysql
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>
on work from Damoder.
> > I didn't speak up at the time, but I am really reluctant for
> > mysql-specific features to sneak in and lock us in.
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
> >> Who added the dependency on mysql for framework-
forms - Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat
> >
> > On Feb 25, 2014, at 3:49 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
> >
> >> csuich2 is added
> >>
> >> @Alex: go to browse -> space admin -> permissions
> >>
> >> On Tue,
uring the management server startup like injecting ssh keys into
> systemvm.iso etc.. Still I am in search of any other scripts will get called
> in
> management server, though I could not find any as of now.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Damodar/
>
> -Original Message---
; permissions
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> > I was going to help Chris with this but turns out with the new wiki, I don't
> know how to make myself an administrator any more (or my privilege has
> been revoked?). Anyone know how to do it?
>
Who added the dependency on mysql for framework-db? We actually worked hard to
keep that depending on jdbc only. It should not depend on mysql. We need to
fix that.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Tuesday, Feb
I was going to help Chris with this but turns out with the new wiki, I don't
know how to make myself an administrator any more (or my privilege has been
revoked?). Anyone know how to do it?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
> Sent:
gt; Python.
>
> -abhi
>
>
> On 25/02/14 12:06 am, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>
> >One additional requirement I have would be don't use any windows
> >components that don't come with the default systems targeted. I know
> >it sounds great to u
Hugo,
I understand removing mysql jar during compile time by switching the scope to
'provided', but I don't understand why it's necessary to remove it from jetty
run and deploy db. In a normal build, these two targets are not run. They're
just convenience targets.
--Alex
> -Original Mes
I think we should just revert the commits on problems. It actually helps the
developers because it gives them a chance to redo it in the correct way and
hopefully, they gain more understanding of what needs to be done. At worst,
they will remember if penalized enough times. Sometimes, tough l
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> > >> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:49
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> > >>
>
Sateesh,
I think if you want to do this then it points to a larger change to templates.
Today, the templates carry no meta information. This means templates should
carry meta information regarding the os image and how to support it. This
should not specifically target vmware. It can benefit
> A couple of more to add to the list.
> There isn't really a good binary software dependency resolution framework
> for Windows (at least not that I am aware of) and you potentially need lots of
> different things - mysql libraries, python, ipmitool, or another shell to
> execute shell scripts. Lo
I see this as that CS management server should run anywhere java runs.
However, I see quite a few holes in this proposal.
- Management server should never have mounted the NFS secondary storage. We
need to fix that. Please have a talk with Kelven about this. I don't see us
adding Samba to a
+1 It's confusing to have id and ids all over the place. We should just say
all ids can come in arrays by default.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 9:56 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]
What's really needed is a reserve API. It would be a big undertaking though as
that concept is not in any of the network and storage plugins.
--alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 6:10 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sounds good. Thanks Wido!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Switch to Java 7 in master branch on Monday Jan 27th
> 2014
>
> Hi,
>
> We had mult
Why is jre7 required for vmware? Kelven, you have any idea?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:08 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: systemvm templates
>
> Hugo,
>
> First of
editor like eclipse. I'm not
> seeing those issues in my eclipse at the moment, so i'll try to reproduce them
> and see if they can be fixed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
> On 15 jan. 2014, at 05:02, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> > Yes. I do believe it r
ay I have checkstyle configured in Eclipse causes it to
> take a
> super long time to build. Not sure what setting I turned on to do that, but
> even removing the plug-in for the time being is extremely slow because
> Eclipse always wants to run checkstyle.
>
>
> On Tue, Ja
Hi Hugo,
I see that you added the checkstyle project back in. I actually tried that
first when I made checkstyle required for the entire project. It is the
recommended procedure from the checkstyle website. Unfortunately, it causes
problems like the following exceptions in eclipse all of the
Mike I don't see this many warnings in my eclipse in master. The only one I
see currently is the one regarding opendaylight pom.xml have a target not in
the m2e lifecycle.
Can you drill down more and tell us what it thinks the problem is? The png
just shows a list of poms with problems but no
subject, do you know of a good way to easily
> >>> apply the checkstyle rules to all projects without having to go into
> >>> the project properties of each project?
> >>>
> >>> Sometimes I find it useful in Eclipse after a big update from Git
> >
Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I can install the plug-in for Eclipse.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Alex!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu
Mike,
If you're using eclipse, checkstyle has a plugin that you can install. Point
the plugin to the style file in tools/checkstyle/cloud-style.xml and it will
use the same syntax. I've always found it much easier to use the plugin than
to read the build outputs.
If you don't want to install
3 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang; Darren Shepherd
> Subject: RE: Upgrade to newer version of gson?
>
> Oh, a minor upgrade should be enough:
> https://code.google.com/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=354
> Just need to bump up to 1.7.2.
>
> > -Or
I was in Cambridge before the ccceu13 and worked with the XS team on this.
They're working on a patch release to 6.2 that will include everything we need
in vhd-util, which will remove this dependency. It's expected end of Jan/start
of feb. Unfortunately, it's too big an effort for them to ba
Done.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 11:51 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org (dev@cloudstack.apache.org)
> Subject: Contrail as new component in Jira
>
> Need new component Contrail in Jira to track
Nitin,
I reverted 6b62a04eaf1196ebcce5e81c29c9e0f59dd4f858 because unit test won't
compile. Please run your tests before you checkin.
--Alex
-Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:16 PM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cloudstack no longer monitoring log4j-cloud.xml?
>
> Cc'ing dev lis
I don't know of anything in Cloudstack that requires 6.0.32.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:32 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Tomcat Version
>
> Is 6.0.32 the only version that wil
Hey Darren,
I've just been alerted that cloudstack doesn't seem to be dynamically loading
the log4j configurations any more. This means you need to restart the server
every time someone changes the logging level. This was done by the
componentlocator previously. Was this lost during the spri
Kishan,
I reverted 3a3fec3cb6bb4f9a008370ea02279d286654b01a because it fails unit test.
Please make sure unit tests pass before committing your changes.
--Alex
It makes sense to. I think we started with vmdk and is now using ova. If so,
whoever did the change just didn't rename the file. Would have been better to
just add a new processor when that change was done...
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmai
Marcus,
When I refactored the template upload process ages ago, I left in an interface
called Processor.java. The whole purpose of which was to allow others to add
post processing of the template once its been uploaded. Such conversions can
be done there. Take a look and see if it suits your
Thank Hugo!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 5:43 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [JENKINS] Build errors
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Several builds have intermittent build errors at t
Ok...I think I fixed it.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 4:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Build failure caused by checkstyle...
>
> After you do this one time, yo
After you do this one time, you don't have to do it again. That's why it works
on mine because it got stored in the local cache. I'm still trying to figure
out what to do about this.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Thursday, December 12
bject: Re: Build failure caused by checkstyle...
>
> I got this build failure on a fresh clone as well. On a previously built
> project, it
> worked however.
>
> On 12/12/13 2:16 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure how to fix this for Jenkins. The pro
.@cloudstack.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; n...@cloudstack.org;
> dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com; aprat...@apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk;
> Alex Huang; tall...@apache.org; Devdeep Singh; Kishan Kavala; Nitin Mehta
> Subject: Build
I just finished what I set out to do during the ccceu hackathon. I was able to
turn on checkstyle with the following limitations:
- line length is very long. More than the 180 characters we agreed on.
There's just too many lines for me to fix.
- It's disabled for the XenServerJava(xapi) proje
g SQLStatement to avoid resource
> leaks
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:45:03PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
> > Why not just use java 7? What's stopping us?
> >
> > --Alex
>
> This is a relevant thread with stated objections:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/a4lfcbqwi7y474hy
Why not just use java 7? What's stopping us?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 1:28 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]Closing SQLStatement to avoid resource
> l
do HA or
> DRS."
>
> This means that with Vmware (where there is native HA), affinity groups
> doesn't work.
>
> -Koushik
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-
> +Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups
>
> On 28-Nov-2013, at 3:
Koushik,
How do you propose for XS HA to work with CloudStack's host affinity use cases?
I don't see anything in the spec regarding this. I generally don't think VM
HA can be done with hypervisor HA because of this.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.
Has anyone actually tried dropping in a different jdbc driver and see if CS can
use another DB? I don't think the current CS DB layer prevents anyone from
doing that.
This is different from MariaDB which, as othes have pointed out, is drop-in
replacement for MySQL. I'm talking about stuff lik
It's because we switched over to a new way to declare configuration variables.
Here's some information about it.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Configuration
--Alex
From: Alex Ough [mailto:alex.o...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:56 AM
To:
I should have fixed this already.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: jenk...@cloudstack.org [mailto:jenk...@cloudstack.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 8:17 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; n...@cloudstack.org; Alex Huang
> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: b
Feature freeze for 4.3 is closed. This should go into the new db upgrade.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 12:03 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Error while running master
>
>
>
> On 11
riginal Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:39 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Reformat of the source code
>
> +1!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> >
Here's a wiki page about it.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DB+Upgrade+in+CloudStack
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Syed Ahmed [mailto:sah...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Wei ZHOU
> Subject
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
