---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21429/#review43950
---
Commit 26fa623ffd427fa996968ce4e16c0262f7dd016e in cloudstack's bran
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21429/#review43951
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On May 14, 2014, 8:02 a.m., An
Hi Daan/Hugo,
Can you please cherry-pick following from 4.4-forward to 4.4:
commit b85f687cd7f12cd14a1feeb80593ba55e05b2fa8
Author: Anshul Gangwar
Date: Wed May 14 13:18:41 2014 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-6663: Fixed Hyper-V agent fails to start on some setups. During
startup agent tries
to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21429/#review43949
---
Commit b85f687cd7f12cd14a1feeb80593ba55e05b2fa8 in cloudstack's bran
Hi Daan,
Please cherry-pick the following commits to 4.4.
commit 37a3a65c7c7f083a5536c078a1c8436ef9e14597
Author: Jayapal
Date: Mon May 26 15:10:35 2014 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-6761: Fixed removing proxy arp rule on deleting static nat or PF
rule on ip
commit 587ee544f2d8223599e5ee8c56f926ebf78
Hi Daan,
Can you cherry-pick commit 2ab7bcade2f37cb17e071a6154fdae1d80e4ff99 from
4.4-forward to 4.4?
This fixes bug CLOUDSTACK-6756
~Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21853/#review43948
---
Ship it!
commit ce6a53e37b982d868ae923a294cf49df5cfed27e
Author: R
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21853/#review43947
---
Commit ce6a53e37b982d868ae923a294cf49df5cfed27e in cloudstack's bran
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21853/
---
(Updated May 27, 2014, 4:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21853/#review43946
---
Patch does not apply to master branch. Can you please submit a anoth
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21853/#review43945
---
Ship it!
commit 2ab7bcade2f37cb17e071a6154fdae1d80e4ff99
Author: Ra
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21853/#review43944
---
Commit 2ab7bcade2f37cb17e071a6154fdae1d80e4ff99 in cloudstack's bran
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21912/#review43942
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On May 26, 2014, 1:55 p.m.
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/3
Added instructions for how to contribute
I removed the README.md file because it did not have anything useful in it
and we might as well keep the documentation files in RST. I created a
READM
Folks
One thing as former RM I have struggled with is visibility of whether an issue
is being worked upon rather than being just assigned. JIRA has a simple nice
thing called "In Progress" please make use of it. When you start working on an
issue I suggest please change the state to "In Progr
Hi Guys,
Just a small update on what I've been working on this week.
*[ec2stack]*
This week I started work on support for tags on ec2stack, this is
progressing nicely on the 'tag support' [1] branch on github.
The DescribeTags action is complete, I'm still working on the Create &
DeleteTags act
Hugo
Can you share the latest results? How can I get access to the reports?
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 7:58 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for c
Hi folks, I am sending this to the dev list as well, hence I am not sure if
it is or not a bug. Sorry if I am mistaken.
So, after I upgraded CS from 4.1.1 to 4.3.0, everything seemed to be
working just fine, however, whenever I try to download a template or volume
I am getting the following error:
>
> I'll also state for the record, that I will -1 any decision that leads us to
> depend on a single company's infrastructure as a project level policy. That
> said, having it available from Citrix for use is a great thing for that
> company
> to donate! It's going to be difficult to balance o
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code
> quality...
>
>
> On May 21, 2014, at 12:40 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
Daan
I concur with Sudha we should not change the priority of individual defects
without technical reasons. The outgoing defect rate is much lower for this time
of the release and certainly is a concern as you have raised. We should publish
daily list of blockers and ask for status update.
Yo
I did not do one for cloudstack-docs yet because it did not have an
existing README file and I am relatively new to this documentation system
and I didn't want to break something by adding a new file.
I don't mind adding a README.rst file assuming it won't cause any problems.
:)
Cheers,
Will
On May 26, 2014, at 6:08 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Thank you all for the feedback, that was very helpful.
>
> I have adjusted my steps quite a bit. Here is an overview...
> - I have removed the 'squashed' concept. I think it makes sense that the
> 'default' way that people contribute is with
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/13
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/12
improved the 'contribute' instructions in the README.rst
this update makes it easier for people to understand the flow for updating
the documentation.
You can merge this pull request
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/12
improved the 'contribute' instructions
I added the contribution workflow to the README.rst file so it is easier
for people to know how to contribute to the documentation.
You can merge thi
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/13
added better instructions to the 'contribute' section of the README
these instructions describe how to modify the documentation and create a
pull request for the changes to be committed
-1 on the proposal to lower priority of defects based on timeframe. These are
blockers for features and some for release as well. We should not be
modifying the priority of defect unless the original reporter or RM agrees to
do so for technical reasons but not because these are not touched by
Thank you all for the feedback, that was very helpful.
I have adjusted my steps quite a bit. Here is an overview...
- I have removed the 'squashed' concept. I think it makes sense that the
'default' way that people contribute is with a full history of their
changes and commit messages. I hope t
Hi Sudha,
Now Japan team are planning and developing open cloud certification program
that supported LPI team.
(LPI are already developed basically Linux administrator certification
program)
ref: http://www.lpi.org
GO
Go Chiba
E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Sudha
H,
recently unittests from RESTServiceConnectorTest have been failing
both in 4.4 and master. Those where created in february and have been
working till recently so I think some depandency has been changed.
Any one outthere knows of this?
thanks
--
Daan
Hi Mayumi,
Thanks to share our activity to Apache guys.
However, certification program are not released yet and it should be
under the stealth by my understanding because some of Japanese are
following user ML. So, can you please share it only marketing or dev
ML?
We'd like to announce it when w
Hey Mayumi,
Thanks for sharing this with all of us. We appreciate the effort.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 26 mei 2014, at 16:40, Mayumi K wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I apologize for my delay in updating Activities of Japanese CloudStack
> Community.
>
>
> # # #
>
> ## Develop OSS Cloud Certification
>
Hi everyone
I apologize for my delay in updating Activities of Japanese CloudStack
Community.
# # #
## Develop OSS Cloud Certification
LPI Japan is very positive to build new certification, OSS Cloud based
on Apache CloudStack.
Some members of JCSUG started examination development.
## CloudSta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21773/
---
(Updated May 26, 2014, 2:34 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21776/
---
(Updated May 26, 2014, 2:32 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21912/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6764
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21908/#review43928
---
Anders, use the BroadcastDomainType from Networks.java for this.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21904/#review43924
---
4.4-forward:
author Gaurav Aradhye
Mon, 26 May 2014
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21904/#review43923
---
4.4-forward:
author Gaurav Aradhye
Mon, 26 May 2014
LS,
When I seeing once again our release schedule shift, I think we have
no option but to move feature freeze for the next release forward.
This is the only way it seems we can reduce the complexity of the
total sum of changes. Therefore it is the only way we can prevent
lapsing even more in time
Hi Saurav,
Can you please file bug describing the issue ?
Also please update the bug-id in review request.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 24-May-2014, at 12:24 AM, Santhosh Edukulla
wrote:
>
>
>> On April 29, 2014, 12:29 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
>>> Ship It!
>
> If we don't have any review issue
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21908/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Not well formatted but is this what you want?
Key Summary Reporter Assignee Updated
CLOUDSTACK-6754
SSVM not responding with S3 secondary sotre
Pavan Kumar Bandarupally Min Chen 26/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6755
[OVS] Can't create more than 7 GRE tunnel networks in xen cluster
Sanjeev N Murali
On May 26, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I
> can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I
> would really get some consent on this.
Can you send the list of those blockers to the list with th
I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I
can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I
would really get some consent on this.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I will start implementing this on Monday.
>
> Also I would l
Chiradeep,
I read the vpc-peering option again and it seems not to give us
enough. We want a superset of this feature where more then two vpc can
be connected to the same intervpc network. Use cases are
- have a single monitor and other management devices for several
applications in different vpcs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21905/
---
(Updated May 26, 2014, 3:04 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Ed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21905/#review43920
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Girish Shilamkar
On May 26, 2014, 9:13 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21905/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21904/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6726
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21764/#review43918
---
Master:
author Gaurav Aradhye
Wed, 21 May 2014 10:56
54 matches
Mail list logo
