Not well formatted but is this what you want?

Key Summary Reporter Assignee Updated
CLOUDSTACK-6754

SSVM not responding with S3 secondary sotre

Pavan Kumar Bandarupally Min Chen 26/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6755

[OVS] Can't create more than 7 GRE tunnel networks in xen cluster

Sanjeev N Murali Reddy 23/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6623

Register template does not work as expected, when deploying simulator
and xen zones simultaneously on a single management server.

Bharat Kumar edison su 22/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6603

[Upgrade]DB Exception while Autoscale monitoring after upgrading from 4.3 to 4.4

manasaveloori Rajesh Battala 22/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6662

New XenServer host is not activated due to no agent connection

Daan Hoogland Anthony Xu 22/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6730

[Automation] test_egress_fw_rules test case failing while applying FW rule

Rayees Namathponnan Rayees Namathponnan 22/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6710

[Automation] VM snapshot failing with NPE in vmware

Rayees Namathponnan Likitha Shetty 21/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6602

[UI] createNetworkACL API action param value passed incorrectly

Jayapal Reddy Jessica Wang 20/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6675

NPE while executing updatePortForwardingRule

Chandan Purushothama Alena Prokharchyk 20/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6673

cloudstack-setup-management make a chmod 777 on /root

Milamber Unassigned 19/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6644

Unable to attach Volume to a VM as a System User

Chandan Purushothama edison su 19/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6599

Template/Volume URLs expiration functionality not working

Nitin Mehta Nitin Mehta 19/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6674

[Automation] [DB lock] When KVM agent is alert state, agent never
trying to connect back

Rayees Namathponnan edison su 14/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6572

[Hyper-V] Deploy VM inside VPC tier fails due to VR unable to find nic

Sowmya Krishnan Rajesh Battala 12/May/14





On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:05 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I
>> can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I
>> would really get some consent on this.
>
> Can you send the list of those blockers to the list with the name of the 
> reporter ?
>
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
>> <dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>>> I will start implementing this on Monday.
>>>
>>> Also I would like to propose that nothing is a blocker unless it has been 
>>> agreed on, on list.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08
>>> To: dev
>>> Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs
>>>
>>> LS,
>>>
>>> There are several blocker bugs registered for 4.4 that have not been 
>>> touched for over a week. I seems strange to me that a blocker would be left 
>>> alone for so long and I therefor propose to reduce priority of blockers 
>>> that have not been touched for over a week to trivial. I have mailed 
>>> reporters to a few querying about the status but this tactic doesn't work.
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to