I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I would really get some consent on this.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland <dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > I will start implementing this on Monday. > > Also I would like to propose that nothing is a blocker unless it has been > agreed on, on list. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08 > To: dev > Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs > > LS, > > There are several blocker bugs registered for 4.4 that have not been touched > for over a week. I seems strange to me that a blocker would be left alone for > so long and I therefor propose to reduce priority of blockers that have not > been touched for over a week to trivial. I have mailed reporters to a few > querying about the status but this tactic doesn't work. > > thoughts? > > -- > Daan -- Daan
