On May 26, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I > can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I > would really get some consent on this. Can you send the list of those blockers to the list with the name of the reporter ? > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland > <dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >> I will start implementing this on Monday. >> >> Also I would like to propose that nothing is a blocker unless it has been >> agreed on, on list. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08 >> To: dev >> Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs >> >> LS, >> >> There are several blocker bugs registered for 4.4 that have not been touched >> for over a week. I seems strange to me that a blocker would be left alone >> for so long and I therefor propose to reduce priority of blockers that have >> not been touched for over a week to trivial. I have mailed reporters to a >> few querying about the status but this tactic doesn't work. >> >> thoughts? >> >> -- >> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
