anks,
> Release Manager
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4621
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.7-rc0/
> [3]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1099/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.16.7-rc0
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
anks,
> Release Manager
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4622
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.17.2-rc0/
> [3]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1100/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.17.2-rc0
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
ve any other PRs want to release in the 4.18.0?
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4555
> [2] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4512
>
> Yong
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
discussion here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cvspxb4d1ryy4wo1j2k5r1qr9fcjsd42
>
> Please cast your votes and share any additional thoughts you might have.
>
> Best regards,
> Xiangying Meng
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
I think we should start with refactoring the BK client into a separate
module built with JDK 8 and then move BK to JDK 17.
FWIW this is similar to the Pulsar's JDK support for client/server parts.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:22 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> For Pulsar 4.0 (scheduled for October), we nee
ebookkeeper-1098/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.17.1-rc0
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
> Twitter: shoothzj
> Wechat: shoothzj
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
ebookkeeper-1097/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.16.6-rc0
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
> Twitter: shoothzj
> Wechat: shoothzj
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
ow-it-works/#roles
>
> Congratulations ZhangJian !
>
> Thank you for all your efforts to help the community and your contributions
> to the project !
>
> Enrico Olivelli
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
+1
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 7:38 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> BookKeeper 4.16.5 was released one and half months ago, and I would
> like to discuss the starting 4.16.6 release to include some critical
> security and bug fixes.
>
> Here are the PRs for 4.16.6:
> PR-4.16.6
> <
> https://git
+1
WDYT about adding these recent PRs:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4407
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4413
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4419
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 7:48 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> BookKeeper 4.17.0 was released one months ago, a
d help expose more problems.
>
> Thank you for considering this strategic update. I look forward to your
> feedback and further discussion.
>
> [1] [JDK 11 End of Life Update](https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013
> )
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
> Twitter: shoothzj
> Wechat: shoothzj
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
Does this new functionality do anything that is not covered by REST API?
https://bookkeeper.apache.org/docs/4.10.0/admin/http/#endpoint-apiv1autorecoverytrigger_audit
On 2023/07/10 06:34:35 Wenbing Shen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to initiate a discussion regarding the current bookie f
.
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 3:27 AM thetumbled wrote:
> Hi all,
> I create a new BP to avoid executing compaction at busy times, Looking
> forward to your feedback.
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/4382
>
> Thanks,
> Wenzhi Feng(thetumbled).
--
Andrey Yegorov
Awesome idea, thank you for tackling this.
We need to keep an eye on changes in config parameter names in yaml/configs to
avoid unexpected breaks.
So far I haven't noticed any, but it is an easy miss in a big PR.
On 2024/05/19 07:20:30 ZhangJian He wrote:
> Hi, I want to introduce new lint too
I am ok either way.
if this doesn't have default implementation it can't be included into the
4.17.x releases and will have to wait for 4.18 (breaking change, e.g. pulsar
implements MetadataClientDriver interface.)
OTOH if this is used for anything beyond tests I'd suggest default
implementati
+1 (binding)
--
Andrey
On 2024/04/30 03:05:56 thetumbled wrote:
> Hi, everyone.I would like to start voting thread for BP-66: support
> throttling for zookeeper read of rereplication.Proposal
> PR: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4258
> Implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/b
orward to your feedback.
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/4257
>
> Best Regards,
> thetumbled.
--
Andrey Yegorov
+1 (binding)
- built from tag
- built from archived sources
- ran small subset of unit tests
- ran standalone andlocalbookie from packaged bookkeeper-server
- spot-checked staged maven repo
- reviewed release notes
Release notes need double-check, I found one PR listed as a "fix" while
actually
+1 (binding)
- built from archived sources
- built from tag
- ran small set of unittests
- ran BK (localbookie and standalone) from the binaries
- reviewed release notes
Thank you!
--
Andrey
On 2024/04/03 12:43:45 Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release cand
.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4182/files
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.4-rc0/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1091
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.16.4-rc0
> [5] 16de712d8c8f1f0296697331bb68c1ad0eb5787d
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
okie.BookieShell`
> 2) Use this as the bookkeeper specification. You will also need to follow
> this specification when adding new command codes later.
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
achebookkeeper-1088
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.14.8-rc0
> [5] 965c3627328787e2750f41c2a4eda6c1d709d7c6
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
g/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.3-rc0/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1089
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.16.3-rc0
> [5] 5ca147b4a85a1044967002b3f389d17e468a264d
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
se see below for
> details
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3981#issuecomment-1617613606
>
> Andrey Yegorov 于2023年6月7日周三 06:38写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a few problems related to integration tests:
> >
> > 1. backwards compat tests did not
/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.2-rc1/
> [3]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1086/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.16.2-rc1
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
Hi,
We have a few problems related to integration tests:
1. backwards compat tests did not include recent releases.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3981 is supposed to fix that
2. Integration/backwards compat tests do not run on CI
E.g.:
mvn -B -nsu -DintegrationTests -pl :upgrade te
olunteer to release this patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3959
> [2] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3917
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
eter, diskCacheThreshold, is added. If the
>disk cache utilization exceeds the threshold, the eviction process is
>accelerated. Data is evicted to the Ledger data disk based on the order
> of
>file writes until the disk space recovers above the threshold.
> 4. A new thread, ColdStorageArchiveThread, is introduced to periodically
>evict data from the disk cache to the Ledger data disk.
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
.
>
> So I wondering someone to help/guide me or even directly handle the
> subject (or the discuss).
>
> Regards,
>
> Kannar
>
>
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
+1 (binding)
* reviewed release notes
* built from tag, Mac/Java 11
* checked signatures (ok) and checksums (ok)
* bin/bookkeeper standalone starts (from packaged binaries)
* bin/bookkeeper localbookie 3 starts (from packaged binaries)
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 9:18 PM Hang Chen wrote:
> Hi
ice.
> > > - Download the binary package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow the
> > > instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> > > - Review the maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things
> you
> > > think
> > > it is important to release.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by the
> majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Release Manager
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3882/files
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.0-rc2/
> > > [3]
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1083/
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.16.0-rc2
> > > [5] 8890a61418e3961e108b3c2e8ea176691e5f
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
binary package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow the
> > > instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> > > - Review the maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things
> you
> > > think
> > > it is important to release.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by the
> majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Release Manager
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3882/files
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.0-rc2/
> > > [3]
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1083/
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.16.0-rc2
> > > [5] 8890a61418e3961e108b3c2e8ea176691e5f
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrey Yegorov
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
t least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Release Manager
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3882/files
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.16.0-rc2/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1083/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.16.0-rc2
> [5] 8890a61418e3961e108b3c2e8ea176691e5f
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
ries that check
>
> 2. Turn the bookie into read-only mode instead of shutting it down
> before using the `bin/bookkeeper shell decommissionbookie -bookieid
> ` command to trigger commission. When replicating
> ledgers located on the decommission bookie, the ledgers can be
> replicated successfully if one replica is available.
>
> I suggest choosing the second option to tune the current bookie
> decommission process. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
151984 | 121.88 | 125.32 |
> | 5 | 154574 | 121.57 | 124.57 |
>
> The new change has a 2.2% improvement.
>
> Please leave +1/-1 in this thread to join the vote. And feel free to
> leave any concerns.
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
ory.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1080
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.4-rc0
> [5] 44f87efb8121a9f5428e7ddc70656aee85f563bf
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
n the bookkeeper service.
> > > > - Review the maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things
> > you think
> > > > it is important to release.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by the
> > majority
> > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Release Manager
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3770/files
> > > > [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.14.7-rc1/
> > > > [3]
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1079
> > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.14.7-rc1
> > > > [5] c22136b03489db1643521f586e9cae2c4a511e10
> >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
upgraded the RocksDB to
> `6.29.4.1`, which can support RocksDB upgrade to 7.9.2 and rollback to
> 6.29.4.1.
> For the RocksDB < 6.27, we can push a fix to ensure RocksDB 7.9.2 does
> not use the latest checksum type `kXXH3`
>
> I suggest doing this upgradation. Do you have any concerns?
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3734
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
rn("Failed to release a message: {}", msg, t);
> > > >>>}
> > > >>>}
> > > >>> ```
> > > >>> For example, if there is a bug to release the ByteBuf twice, whose
> > > >>> refcnt is 1, we can find out the bug quickly if we use
> > > >>> ByteBuf.release(), but the bug will be hard to find out if we use
> > > >>> `ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()`
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There are 12 PRs to refactor the ByteBuf release method, and I
> suggest
> > > >>> reverting those PRs. Do you have any ideas?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3673
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3674
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3687
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3688
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3689
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3691
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3693
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3694
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3695
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3698
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3700
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3703
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Hang
> > > >>>
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
om/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3698
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3700
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3703
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
Hi,
I've encountered an interesting segfault in prod, so far it is not a
widespread issue.
Details are at https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3734
I'd like to check with the community if anyone encountered this issue in
their environments and discuss the best approach for fixing this that
fault, because they really affect
> the
> > performance of the pulsar service, which is enough to show that we should
> > try to change it, especially some very redundant metrics created based on
> > channels.
> > Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration PlanClients that rely on PCBC
> > metrics monitoring need to pay attention to this upgrade, but this will
> not
> > affect the actual functions of the client, only the metrics data, and
> users
> > can choose to open it again.
> >
> >
> > What do you think about it?
> >
> > Best.
> > Wenbing
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
/bookkeeper/pull/3659/files
> > [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.14.6-rc1/
> > [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1077/
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.14.6-rc1
> > [5] a96884ec279f5fbcd628c7ae3791d99a8e19ca69
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
gt;>
> >> For BookKeeper's case, I suggest we remove the self-register link now
> until
> >> some contributor builds an alternative.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> tison.
> >>
> >>
> >> Andrey Yegorov 于2022年12月22日周四 11:50写道：
> &g
Hi,
Build's dead link checker caught that a link to
https://apachebookkeeper.herokuapp.com/ is dead.
Herokuapp is linked at https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/slack ("You
can self-register at ...") and currently returns error 404.
Who maintains/maintained it and knows how to fix this?
--
An
s/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.14.6-rc0/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1076/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/v4.14.6-rc0
> [5] 9f453834c6039fac46dc19130288dbf0b2996f2e
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
://bookkeeper.apache.org/releases
>
> BookKeeper 4.15.3 Release Notes are at:
>
> https://bookkeeper.apache.org/release-notes/#4153
>
> We would like to thank the contributors that made the release possible.
>
> Regards,
>
> The BookKeeper Team
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
Thank you for driving the release!
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 6:29 PM Yong Zhang
wrote:
> The vote is now closed and the release was approved with
> 4 +1s(3 bindings and 1 non-binding);
>
> Binding votes:
> * Enrico Olivelli
> * Andrey Yegorov
> * Jia Zhai
>
> Non-B
4.15 passed as well. But failed when
> > I run it with IDE.
> >
> > It looks like sometimes it uses the loopback address and we
> > are not allowed that.
> > But it shouldn't be a problem for this release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yong
> >
&
02/files>
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.15.3-rc1/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1074
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.3-rc1
> [5] 50f6820f31528fbd08aeecae89e6106ff67e7c8f
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
> > +1 (non binding)
> > > > > > Great work
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Diego Salvi 于2022年9月24日周六 00:00写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Bookkeeper Community,
> > > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on " Add a public API for creating
> > > > embeddable
> > > > > > servers."(BP-57)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is a new public API to create bookie from configuration and/or
> > > > custom
> > > > > > implementations without having to deep dive into internal
> structure.
> > > > The
> > > > > > code will be the same used to build standard BK server through
> Main
> > > > class
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is the design detail:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3494
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Diego Salvi
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
t;> fail fast, so if the channel is not writable, it will fail the
> > > request
> > > > >> as
> > > > >>>> soon as
> > > > >>>> possible and then release the memory.
> > > > >>>>
> > >
thread with a VOTE for this
> resolution.
>
> End-of-life generally means "no more releases" so:
> - no more bug fixes
> - no more security fixes
> - no patches accepted to be cherry-picked to those branches
>
> Please chime in with your thoughts
>
> Enrico
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
59c866e1976ff41ec435f53R4
> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.15.2-rc0/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1073
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.2-rc0
> [5] 3c9e4f66ab77a408fe208a3d757929527ff7bc0f
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3440/files#diff-d361215d5d5abaa96ac3362e70a1d2f80f92d369a59c866e1976ff41ec435f53
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.15.1-rc3/
> > > [3]
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1072
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.1-rc3
> > > [5] 1f930273aa329c9b04a19f27a11417624bc02954
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
e any concerns? Do you have any other issue/ticket to add
> > > for 4.16.0?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls?q=is%3Apr+bp-47+is%3Aclosed+author%3Ahangc0276
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3321
> > > [3] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3323
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3324
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
The release is completed.
Announcement:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/1w4f7q4hlfr347tc3b9j7gx67bs4xjj0
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 10:37 AM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
>
> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
>
> There are 4 approving votes, 4 of
The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version
4.15.0.
Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage
service optimized for
real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build
reliable services.
It is also the log segment st
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 4 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
* Matteo Merli (binding)
* Enrico Olivelli (binding)
* Henry Saputra (binding)
* Andrey Yegorov (binding)
There are no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
--
A
; +1 (binding)
>
> Source artifact compiled and pass tests
> Checksum files look good
> Signature file looks good
> Source artifacts does not contain executable
> LICENSE file exists
>
> Thanks,
>
> Henry
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:09 PM Andrey Yegoro
e-
> > From: Matteo Merli
> > Sent: miércoles, 4 de mayo de 2022 18:58
> > To: Bookkeeper-Dev
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.0, release candidate #2
> >
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Verified:
> > * C
Hi everyone,
The vote has been out for 5 days - any feedback?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:08 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 4.15.0,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not a
/www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
>
>
> Congratulations ZhangJian !
> Enrico
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
d by majority
> > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Release Manager
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3199/files/8691a431ae66a94009eb8607a7918c339d6d7ff9#diff-d361215d5d5abaa96ac3362e70a1d2f80f92d369a59c866e1976ff41ec435f53
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.14.5-rc0/
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1064/
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.14.5-rc0
> > >
> > >
> > > Nicolò Boschi
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
I started vote for RC2
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:55 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Fix for the failed tests:
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3251
>
> This is a test issue (not the scripts/code issue); tests didn't not run on
> CI so were
rc2/
[3]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1066/
[4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.0-rc2/
--
Andrey Yegorov
>
> > > Personally, I tend to use maven, the main reason is that we don't have
> > > active gradle experts now and gradle still has problems to solve.
> >
> > +1
> > I think we can keep Maven and remove Gradle.
> > I see no strong reason to keep Gradle,
> > it looks like the initial energy put into the migration faded away and
> > we have no one who has time to work on it
> >
> > Enrico
> >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
velli wrote:
> Il Mer 27 Apr 2022, 18:39 Andrey Yegorov ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can repro this on branch-4.15 (branch-4.14 is ok).
> >
> > The problem is these tests don't run on "mvn test" and I suspect they
> don'
dir=test_log_dir
> -Dbookkeeper.cli.log.file=test_log_file> but
> was:<-Dlog4j.configurationFile=test.conf
> -Dbookkeeper.cli.log.root.level=test_log_dir
> -Dbookkeeper.cli.log.root.appender=test_log_file
> -Dbookkeeper.cli.log.dir=INFO,TEST -Dbookkeeper.cli.log.file=>
.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.15.0-rc1/
[3]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1065/
[4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.0-rc1/
--
Andrey Yegorov
this release.
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> Andrey Yegorov 于2022年4月1日周五 23:02写道：
> >
> > ok, please cherry-pick or label PRs to cherry-pick into the release,
> > we'll have to go through RC1.
> > I tried upgrading Pulsar and enountered breaking changes listed
create a BookieService utility class to bootstrap
> the Bookie from Java as many projects do.
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
> Il giorno mer 30 mar 2022 alle ore 01:33 Andrey Yegorov
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 fo
how ASF works here:
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Congratulations Nicolò !
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
tory.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1063/
[4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/releases/tag/v4.15.0-rc0
--
Andrey Yegorov
hen we migrate to the Gradle, I think we may need to keep both
> Maven
> and Gradle for a while, until the Gradle build is stable, then we remove
> the Maven build.
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 00:41, Andrey Yegorov
> wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > My attempts to
to do this
> migration, but all the enthusiasm seems to have gone away and now we
> have a broken repository.
>
> I wonder if it would be better to roll back to Maven, we didn't
> refactor the repository and restoring the pom.xml files may not be so
> hard as fixing all the Gradle problems.
>
>
>
>
> Enrico
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
Thank you!
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 3:44 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Woot! Congrats, Andrey!
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > I am happy to announce that Andrey Yegorov joined today the Apache
> > BookKeeper PMC !
> >
> >
c from the
> website files and use an external service such as javadoc.io. IIUC we just
> need to push the JAR with the javadoc to Maven central. Then we have to
> update links from the website. We could recover the missing javadoc
> manually.
>
> Let me know what you think
>
> BR,
> Nicolò Boschi
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
people try it out, find bugs, problems, typos and fix them all
> >> > - Create the apache staging deployment (as explained here [0]).
> >> Basically
> >> > we'll need to create a github action to push to the asf-staging-site
> >> branch
> >> > and enable deployment with .asf.yaml file
> >> > - After a while, make the official switch
> >> >
> >> > WDYT ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [0]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-Stagingawebsitepreviewdomain
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > BR,
> >> > Nicolò Boschi
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > Nicolò Boschi
> >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
x27;d better remove the manual call compactRange in this PR, and
> > increase the `max_background_jobs` to accelerate auto compaction.
> >
> > Would you please give me more ideas?
> I don't have much experience with RocksDB.
>
> Did you make a prototype ?
>
> Sharing some results in a prototype would help a lot.
>
> I am not sure, but maybe we can add a option to enable/disable manual
> compaction and to tune max_background_jobs
> this way we can rollback in case of problems with your proposal
>
> Enrico
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hang
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
-release-perform.sh:mvn release:perform \
release/001-release-branch.sh:mvn release:branch \
release/002-release-prepare.sh:mvn release:prepare \
$ pwd
~/src/bookkeeper/site/scripts
$ grep -r mvn .
./javadoc-gen.sh:mvn clean install javadoc:aggregate -DskipTests
-
--
Andrey Yegorov
it's much better to verify the codebase using the
> same jdk version used in production by most of the users.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3027
>
> BR,
> Nicolò Boschi
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
ould focus on releasing other active branches cherry-picking the
> patch for SLF4J vulnerability
>
> Nicolò Boschi
>
> Il Lun 13 Dic 2021, 20:32 Andrey Yegorov ha
> scritto:
>
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1949 has merge conflicts and
> > multiple comments
ave finally reached the end of his -
> long - journey.
>
> BR,
> Nicolò Boschi
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
e:
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS
> >>>>
> >>>> Please download these packages and review this release candidate:
> >>>>
> >>>> - Download the source package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow the
> >>>> instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service.
> >>>> - Download the binary package (verify shasum, and asc) and follow the
> >>>> instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> >>>> - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things you
> >>>> think are important to a release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Matteo
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matteo Merli
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Nicolò Boschi
> >>>
> >>
>
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
to the Bookkeeper master branch. Some unit tests fail, most
> likely due to merge errors that need to be resolved.
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello folks,
> > > > > I believe it is time for cutting the 4.15 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Gradle migration is in good shape (please anyone correct me if
> I am
> > > > > wrong).
> > > > >
> > > > > The "Skip journal" BP is still in progress but we are too late on
> the
> > > > > Schedule.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Enrico
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
anually set labels and milestone
> > > > - it does not handle cherry-picks
> > > >
> > > > I propose to switch to using the GH merge button, or at least to
> allow
> > > > Committers to use it
> > > > We can write instructions for committers
files
> and updating documentation.
>
> In addition to that, that time also almost coincides with the normal
> release cycle for Bookkeeper 4.15.
>
> Kindly, do let me know your thoughts.
> Thanks and Best Regards
>
> -Prahant Kumar
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
want to create a new release 4.14.3 to address the problem. Any thought?
> If there is no objection, I can release it in the next few days.
>
> Regards,
> Yong
>
--
Andrey Yegorov
eeper/blob/efe94fa37c5fe061de668a6d11c87a1e82f8a25b/site/bps/BP-45-LedgerPayloadInterceptor.md
--
Andrey Yegorov
I am ok releasing 4.14.1 now.
I have finalized all the steps for the 4.14: updated the site etc.
I will NOT send an email about the 4.14.0 release and we'll use 4.14.1
to notify the community to limit the distribution of the build with
the blocker.
Does it sound ok to you?
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at
dated.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:07 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> We have quorum of 3 binding votes:
> +1 from Amit Chavan
> +1 from Matteo Merli (binding)
> +1 from Sijie Guo (binding)
> +1 from Enrico Olivelli (binding)
>
> I'll proceed with the
)
> > >
> > > Checked:
> > > * Signatures
> > > * Source package structure, and compile
> > > * Binary package
> > > * Running standalone bookie and client
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > >
at the moment
> > I agree that we can strip away the website, it is useless to the
> > purpose of building the project.
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> > Il giorno gio 13 mag 2021 alle ore 23:43 Andrey Yegorov
> > ha scritto:
> > >
> > > I looked at
/2714
I can either rebuild the RC or we can decide to proceed.
Gradle was not used to build/release 4.14.0
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:34 AM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> I ran the release script, as described in the release procedure.
> It all ran from the docker container.
>
> On Wed, May 12
tory and the gradle build files.
>
> - Henry
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 11:16 PM Andrey Yegorov <
> andrey.yego...@datastax.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version
> 4.14.0,
> &
I noticed that PRs are in so I built the RC0 while I had time.
Please vote on the corresponding thread.
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:15 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Matteo,
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2649 also a good candidate for
> this release (fits the compaction
eper/bookkeeper-4.14.0-rc0/
[3]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1052/
[4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commits/branch-4.14 @ sha 4729682
--
Andrey Yegorov
Matteo,
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2649 also a good candidate for
this release (fits the compaction improvements theme), also has changes
requested
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:01 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> ok, I'll hold on on the release until these two are ready to merge
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
