I think it is time to resume this conversation. It looks like the PRs we were waiting for are merged. I added a couple of PRs that fix flaky tests etc. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3032 https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3043 are the ones left at the moment.
Also there is a fix for the situation with uneven thread usage on OrderedExecutor due to ledger ids being (mostly?) even. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3023 Please let me know if you feel comfortable with this change. I'll start going through the PRs/merging what's approved next week. Please help with reviews/rebasing if needed. Assuming we don't have blocking issues it's time for the release. I'll volunteer as a release manager unless there are objections or other volunteers. I may need some help with the release, we moved to gradle and didn't update the release guide from maven. We'll see how it goes. https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/release_guide/ Action items: 1. Please review open PRs (we have 88 at the moment) and approve or request changes. Committers are welcome to merge approved PRs. 2. Reply yey/nay for the release. Let the blockers be known. 3. Reply if you want to be a release manager or ok with me doing the release. Thank you! Andrey. On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:57 AM Nicolò Boschi <boschi1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's worth to wait for > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2937, at least for 4.15 > > BTW we should focus on releasing other active branches cherry-picking the > patch for SLF4J vulnerability > > Nicolò Boschi > > Il Lun 13 Dic 2021, 20:32 Andrey Yegorov <andrey.yego...@datastax.com> ha > scritto: > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1949 has merge conflicts and > > multiple comments not addressed in almost two years. > > I don't know if we can expect Rajan to commit to getting that into a > > mergeable state fast enough. > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:03 AM Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > We'd better include this PR into 4.15 > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1949 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Hang > > > > > > Jack Vanlightly <jack.vanligh...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月13日周一 18:59写道： > > > > > > > > The original BP-44 was running without the journal but by mistake I > > also > > > > created the observability changes as BP-44 as well so I changed the > > > running > > > > without the journal to BP-46. > > > > > > > > BP-44 is all in. I have submitted the PR for BP-46 but there are test > > > > failures I need to fix, so very close there. > > > > > > > > I can get BP-46 ready for review hopefully by end of day tomorrow > > > (14th). I > > > > don't have a strong opinion either way, on waiting for that vs > cutting > > a > > > > release now. > > > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:38 AM Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I can't see any pending PR for BP-44, is it completed ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > Il giorno lun 13 dic 2021 alle ore 11:05 Prashant Kumar < > > > > > prashant.kumar.si...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > > > We are good to go. I think we are waiting for BP-44. > > > > > > If we get a green light there. We are good to go as far as I > could > > > tell. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -Prashant > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli < > > eolive...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > > I believe it is time for cutting the 4.15 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Gradle migration is in good shape (please anyone correct me > > if > > > I am > > > > > > > wrong). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The "Skip journal" BP is still in progress but we are too late > on > > > the > > > > > > > Schedule. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrey Yegorov > > > -- Andrey Yegorov
