has no member named `rate'
> make[8]: *** [lnx_io.o] Error 1
> make[8]: Leaving directory
> `/home/blarson/src2/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux'
> make[7]: *** [linux] Error 2
What kernel version are you running? Specifically, what ke
er-synaptics, or
xfree86-driver-input-synaptics, but the last one is too unnecessarily
longwinded. (I was going to package this as an XSF project, post-exams).
> > I'll package it. I'm a bit unsure about XFree configuration after
&g
00 port ...]
> [the same thingdone the day befor on sid worked ... althoughth whith a
> different video chipset]
The answer to the question you asked is that X is now called with
-nolisten tcp (I believe there is a Debconf note about this); Michel
answered your real questi
r PS/2? If it's USB, comment out the mouse driver
section that isn't using /dev/input/mice; if it's PS/2, comment out the
mouse driver section that isn't using /dev/psaux (or /dev/misc/psaux).
Cheers, and good luck!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:03:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > There is one unreachable person; IIRC, he was a reasonably major
> > contributor.
>
> Double bummer.
Aye; sort of condemns it to extern
7;re all aware of my natural aversion to any obscene
language, but could we please rename this if it goes into a branch? :)
Fun police,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fo
hile. Unreleased libraries do not belong in
> > unstable.
>
> It's not about released vs. unreleased but XFree86 vs. freedesktop.org.
And about how responsive/cluey the upstreams are, specifically.
Daniel, dreaming of source package Xu-ification (no really; it would be
a good thing).
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:15:21AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:56:20AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > Author: fabbione
> > > Date: 2003-11-10 04:56:19 -
Jim Gettys has a vague idea of
what he's doing.
Also, note I specified no timeframe. I would've ITPed it already if I
wanted it nownownow, only I don't. I want to wait until fd.o deems it
ready.
Getting tired of this,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:59:48PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I thought about the latter as well. It's not too long-winded if
x27; a tiny changelog update in under 25
minutes cares to fix this, please do.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgp7eVO84yPUm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS HEAD for Linux kernel 2.6 header
> rate/period problem; initial patch was incomplete.
Does this issue apply to the 4.3 branch, as well?
--
Daniel
and checking all the patches for any regressions
that may have occurred; I intend to start helping with this sometime
after Tuesday, in between post-exam celebrations.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X S
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an
> &g
change.
Cheers!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgpYd6GCMdJ5b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:03:59AM +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> On Nov 13, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > The second answer is "integration". The number of packaging issues
> > > which come u
ty decent order:
a) 4.3 into sarge,
b) the SDK with it,
c) xlibs/xbase-data broken up and shipping fd.o alternatives,
d) better config file handling.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://peop
ching that; I failed to scrutinize the merge closely
> enough here.
I didn't 'catch' it per se, fabbione just bitched at me on IRC because
he couldn't get XFree86 to build. ;)
FWIW, r757 (tagged 4.3.0-0pre1v4+ds1, for purely *INTERNAL* use and
reasons), built fine for me the othe
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:09:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:58:37PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:39:33AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > xfree86 (4.3.0-0pre1v4) e
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:10:12AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Thanks for catching that; I failed to scrutinize the merge closely
> > > enough here.
> >
> > I didn't 'catch' it per se, f
_CODE) && defined(KERNEL_VERSION)
# if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,5,42)
# define rate period
# endif
#endif
AFAICT, the only kernel headers on there are 2.4.21-sparc, and it should
only be tripping #define rate period if the version is >= 2.5.42 (this
is the cas
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:34:20AM +, James Troup wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAICT, the only kernel headers on there are 2.4.21-sparc, and it should
>
> Err, no. All architectures use the linux-kernel-headers package now
> and it's
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:08:43AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:00:46PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > ... or getting 4.3 into testing. Getting better Debconfiscation is
> > rightfully quite high on the list of priorities tho, IMO. My personal
> &
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:11:01AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:09:29PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > Properly backport fix from XFree86 CVS H
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:31:47AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:09:29PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:47:48PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
X (Egbert Eich).
>(Closes: #85365)
> + Sync with Type1 font rasterizer from HEAD:
>- Some minor include cleanups. (David Dawes)
> @@ -4897,3 +4904,6 @@
>$Id$
>
>vim:set ai et sts=2 sw=2 tw=78:
> +<<<<<<< .mine
> +===
X (Egbert Eich).
>(Closes: #85365)
> + Sync with Type1 font rasterizer from HEAD:
>- Some minor include cleanups. (David Dawes)
You know, I looked through svn diff's output, and I *couldn't* *see*
*an* *actual* *change*. Tell me, am I on drugs,
is one gets a +1 for wontfix from me.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgpxyqgEvdg5l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on-XFree86 packages must be doing this, and when I find out
> | who it is I am going to garrotte him.
> |
>
>
> A thousand apologies, but what do you mean 'mail this bug the output
> of:'?
"Email the output of command to [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Cheers!
y single time "make World" cleans
> everything and starts building from scratch?
I think a straight 'make' will rebuild only what's needed, and that you
only need make World the first time.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgpSIOsdKWfXJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 03:45:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:00:38PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:12:20AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> [...]
> > > @@ -4897,3 +4904,6 @@
> > &
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 03:44:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:05:44PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:12:20AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> [...]
> > > - #5303, Mo DeJong).
&g
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:44:54PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:04:24PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > * Package name: xlibs-freedesktop
> > Version : (unreleased)
> > Upstream Author : Jim Gettys <[EMAI
allen afoul of:
"The sending machine or network is located within a dynamically assigned
IP address pool, and the ISP owning that pool has a stated "no server"
policy."
in the referred page.
--
Daniel Stone<[EM
See attached - I uploaded i386 binaries, clean sid chroot using sbuild,
etc, etc.
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Stone (sbuild:i386/aedificator) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86_
gt; mizar:[/tmp] gcc -x c -o test test.cc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXinerama -lX11
> -lXext
> mizar:[/tmp]
You're right. This is an idea I vetoed, only to be smacked down because
I was wrong.
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
[...]
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
:) d
--
Daniel
> # apt-get update
> Err http://people.debian.org xfree86/ Packages
> 404 Not Found"
> etc...
i386 should be making its way to experimental very, very soon. I'll
change the NEWS.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PRO
ed it locally, but I'm busy with
AM-related stuff and KDE-Debian, so I don't quite have time to fix my
buildd so I can actually build it (needs an OpenAFS mount from another
host for more space), so I have no idea if it works cleanly yet, sorry.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgp2h7zZtUe4D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
re1v5 (i386), unless there's been some
ftpmaster action very recently. If there hasn't, I'll send them a
request to purge all xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 (i386) uploads from
queue/{unchecked,accepted}, and re-upload.
Cheers,
:) d
--
Daniel Stone
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:34:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> > [nothing of substance, annoyingly]
>
> Hi all,
> OK, so here's what happened:
> * Branden builds pre1v5 (source all powerpc), upload
ore granular linking of the
subdirectories.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:02:33AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Hi. (I'm the original author of the FreeType backend in X.Org.)
>
> This bug was introduced in revision 1.32 of ftfuncs.c[1] in XFree86
> CVS[2] on 19 October 2003 by David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This
> commit was made aga
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 02:29:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Careless blacklister alert:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host tardis.ath.cx[202.161.125.100] said: 554 Service
> unavailable; Client host [65.26.182.85] blocked using t1.dnsbl.net.au;
> 65.26.182.85 See
> http://www.dnsbl.
problem is that the modular tree, as it stands
right now, isn't quite ready right now.
So, I'm working on making it ready, by merging as many patches as
possible back, by making the build system work, et al, and then
packaging the results.
--
Daniel Stone
the code.
I sincerely hope we move to the libdl-based loader (dlloader.c) with
X.Org, rather than hauling the utter crap that is elfloader through any
more painful patch-ups.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ll /usr/X11R6. It's not quite
complete, and may well kill your system. When someone has a completed
set of X.Org debs that just need polishing and testing, you'll know
about it.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ve 1.4GB
or whatever it is, so they can't, obviously, have XFree86 on a single
disk. That's why there's symlinks, so you can do cross-device trees.
Yes, it's nasty and crap (just like the rest of the Hurd ;), but what
can you do?
--
Daniel Stone
AllowClosedownGrabs will allow users to remove the grab used by screen
saver/locker
programs. An API was written to such cases. If you enable this
option, make sure your screen saver/locker is updated.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:56:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:34:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> > > [nothing of substance, annoyingly]
> >
> > Hi all,
&
ds.
Isn't it 'release a=experimental'? Also, there's this:
for package in $(apt-cache showsrc xfree86 | grep ^Binary | cut -f2- -d: | tr
-d ,); do printf "Package: %s\nPin: release a=experimental\nPin-Priority:
600\n\n" "$package"; done >> /etc/apt/pref
format.
Uh, last time I looked, KDM used the standard KDE configuration file
format, which is:
[section]
key=value
Just like Windows .INI, it seems. :)
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian X Strike Force:http:/
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded xlibosmesa4-dbg libxft1 xprt libxi-dev xlibosmesa-dev
xlibosmesa4 xvfb libxaw7 xlibmesa-gl-dbg xdm xlibs-dev libxi6 libxt6-dbg
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
Changed-By: Daniel Stone
stream.
I believe branch's #048 came from either Michel or ATI; either way, ISTR
Michel being involved, so he may be the one to ask. Sorry for falsely
fingering you if you aren't, Michel. :)
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp8eh1mkfP6b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n a more drastic way in upstream HEAD
> (in revision 3.54 of xc/include/extensions/Imakefile)
> by removing the XIE and PEX code entirely and unconditionally.
> So this patch can be noted as being irrelevant for 4.4.0 and subsequent
> releases of XFree86.
If I&#
>
> > so LIBXCURSOR probably ends up defined to "libXcursor.so.", which is
> > consistent with the strace output (but you can verify it in a build
> > log):
>
> Yeah. Looks like I managed to not fix this bug.
The trailing dot resolved this for Chris Chene
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:05:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 04:38:04PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:30:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Yeah. Looks like I managed to not fix this bug.
> >
> > The
se who didn't know already, an upload identifying itself as
> xfree86 4.3.0-1, not authorized by me, was made by Daniel Stone to
> Debian unstable early Tuesday morning UTC. It was UNACCEPTed by katie
> at the direction of the Debian archive administrators[1], which spared
> me the trou
mobility_FireGL_7800.diff
>358924 9436 082_r128_and_radeon_vgahw_independence.diff
> 70337 2948 083_i810_do_not_reference_undefined_functions.diff
>208971 9067 084_dontvtswitch_option.diff
>
> How about I take the 04*s and the 1*s, and you take the 2*s
experimental, uploading 4.3.0-1 to unstable requires no
.orig.tar.gz. JFTR.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpvQjlSIQ4Id.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:20:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:51:48PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 00:05, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 04:38:04PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > On S
/kern.log as to why this is failing.
> I am struggling to get any meaningful information about whats not working
> here
> and why. Can someone help please?
Try kern.log?
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal opera
merged. Should apply unchanged.
I had this merged in 4.3.0-0ds1/4.3.0-0ds2 (around that time), but Mike
Harris from Red Hat told me that the patch was now completely
irrelevant, so I removed it around 4.3.0-0ds3v2-era.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL
x.diff NOT MERGED should
> apply unchanged
^^
IRRELEVANT
See previous email.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
pgpriLVyNXn1F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
upstream for
programs not from XFree86/not actively maintained there anymore.
* Start migration to Mesa 5 (the one from Mesa themselves, not this
xlibmesa crap).
* Server-only build of XFree86, eliminating the stupidly big and scary
tarball.
--
Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:00:37AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 05:15, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > * Package freedesktop.org X libraries (~50% done in my repo).
>
> Interesting, where's your repo?
You can try 'deb http://ftp-master.kde-debian
From: Andriy Skulysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!
Hello Daniel,
>You're getting this mail because SuperH doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:20:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:13:59AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Sorry I can't be of much more assistance, I'm no longer a part of the
> > Debian X Strike Force,
>
> You are as long as you continu
architecture that has
> +cropped up since linux-kernel-headers, which uses Linux 2.6
> header files, because the canonical Linux
> +kernel headers package for Build-Depends purposes. Most of my time has
> been going into preparing 4.3.0-1.
> +branden
Do you have a patch
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:05:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:50:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:27:32PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > +[29 January] XFree86 4.2.1-1
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:16:07PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:05:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:50:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:10:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:17:50PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:16:07PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
Oz license, and last I looked, we weren't
even 100% sure that was DFSG-compliant.
But yes, in general, X should be able to work without a config file. If
you want to tune stuff (and most people will), have a config file, but
it should be able to funct
uh, doesn't have a config file.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
pgpcuOzEGKeJR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e configuration as
> necessary and start coding again. I'll post something about it then.
The X autoconf stuff is not DFSG-free: it's licensed under the X-Oz
license.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
pgpIG6blQnaro.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eck your
> > blacklists, and if you're using a list with high potential collateral
> > damage, set your MTA to warn, not block.
>
> In my experience, most blacklisters are after a quick fix, not a good
> one.
So the person you were emailing was respons
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:18:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:58:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The X autoconf stuff is not DFSG-free: it's licensed under the X-Oz
> > license.
>
> After Branden's mail to -legal, I'm going to
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:15:15AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:18:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:58:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > The X autoconf stuff is not DFSG-free: it's licensed under the X-Oz
> &
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:59:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > So the person you were emailing was responsible for having the GMX
> > servers blackhole dynamic ranges, was he? Are you also responsible for
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 05:56:44PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
> 1 write(0, "(II) RADEON(0): RADEONRestoreMem"..., 50) = 50
> 1 write(0, "(II) RADEON(0): MC_FB_LOCATION"..., 48) = 48
> 1 write(0, "(II) RADEON(0): MC_AGP_LOCATIO"..., 48) = 48
> 199 nanosleep({0, 1000}, NULL)
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
> Whenever xorg input hotplugging kicks in, the evdev driver is used. The
> kbd keyboard settings from xorg.conf are ignored and the en_US keyboard
> layout is used.
Yes, this should probably be fixed up, I guess. But the long-ter
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:17:10PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:02:35PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Whenever xorg input hotplugging kicks in, the evdev driver is used. The
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:47:06PM +0200, ext Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 20:02:31 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > You were right, Julien. It was because of hal (specifically the file
> > /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/10-x11-input.fdi) that the evdev
> > driver was enable
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:55:35PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > As I've said before, the X server isn't the only user of the field. :)
> > Ubuntu were trying to move to cxkb a year or so ago, and the on
[Please keep me CC'ed if you want me to see it: I'm not subscribed.]
Hi,
I was the one who implemented the prompting, way back in the Ubuntu
days. The reason is that Ubuntu originally shipped with French Canadian
as the default, but several irritated users, as well as Jeff Bailey
(from Montréal),
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:37:22PM -0500, Zinx Verituse wrote:
> Most files (comprehensive list below) are missing in this version; this
> package is nearly unusable on x86, but I don't have the time to check other
> archs, so I'm marking it only "important".
>
> The following files are listed in
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:48:57PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>* debian/Makefile.config
> - added -lXxf86vm to XLIBS, fixes FTBFS with xorg
>* debian/control
> - added build-dep on libxxf86vm-dev
> - added dep from -dev to libxxf86vm-dev
>
> Without the -lXxf86vm the l
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:22:24PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Without the -lXxf86vm the linker failed complaining about a missing
> > > symbol (XF86VidModeQueryVersion IIRC).
> > Sounds l
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:49:11AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> - Moving the LiveCD support to -6, since it's a lower priority than
> getting our currently pending bug fixes in. Also need to investigate
> Daniel's claim that this is already supported by the cur
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:59:52PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:36:50AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:49:11AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > - Moving the LiveCD support to -6, since it
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:48:45PM +0200, David MartÃnez Moreno wrote:
> Hello to all. I would like to know who in this list has an account in
> X.Org
> upstream CVS. I count 1, Daniel Stone, as far as I know. I do not know if
> Branden has (I think that not).
>
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:48:28PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Apparently dbus has provided a session bus for X since Feb of 2004, as
> detailed in:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2004/02/msg00194.html
>
> Anyone know whether Debian's xorg is suddenly going to inherit a dbus
> d
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:23:18PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> + In the debugging X server build, change the branding string from
> "(static)" to "(non-modularized)", so people won't assume the X server
> is intended to be e.g., statically linked against libc (but
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:04:27PM +0800, Kanru Chen wrote:
> After upgraded, I am trying to restart X but got some trouble.
> I found this in changelog.Debian
> [quote]
> * Backport i810 Driver from CVS Head. Thanks Jean-Christophe Dubacq
> - Update general/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i810.diff
> - A
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:03:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 01:55 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > > Can you switch from libxaw7 to the more recent libxaw8?
> >
> > Is there a real reason for this except it
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:09:03AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Add patch general/032_static_dbg_server_hackfixes.diff. Note that this
> patch does not yet fix all FTBFS causes, but it makes a dent. I'd like to
> possibly find a better way than the hacks in here.
>
>
> +In
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 17:10 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> 2) xterm was officially split out from the upstream tree. I've heard it's
> going back in for rc1 (or the final release, whichever is first) but
> we may as well push forward with transitioning to Thomas Dickey as our
> cano
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 12:03 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> --- trunk/debian/control 2005-08-29 11:48:31 UTC (rev 562)
> +++ trunk/debian/control 2005-08-29 17:03:05 UTC (rev 563)
> @@ -2520,7 +2520,7 @@
>
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Architecture: alpha amd64 arm hpp
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 04:42 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/debian/changelog
>trunk/debian/control
> Log:
> libxaw7-dev should depend on libxp-dev. Thanks, Daniel Schepler (closes:
> #324562).
Um, the entire difference between Xaw7 and Xaw8 is that the
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 16:30 +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Please add the xvattr tool
>
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/xvattr/?topic_id=100%2C125)
>
> to xbase-clients. It's useful to tweak XV stuff at runtime without server
> restart, for instance to get xine running on the external CRTC port
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 17:25 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Daniel also said he'd send a package via email which I never got, so I
> went ahead and did my own thing. (No Matt, I'm not happy with the idea
> of fishing patches out of some random, cluttered, and very unusable
> webpage; every
801 - 900 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
