On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:56:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:34:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> > > [nothing of substance, annoyingly]
> >
> > Hi all,
> > OK, so here's what happened:
> > [stuff of substance]
> >
> > That's the situation with pre1v5 (i386), unless there's been some
> > ftpmaster action very recently. If there hasn't, I'll send them a
> > request to purge all xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 (i386) uploads from
> > queue/{unchecked,accepted}, and re-upload.
>
> Thanks very much for the exhaustive explanation.
>
> I am missing one piece of information, though -- how did 0pre1v5 (i386)
> get targeted at unstable in the first place? The debian/changelog file
> in the source package I uploaded certainly was not targeted there.I told sbuild to use it. ;) sbuild -d unstable, instead of sbuild -d experimental. Whoops. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian X Strike Force: http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgpCu4ByjgEHG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
