On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:03:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > There is one unreachable person; IIRC, he was a reasonably major > > contributor. > > Double bummer.
Aye; sort of condemns it to external DDKdom. > > I was thinking about xfree86-driver-synaptics, or > > xfree86-driver-input-synaptics, but the last one is too unnecessarily > > longwinded. (I was going to package this as an XSF project, post-exams). > > I thought about the latter as well. It's not too long-winded if we > expect having input and video modules with identical names. I can't particularly see this at the moment, but I'm sure something will rise up and prove us wrong. > Is the XFree86 driver namespace subdivided in practice (i.e., in a > name-resolution sense), or merely cosmetically via directory layout? I don't believe it's subdivided in a name-resolution sense, but I could be wrong. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_, available by the Info system." -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template
pgpUVBFp69zVA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
