Bug#548751: xserver-xorg-core: Upgrade to 2:1.6.4-1 causes segfault at startup with intel driver.

2009-09-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.6.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Recent upgrade to xserver-xorg-core_2:1.6.4-1 on amd64 with intel driver causes crash at startup of X server. -- Package-specific info: /var/lib/x11/X.roster does not exist. /var/lib/x11/X.md5s

Bug#542701: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow 2D performance on one screen of dual display until after switch to console VT and back.

2009-08-20 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.8.0-2 Severity: normal When the X server first starts up, 2D performance (such as painting the background, dragging a window, etc.) is nice and fast on my left monitor (VGA) but very slow on my right monitor (TMDS-1). I noticed by accident that this

Bug#207809: xserver-xfree86: postrm script hangs

2003-08-29 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29 Severity: normal It's hard to uninstall this package because xserver-xfree86.postrm hangs. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sp

Bug#207809: xserver-xfree86: postrm script hangs

2003-08-29 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29 Severity: normal It's hard to uninstall this package because xserver-xfree86.postrm hangs. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sp

Bug#207760: xserver-common: postrm script hangs

2003-08-29 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Package: xserver-common Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29 Severity: normal Like xserver-xfree86, the postrm script hangs. It's hard to uninstall. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc

Bug#207760: xserver-common: postrm script hangs

2003-08-29 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Package: xserver-common Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29 Severity: normal Like xserver-xfree86, the postrm script hangs. It's hard to uninstall. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc

Re: X restarts after switching from vt7 to console

2003-08-14 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ppose its a KDE- or KDM-Problem, because it does not > happen via fvwm2. Right. It seems to be a KDM + i810 problem because, of all my debian + KDE installations, only the one with the i810 suffers from this. -- Thomas E. Vaughan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: X restarts after switching from vt7 to console

2003-08-07 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ppose its a KDE- or KDM-Problem, because it does not > happen via fvwm2. Right. It seems to be a KDM + i810 problem because, of all my debian + KDE installations, only the one with the i810 suffers from this. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

no HW accel for Voodoo Banshee AGP

2001-05-13 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
*-dri packages. The *-dri packages really screw up the X server with garbage. As far as Branden's standard X packages, the display looks fine, and the X log output looks fine (no W or E messages with respect to DRI and DRM), but I definitely do not have hardware acceleration. -- Thomas E. Vaugh

no HW accel for Voodoo Banshee AGP

2001-05-13 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
*-dri packages. The *-dri packages really screw up the X server with garbage. As far as Branden's standard X packages, the display looks fine, and the X log output looks fine (no W or E messages with respect to DRI and DRM), but I definitely do not have hardware acceleration. -- Thomas E. Vaugh

Re: nvidia vm que nv_close error

2001-04-23 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
> console I see a message as follows: > > NV0: still have vm que at nv_close(): 0x4001c000 to 0x4001d00 > > I am using kernel 2.4.3. > > Of course when I use the XFree86 nv driver, anything works nice, but then > I don't get the nice hardware GL stuff. For what it

Re: nvidia vm que nv_close error

2001-04-23 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
> console I see a message as follows: > > NV0: still have vm que at nv_close(): 0x4001c000 to 0x4001d00 > > I am using kernel 2.4.3. > > Of course when I use the XFree86 nv driver, anything works nice, but then > I don't get the nice hardware GL stuff. For what it

Is HW accel for DRI possible with Voodoo3 PCI and sid debs?

2001-04-09 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
I don't see any dri/drm errors in my X server output, but 3D stuff is not hardware-accelerated. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Is HW accel for DRI possible with Voodoo3 PCI and sid debs?

2001-04-09 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
I don't see any dri/drm errors in my X server output, but 3D stuff is not hardware-accelerated. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.

2001-03-30 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
l over the screen whenever I loaded up some big textures. So I was waiting for someone to get the latest DRI stuff aptable, and I am grateful. My recent workaround has been to use the utah-glx stuff, but then I didn't get antialiased fonts in KDE. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.

2001-03-30 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
e all over the screen whenever I loaded up some big textures. So I was waiting for someone to get the latest DRI stuff aptable, and I am grateful. My recent workaround has been to use the utah-glx stuff, but then I didn't get antialiased fonts in KDE. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: new aptable cvs dri fails with mga

2001-03-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:10:04PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote: > > > > "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote: > > > > > > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x > > > DRI disabled. >

new aptable cvs dri fails with mga

2001-03-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is disabled for me. DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x DRI disabled. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bu

Re: new aptable cvs dri fails with mga

2001-03-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:10:04PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote: > > > > "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote: > > > > > > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x > > > DRI disabled.

new aptable cvs dri fails with mga

2001-03-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is disabled for me. DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x DRI disabled. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way.

Read more carefully; mine is the opposite problem.

2000-12-08 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
but now I have the OPPOSITE problem. My message indicated that now startx and xinit are the ones that WORK for me and that now xdm and gdm are the ones that DON'T WORK. I hope that I haven't angered anyone; I merely posted a message that I thought (and still think) has not been answered. -

gdm and xdm just stopped working

2000-12-08 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
): server unexpectedly died xdm error (pid 756): Server for display :0 can't be started, session disabled -- end /var/log/xdm.log-- -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Read more carefully; mine is the opposite problem.

2000-12-08 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
but now I have the OPPOSITE problem. My message indicated that now startx and xinit are the ones that WORK for me and that now xdm and gdm are the ones that DON'T WORK. I hope that I haven't angered anyone; I merely posted a message that I thought (and still think) has not been answered. -

gdm and xdm just stopped working

2000-12-08 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
): server unexpectedly died xdm error (pid 756): Server for display :0 can't be started, session disabled -- end /var/log/xdm.log-- -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of &

Re: Major texturing bugs in G400 DRI driver

2000-12-07 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
w if it's the same thing. What I have noticed is that when a polygon loses a vertex as that vertex crosses the edge of the viewport, the polygon to which that vertex belongs suddenly has its texture mapped incorrectly. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: Major texturing bugs in G400 DRI driver

2000-12-07 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
w if it's the same thing. What I have noticed is that when a polygon loses a vertex as that vertex crosses the edge of the viewport, the polygon to which that vertex belongs suddenly has its texture mapped incorrectly. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

sawfish-capplet and Nvidia's driver

2000-10-22 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
the "focus behavior" item under "sawfish" in the gnome control panel, the sawfish-capplet goes off into lala land and consumes as much CPU as it can get seemingly forever. I am using the helix debs, but I think the same problem occurs with the stock debian gnome debs. Any ideas?

sawfish-capplet and Nvidia's driver

2000-10-22 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
the "focus behavior" item under "sawfish" in the gnome control panel, the sawfish-capplet goes off into lala land and consumes as much CPU as it can get seemingly forever. I am using the helix debs, but I think the same problem occurs with the stock debian gnome debs. Any ideas?

Re: OpenGL & G400

2000-10-14 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
with the debs. Unfortunately, however, I am guessing that you won't be able to do dual-head in that case. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: OpenGL & G400

2000-10-14 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
with the debs. Unfortunately, however, I am guessing that you won't be able to do dual-head in that case. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hardware GL with a G400

2000-10-13 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ou add the following lines: Section "DRI" Mode 0666 EndSection I think that's about all I did to get hardware-accelerated OpenGL. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: Hardware GL with a G400

2000-10-13 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ou add the following lines: Section "DRI" Mode 0666 EndSection I think that's about all I did to get hardware-accelerated OpenGL. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: could not open default font

2000-10-06 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
what you recommend above. The only solution with freefont or sharefont installed seems to involve writing an explicit list of font paths into /etc/X11/XF86Config. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: could not open default font 'fixed'

2000-10-06 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
xfonts-cyrillic 4.0.1-0phase2v13 Cyrillic fonts for X ii xfonts-intl-phonetic 1.1-9 International fonts for X -- Ph ii xfonts-jmk3.0-2 James M. Knoble's character-cel ii xfonts-pex4.0.1-0phase2v13 fonts for minimal PEX support i ii xfonts-scalable 4.0.1-0phase2v13 scalable fonts for X --- -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: could not open default font

2000-10-06 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
what you recommend above. The only solution with freefont or sharefont installed seems to involve writing an explicit list of font paths into /etc/X11/XF86Config. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: could not open default font 'fixed'

2000-10-06 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
xfonts-cyrillic 4.0.1-0phase2v13 Cyrillic fonts for X ii xfonts-intl-phonetic 1.1-9 International fonts for X -- Ph ii xfonts-jmk3.0-2 James M. Knoble's character-cel ii xfonts-pex4.0.1-0phase2v13 fonts for minimal PEX support i ii xfonts

freefont and sharefont packages

2000-10-05 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
o, then is there a workaround? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

freefont and sharefont packages

2000-10-05 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
o, then is there a workaround? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-02 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
m than it is to work around Debian's not having DRI support. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-02 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
m than it is to work around Debian's not having DRI support. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anyone have debs to downgrade from phase2v11 to phase2v10?

2000-09-27 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
nd some of my X packages were accidentally upgraded to phase2v11. I'd like to downgrade them to phase2v10. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Does anyone have phase2v10 debs?

2000-09-27 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Anyone have debs to downgrade from phase2v11 to phase2v10?

2000-09-27 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
nd some of my X packages were accidentally upgraded to phase2v11. I'd like to downgrade them to phase2v10. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Does anyone have phase2v10 debs?

2000-09-27 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-26 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
hough the change-log from Linus for 2.4.0-test9-pre7 doesn't mention any changes to the dri stuff, I fetched the patch and looked at it manually. Indeed, there were some relevant changes, including the major number change from version 1 to version 2. Thank you very much for your patience and help.

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-26 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
hough the change-log from Linus for 2.4.0-test9-pre7 doesn't mention any changes to the dri stuff, I fetched the patch and looked at it manually. Indeed, there were some relevant changes, including the major number change from version 1 to version 2. Thank you very much for your patience and help.

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
is now 3.4, etc. etc. Maybe try a bleeding edge kernel? I have been using 2.4.0-test8 since it was released. I suppose that I could try a test9-preX, but has there really been much movement there with respect to the DRI for the mga? Thank you for your response. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
is now 3.4, etc. etc. Maybe try a bleeding edge kernel? I have been using 2.4.0-test8 since it was released. I suppose that I could try a test9-preX, but has there really been much movement there with respect to the DRI for the mga? Thank you for your response. -- Thomas E. Vaughan &

g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ything had been working very nicely even since the middle of phase1. Any ideas? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

g400, dri, and phase2v10

2000-09-25 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ything had been working very nicely even since the middle of phase1. Any ideas? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-24 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
s. Although this stuff is experimental and all, it has been working so wonderfully for me and my G400 that I have been happily using woody/XF4 as my primary development environment for C++/OpenGL. Needless to say, DRI is very important to me. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: READ THIS; Debian XFree86 4.0.1 mini-FAQ

2000-09-24 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
s. Although this stuff is experimental and all, it has been working so wonderfully for me and my G400 that I have been happily using woody/XF4 as my primary development environment for C++/OpenGL. Needless to say, DRI is very important to me. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/N

Re: /etc/init.d/xfs from phase1-v16 hangs my system

2000-08-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
to single-user mode? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: /etc/init.d/xfs from phase1-v16 hangs my system

2000-08-28 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
to single-user mode? -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

/etc/init.d/xfs from phase1-v16 hangs my system

2000-08-26 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ed the xfs package. Now everything is OK. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

/etc/init.d/xfs from phase1-v16 hangs my system

2000-08-26 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ed the xfs package. Now everything is OK. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug in phase1v12?

2000-08-24 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
`dependtry <= 4' failed. E: Sub-process > /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly Like me, you didn't read the README file at Branden's site for the debs. Use '--force-depends'. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: Bug in phase1v12?

2000-08-24 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
`dependtry <= 4' failed. E: Sub-process > /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly Like me, you didn't read the README file at Branden's site for the debs. Use '--force-depends'. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug in phase1v12?

2000-08-24 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ackage configuration. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: Bug in phase1v12?

2000-08-24 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
ackage configuration. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: doc-base and dpkg problems with XF-4.0.1 v12 debs

2000-08-17 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
to find by eye. I am nevertheless embarrassed to have been found in violation of one of the cardinal rules. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

Re: doc-base and dpkg problems with XF-4.0.1 v12 debs

2000-08-17 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
rd to find by eye. I am nevertheless embarrassed to have been found in violation of one of the cardinal rules. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

doc-base and dpkg problems with XF-4.0.1 v12 debs

2000-08-17 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
cking replacement xlibgl1 ... dpkg: /home/wichert/sources/dpkg-1.6.14/main/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed. Aborted This totally stumps me. Looks like I need to go back to v8 again. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

doc-base and dpkg problems with XF-4.0.1 v12 debs

2000-08-17 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
cking replacement xlibgl1 ... dpkg: /home/wichert/sources/dpkg-1.6.14/main/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed. Aborted This totally stumps me. Looks like I need to go back to v8 again. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA

FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-15 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
p://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel ----- End forwarded message - -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA GPG public key: <http://tensor.nssl.noaa.gov/~vaughan/pubkey.asc>

Re: FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-15 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
o, then does Branden include in his debs the relevant kernel module (either as compiled for some versions of the kernel or as source code)? Or are you saying that Branden's server module, the mga driver mga_drv, is inconsistent with the rest of the patched XFree 4.0.1 that Branden distribute

Re: FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-15 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:27:13PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > "Thomas E. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 8-bpp and 24-bpp depths work fine, but I need 16 bpp in order to get >> hardware acceleration for OpenGL. Downgrading to v8 sol

FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-15 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
.net/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel ----- End forwarded message - -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA GPG public key: <http://tensor.nssl.noaa.gov/~vaughan/pubkey.asc> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-15 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
o, then does Branden include in his debs the relevant kernel module (either as compiled for some versions of the kernel or as source code)? Or are you saying that Branden's server module, the mga driver mga_drv, is inconsistent with the rest of the patched XFree 4.0.1 that Branden distribute

Re: FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-15 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:27:13PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > "Thomas E. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 8-bpp and 24-bpp depths work fine, but I need 16 bpp in order to get >> hardware acceleration for OpenGL. Downgrading to v8 sol

FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-14 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
'/usr/bin/less' in an xterm window. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA GPG public key: <http://tensor.nssl.noaa.gov/~vaughan/pubkey.asc>

FONT PROBLEMS! XF4-phase1 debs, v8 -> v11, mga, 16 bpp

2000-08-14 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan
'/usr/bin/less' in an xterm window. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA GPG public key: <http://tensor.nssl.noaa.gov/~vaughan/pubkey.asc> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]