On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:40:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > * The Mesa problem (specifically, the lack of libGLU.so) really has to > be sorted out upstream if Debian is going to have a sensible handling > of Mesa in our distribution. Alternatively, I can stop shipping the > Mesa stuff altogether in the XFree86 packages until support is ready, > but this will pretty much leave DRI out of the picture. I'd appreciate > feedback on doing this. The XFree86 versions of the Mesa and OSMesa > libraries can be added into woody at a later date without causing any > real disruption. I'd appreciate feedback on the possibility of > releasing 4.0.1-1 (or 4.0.2-1, or whatever) without the XFree86 version > of Mesa.
If you do this, then please give fair warning because I want to be sure to hold back on upgrading my packages. Although this stuff is experimental and all, it has been working so wonderfully for me and my G400 that I have been happily using woody/XF4 as my primary development environment for C++/OpenGL. Needless to say, DRI is very important to me. -- Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA
