Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],,
We have checked your details on file, and we have
discovered that you could be overpaying by 317, about 23.72%
To learn more, visit us below, we have helped
millions and we can help you too!
http://in.geocities.com/cody81338domenic73291/
Goodbye,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Teri
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345477: fixed in xterm 208-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347553: fixed in xterm 208-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348615: fixed in xterm 208-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-01-17 21:31:12 -0500 (Tue, 17 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 1088
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
* Remove resize from xutils description. This program has been moved to the
xterm package as of Xorg 6.9 and xterm 208-3.
Modified: trunk/debi
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-01-17 21:26:25 -0500 (Tue, 17 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 1087
Modified:
branches/modular/app/xterm/debian/changelog
branches/modular/app/xterm/debian/control
branches/modular/app/xterm/debian/xterm.install
Log:
* Install everything in /usr/bin, /etc/X11/app-defaul
Package: xutils
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: important
Description of this package claims this package should have a command
called "resize". But it is no more there! So, where the fsck is it now?
Where did it go to?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers te
Hows it been going, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have opened our new Iicenced store.
http://stettner2000.com/?aid=6
Get back to you later,
Jonah J.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hows it been going, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have opened our new Iicenced store.
http://stettner2000.com/?aid=6
Bye,
Robby Grisham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xlibs
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: important
Hi,
Since xorg 6.9.0, dead_circumflex is no more a dead key (i.e pressing ^
then e will print ^e instead of ê) and dead_diaeresis doesn't work
anymore.
This bug seems to be a lot like #347690 but with the fr layout.
here are somme more
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:44:24PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > I see. Keeping the DRI drivers in their own package would probably be
> > nice, how about libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL and libgl1-mesa-dri for the
> > drivers?
>
> For w
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #345758
Hello,
I did try the OldDmaInit option but unfortunatly it does not seems to
work here:
% glxinfo | grep "direct rendering"
direct rendering: No
I'm using a Matrox G550 video card without the mga_hal module.
-- P
Package: xlibs
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
After upgrade xlibs from version 6.8.2 to version 6.9.0, layout
czsk (that I use) stops function.
~$ setxkbmap -model pc104 -layout czsk -print | xkbcomp -w0
-I/etc/X11/xkb - :0 Error:No Symbols named
"shift_toggle" in the include file "group"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348457 +upstream
Bug#348457: open ttydev: No such device or address ; xterm should call
TIOCSCTTY on GNU systems
Tags were: patch
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 03:44 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from
> > > Marcelo?), but I still don't like
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:10 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
>
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:41:06 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:41 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> >>
> >> [...] what should I do for the DRI bug?
> >
> > There is no bug, this is the reason why Option "AGPFastWrite"
>
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 03:44 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from
> > Marcelo?), but I still don't like the package naming as currently in
> > xorg SVN. I think something lik
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:36:53AM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> This time has arrived. :-)
>
> Could you please report if your bug was fixed with the latest 6.9 release?
I installed the most recent xorg in Sid, and I could still reproduce the
crash in the same way as before.
ii xserver
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:09:55PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Yes, but you don't want to depend on accelerated framebuffer drivers,
> > particularly if you want to use accelerated X. In addition, most of the
> > X drivers are unmai
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:39:11PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:09:55PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Yes, but you don't want to depend on accelerated framebuffer drivers,
> > > particularly if you want t
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:09:55PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:02:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > The description also says it only works on i386 (including AMD64 I
> > > presume) and ppc.
> >
> > Well
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:02:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The description also says it only works on i386 (including AMD64 I
> > presume) and ppc.
>
> Well, the ppc uses the OF device-tree, and if this doesn't work falls back to
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 12:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected
> > > > monitor, and allow you to set the resolution
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected
> > monitor, and allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor.
>
> Despite the danger of stating the o
hello sir, plz get me the details for placement and controlling of two mouse pointers on a single monitor with two mouse or two joysticks. each joystick having control on each pointer on the same screen... thanking u.. From: JEETHENDRA. P ADA Bangalore. INDIA. Send instant message
Hi all,
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> I haven't been seeing it with x.org 6.9 packages built with recent
> gcc's, but I assume this just means the code has stopped tickling the
> underlying bug in the crusoe code morpher.
My problems had disappeared for a while since Xorg was here. But, since
Xorg 6.9 I a
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:25:31AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:22:06AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Um, neither does xserver-xorg.{config,postinst,templates}. So there's
> > >> not much point until those get fixed. I'
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Full ack in the context of X configuration.
> But, in the context of potential use of xresprobe for autodetection when
> booting the (graphical) installer (as Sven hinted at), non DCC compliant
> hardware also needs to be supported.
xr
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 12:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected
> > > monitor, and allow you to set the resolutions supported by the
> > > monitor.
> I fail to understand your poin
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:22:06AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Um, neither does xserver-xorg.{config,postinst,templates}. So there's
> >> not much point until those get fixed. I've been meaning to do it, but
> >> never got around to it. (Don't cou
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Um, neither does xserver-xorg.{config,postinst,templates}. So there's
>> not much point until those get fixed. I've been meaning to do it, but
>> never got around to it. (Don't count on me doing it, seriously.)
>
> I may do it on the purely xresprobe l
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:48:15AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected monitor,
> > and
> > allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor. We may consider
> > usin
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected
> > monitor, and allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor.
>
> Despite the danger of stating the o
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:37, Sven Luther wrote:
> xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected
> monitor, and allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor.
Despite the danger of stating the obvious...
Note though that it is limited to laptop displays and DDC
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected monitor, and
> allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor. We may consider
> using it already in g-i, since it would allow to set the framebuffer size or
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:32:36PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> xresprobe is a new one to me, I'll make tasksel start installing it
> before X in the next upload unless someone tells me differently.
xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected monitor, and
allow you to set the res
36 matches
Mail list logo
