On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 03:44 +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from > > > Marcelo?), but I still don't like the package naming as currently in > > > xorg SVN. I think something like libgl1-mesa-(sw)x11 would be more > > > accurate than libgl1-mesa-swrast, but I absolutely don't see the point > > > of going through the pain of renaming libgl1-mesa-dri to libgl1-mesa, as > > > the former is more accurate. > > > > +1 on moving libgl1-mesa-swrast to libgl1-mesa-swx11. > > Cool, and thanks to David who already changed it.
My pleasure. > > As for -dri and -mesa, the only reason why that happened is because I > > already had libgl1-mesa for the library and libgl1-mesa-dri for the > > modules in my tree before Marcelo did 6.4.x. To be honest, I don't > > care either way. > > I see. Keeping the DRI drivers in their own package would probably be > nice, how about libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL and libgl1-mesa-dri for the > drivers? For what it's worth, I like this and I can make the change quickly[0] if Daniel likes it too. - David Nusinow [0] Although maybe not too quickly. The GPLv3 festivities are still in full swing around here and I've been spending some time with our SVN repo maintainer :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
