On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 03:44 +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from > > Marcelo?), but I still don't like the package naming as currently in > > xorg SVN. I think something like libgl1-mesa-(sw)x11 would be more > > accurate than libgl1-mesa-swrast, but I absolutely don't see the point > > of going through the pain of renaming libgl1-mesa-dri to libgl1-mesa, as > > the former is more accurate. > > +1 on moving libgl1-mesa-swrast to libgl1-mesa-swx11.
Cool, and thanks to David who already changed it. > As for -dri and -mesa, the only reason why that happened is because I > already had libgl1-mesa for the library and libgl1-mesa-dri for the > modules in my tree before Marcelo did 6.4.x. To be honest, I don't > care either way. I see. Keeping the DRI drivers in their own package would probably be nice, how about libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL and libgl1-mesa-dri for the drivers? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
