Control: retitle -1 www.debian.org/Bugs should get tags from BTS
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:13:41 + Simon McVittie wrote:
To reproduce:
- look at the list of valid tags in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/
- see that trixie, trixie-ignore, forky and forky-ignore are in the list
- try to tag a
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 www.debian.org/Bugs should get tags from BTS
Bug #1028530 [bugs.debian.org,www.debian.org] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ says
tag 'forky' exists, bugs.debian.org says it does not
Changed Bug title to 'www.debian.org/Bugs should get t
On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 14:06 +, Christian Buhtz wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
>
> It lacks the information that all on that site described commands need to have
> a "Control: " string in front of them.
FTR, the Control pseudo-header is d
Hi Christian,
While improving the current doc can always happen, I'm not sure I agree
with your assessment that critical information is missing…
Christian Buhtz (2023-01-20):
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control […]
The very first line mentions writing those mails
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
it is about this part of your website.
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
It lacks the information that all on that site described commands need to have
a "Control: " string in front of them. Otherwise they are useles
Package: bugs.debian.org,www.debian.org
Severity: minor
To reproduce:
- look at the list of valid tags in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/
- see that trixie, trixie-ignore, forky and forky-ignore are in the list
- try to tag a bug "+ trixie forky" (I tried to do this in #885563)
Expec
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:19:27 +0100
with message-id <24539.26863.548035.51...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #799602,
regarding www.debian.org: language not preserved by links in
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ pages
to be marked a
Your message dated Fri, 3 Jan 2020 18:47:08 +0100
with message-id <22e46d2e-0684-7b6e-b27a-e1cc48aca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: www.debian.org:
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities inconsistency between English
and French
has caused the Debian Bug report #799704,
reg
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:37:42 +0200 Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities says:
>
> important
> a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package,
> without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.
>
> https:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user www.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to www.debian@packages.debian.org (was larj...@debian.org).
> usertags 922526 scripts
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: scripts.
> usertags 911896 content
There were no usertags
Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:35:07 +
with message-id <5c69b76b6e71a_3ad2af2c2ced0d09...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #910676 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #910676,
regarding link to search in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ not working
Hi,
Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hello again
> Diff attached with the proposal change for /english/Bugs/index.wml
> (remove the current paragraph, add a new paragraph linking to UDD search).
>
> If there are no objections, I will commit it in some days.
I wasn't aware of that search method.
Yes,
Hello again
Diff attached with the proposal change for /english/Bugs/index.wml
(remove the current paragraph, add a new paragraph linking to UDD search).
If there are no objections, I will commit it in some days.
Cheers
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
diff --git a/engli
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The page https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ includes a line "You can search
bug reports using our HyperEstraier based search engine." with a link to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi which redirects to
http://bugs-search.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Could it simply follow the accepted modern convention in a text box?
>
> sudo apt-get install reportbug
> reportbug
I believe what I have done is better for several reasons:
Modern desktops de-emphasise the command-line and many users probably
On 07/04/18 13:19, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
Good ideas, maybe someone from debian project?
Anyone can edit the wiki, it doesn't require Debian membership.
That is, how to make it clearer to users to install the bugreport tool and
report issues?
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Good ideas, maybe someone from debian project?
Anyone can edit the wiki, it doesn't require Debian membership.
> That is, how to make it clearer to users to install the bugreport tool and
> report issues?
I've made some changes that improve t
wiki page?
Once that is done, we can remove the install instructions from the bugs
page and link to the new wiki page.
Paul
Good ideas, maybe someone from debian project?
I'm only able to support the issue I raised on
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
That is, how to make it clea
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 14:04 +0100, Jonny Grant wrote:
> I feel this is much clearer.
The proposal is a good start, however:
I don't think the instructions for how to install a package belong on
the page about reporting bugs. Debian doesn't appear to have an
existing page about how to install pac
On 05/04/18 13:28, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
Based on this, would debian follow a modern approach? We're in 2018, not 2001!
We don't have any web-based package managers AFAIK ;)
How about this?
reportbug is installed by default so you should be ab
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Based on this, would debian follow a modern approach? We're in 2018, not 2001!
We don't have any web-based package managers AFAIK ;)
How about this?
reportbug is installed by default so you should be able to start
reportbug from the "System"
On 04/04/18 14:28, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
Hello Jonny
El 04/04/18 a las 13:40, Jonny Grant escribió:
Hello
There is a mistake "sudo" is missing
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Thanks for caring about the Debian website.
Thank you for your reply Laura
=
W
Hello Jonny
El 04/04/18 a las 13:40, Jonny Grant escribió:
> Hello
>
> There is a mistake "sudo" is missing
>
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
>
Thanks for caring about the Debian website.
> =
> We strongly recommend that you report bugs in Debian
Hello
There is a mistake "sudo" is missing
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
=
We strongly recommend that you report bugs in Debian using the reportbug
program. To install and start it, simply run:
# apt-get install reportbug
$ reportbug
==
Bette
Hi Laura,
Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hi
>
> El 31/03/16 a las 23:04, Holger Wansing escribió:
> I've had a look at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/index and in that file
> the newcomer tag is present, but not in server-control
Hmm, this statement is correct for localized pag
Hi
El 31/03/16 a las 23:04, Holger Wansing escribió:
> Ping ?
>
I've had a look at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/index and in that file
the newcomer tag is present, but not in server-control
I've had a look at the Makefile and I don't understand it very well, but
it seem
Ping ?
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> I have committed the fix yesterday, but it is still not visible on the
> website.
> Could someone trigger a full rebuild of the website, please?
> This seems to be needed, to get the fix onto the webpages.
--
===
Hi,
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> > > reassign 805120 www.debian.org
> > Bug #805120 [bugs.debian.org] bugs.debian.org:
> > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-contr
bugs.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not
document "newcomer" tag
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the probl
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities says:
important
a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package,
without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.fr.html
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Links in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ should preserve the language,
but this is not always the case. For instance,
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control.en.html
has a link "their meanings" to
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#
Hi,
Bram Diederik wrote:
> Searching bug reports,
> You can search bug reports using our HyperEstraier based search
> engine. => http://bugs.debian.org/cgi/search.cgi =>
> The requested URL /cgi/search.cgi was not found on this server.
This is a known problem.
Holger
--
= = = = = = = = = =
Hi, there is a dead link on the bugs page at the HyperEstraier url..
Searching bug reports,
You can search bug reports using our HyperEstraier based search
engine. => http://bugs.debian.org/cgi/search.cgi =>
The requested URL /cgi/search.cgi was not found on this server.
cheers,
Bram
--
To U
Your message dated Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:42:55 -0400
with message-id <4dafa7bf.9080...@tilapin.org>
and subject line Reporting: no reference to "other documentation"
has caused the Debian Bug report #167746,
regarding www.debian.org: Bugs: Reporting: unprecise reference to "oth
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, Carl Worth wrote:
> [Though, as an off-topic aside here, I do find it confusing as a
> user that various pieces of BTS functionality are split among
> submit@, control@, and request@ sometimes with different syntax for
> the same operation (contrast adding a tag to an original
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 09:33 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009, Carl Worth wrote:
> > By avoiding putting the text here we can also ensure that the
> > candidate knows how to search deep into Debian's mail archives and
> > find the original announcement of the usertag feature.
>
> Y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 351746 Document usertag explanation and user categories on a separate
> page with links from server-control and server-request
Bug #351746 [www.debian.org] Include usertag explanation on
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
C
006-02-07 04:31]:
> > > Today I was searching how to use the usertag command. My first step was
> > > going to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control and try finding an
> > > example of usertag. However, usertag is not mentioned on this page.
> > > Could be go
On Fri, 15 May 2009 18:01:37 +0200 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Nelson A. de Oliveira [2006-02-07 04:31]:
> > Today I was searching how to use the usertag command. My first step was
> > going to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control and try finding an
> > example of user
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [2006-02-07 04:31]:
> Today I was searching how to use the usertag command. My first step was
> going to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control and try finding an
> example of usertag. However, usertag is not mentioned on this page.
> Could be good to inc
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:38:59PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > For some reason (CSS?) the above URL ends up rendering with different
> > fonts in different parts of the page; specifically, the elements
> > under "Bug tracking system documentation" are
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:38:59PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> For some reason (CSS?) the above URL ends up rendering with different
> fonts in different parts of the page; specifically, the elements
> under "Bug tracking system documentation" are in a different font from
> the rest of the bo
For some reason (CSS?) the above URL ends up rendering with different fonts
in different parts of the page; specifically, the elements under "Bug
tracking system documentation" are in a different font from the rest of the
body text, and confusingly the links are rendered bold when they have not
Your message dated Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:22:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#497783: www.debian.org/Bugs: Selecting bug reports on
the WWW not possible in the german translation
has caused the Debian Bug report #497783,
regarding www.debian.org/Bugs: Sel
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
Hello,
I just discovered the bug selection section of the german translation of
the BTS index page to be unusable. Apparently the page is not generated
correctly. The following HTML-code contains tags that were supposed to
be expanded into val
[ CC'ing you as I don't know whether you have subscribed to the list. ]
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 11:54:16AM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> nowner is an invalid command, please fix typo in page at
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control with the following
> patch.
D
d.
nowner is an invalid command, please fix typo in page at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control with the following
patch.
--- server-control~ 2008-02-04 13:28:54.0 +1100
+++ server-control 2008-03-08 11:49:39.960779802 +1100
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
thanks
Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:53:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#437431: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control:
incorrect link to anchor
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
In http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control:
The link to the tag command in the list "Commands available at the control
mailserver" refers to but the anchor is actually named . The link and the link text should be changed to "tags&
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:05:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Übersetzung von »severity« / Translation of »severity«
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:06:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#49960: -> www.debian.org
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting: It is not clear how/if bugs are
forwarded upstream
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
While reporting several bugs I often wondered
Your message dated Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:04:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398099: Typo in french translation of
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#requestserv
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Hi,
In the french translation of
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#requestserv :
"...la ligne Subject, et le l'en-tête Reply-To sera ..."
should be
"...la ligne Subject, et l'en-tête Reply-To sera ..."
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:40:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384704: Wrong es translation in
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control.es.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
The text:
If no version is given, then the list of fixed versions for the
bug is cleared. This is identical to the behaviour of reopen.
Is wrongly translated as:
Si no se da una versión, entonces la lista de versiones
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/number
> http://bugs.debian.org/mbox:number
> http://bugs.debian.org/package
> http://bugs.debian.org/src:sourcepackage
> http://bugs.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://bugs.debian.org/from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http:/
--text follows this line--
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello everybody,
in the web page http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
i.e. in the (source?) file http://www.debian.org/Bugs/index.en.html
the list that explains how to make a query by visiting URLs of the following
forms is out of date
On Friday 26 May 2006 10:53, Don Armstrong wrote:
> This patch fixes #337700.
Thanks, I've applied your patch with minor typo and HTML syntax fixes.
Cheers,
--
Tobias
Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux.
pgpMIQ6Zmz9Qn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This patch fixes #337700.
Don Armstrong
--
There is no mechanical problem so difficult that it cannot be solved
by brute strength and ignorance.
-- William's Law
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Index: Developer.wml
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 22:01, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> > You've mentioned that the patch fixes "a bunch of open bugs",
> > however, I could only find one (#337327, www.d.o/Bugs/server-control
> > doesn't mention "block by"). Could you please close the re
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 08:56, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The following patches fix a bunch of open bugs against the BTS and
> > sync (for the most part) the b.d.o documentation up with the
> > documentation that is actually in debbugs.
> >
> > If there ar
On Thursday 18 May 2006 08:56, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The following patches fix a bunch of open bugs against the BTS and
> sync (for the most part) the b.d.o documentation up with the
> documentation that is actually in debbugs.
>
> If there are any questions, please let me know.
Hi,
since you di
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:56:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The following patches fix a bunch of open bugs against the BTS and
> > sync (for the most part) the b.d.o documentation up with the
> > documentation that is actually in debbugs.
> >
> > If
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:56:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The following patches fix a bunch of open bugs against the BTS and
> sync (for the most part) the b.d.o documentation up with the
> documentation that is actually in debbugs.
>
> If there are any questions, please let me know.
Do yo
The following patches fix a bunch of open bugs against the BTS and
sync (for the most part) the b.d.o documentation up with the
documentation that is actually in debbugs.
If there are any questions, please let me know.
Don Armstrong
--
"Facts" are the refuge of people unwilling to reassess wha
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:42:59AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:51:00PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > There are in fact other glitches -- like "Dringlichkeit" (urgency),
>
> I changed this to be consistent in this one page, but there are really
> many other whe
Your message dated Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:48:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #359791,
regarding www.debian.org: Bugs [l10n/de]: wrong translation of "severity"
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) &
Hi Nikolaus,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:51:00PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> the german translation of the bug search mask gets "severity" wrong:
> "Schwierigkeitsgrad" (roughly: degree of difficulty) should be
> "Schweregrad" (severity).
You're right, thanks, I fixed it.
> I'm filing this
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Hello,
the german translation of the bug search mask gets "severity" wrong:
"Schwierigkeitsgrad" (roughly: degree of difficulty) should be
"Schweregrad" (severity).
I'm filing this as minor since it's not difficult to guess the intended
meanin
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Today I was searching how to use the usertag command. My first step was
going to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control and try finding an
example of usertag. However, usertag is not mentioned on this page.
Could be good to include it with some
"domyślnie" or similar.
>
> Thanks. I've just commited fixed version. Should be available shortly.
>
> regards
> fEnIo
Hej,
czy byłbyś jeszcze tak uprzejmy i poprosił kogoś o poprawienie:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/:
atywne -> aktywne
?
Nie mam pojęcia na co wpi
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:12:38PM +0100, Robert Gomułka wrote:
> Hello,
Hi.
> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report such bug. But
> I don't know other places, so in the case this is wrong please pass
> it to proper person.
Proper way for reporting such bugs would be our bts, but
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report such bug. But I don't know
other places, so in the case this is wrong please pass it to proper person.
"By default" translated as "domyślne", while it should take form "domyślnie"
or similar.
Regards,
Robert
W pols
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:12:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324690: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting contains dead
link
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
the page http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting contains an reference to
the debbugs-el package (http://packages.debian.org/stable/utils/debbugs-el).
This link is dead.
And debbugs-el (http
ver.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id 5A62C5F48; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:47:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Forwared-tag not listed on
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
X-Mai
Hello Adam,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:03:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:47 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > the forward tag is used but not documented along the lines of the
> > other in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
>
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:47 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> the forward tag is used but not documented along the lines of the
> other in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
`forwarded' *isn't* a tag, which is why it isn't listed in the tags
section. It'
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-04-11
Severity: minor
Hello,
the forward tag is used but not documented along the lines of the
other in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
Indirectly it is referenced later on on this page.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:17:26PM +0200, Erik Schnetter wrote:
> On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control I then found out how I
> could close it, namely with the "close" instruction, but also that this
> instruction was deprecated. However, there was no other instru
interface, but there is apparently none.
On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control I then found out how I
could close it, namely with the "close" instruction, but also that this
instruction was deprecated. However, there was no other instruction
that would close the bug. I
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:54:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
* Frédéric Bothamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-03 03:11] :
> * Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 13:20] :
> > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Anybody mind if I commit the following 2 patches (one for Bugs/*.wml,
> > > one for po/bugs.p
* Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 13:20] :
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
[...]
> > Anybody mind if I commit the following 2 patches (one for Bugs/*.wml,
> > one for po/bugs.pot)?
>
> Please do (though you'll probably have to regenerate them, since
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 10:55] :
> > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian
> >
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
> I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian
> BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this:
>
> Index: Developer.wml
> ===
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 10:55] :
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian
> > BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this:
>
> Don't fo
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian
> BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this:
Don't forget Bugs/server-refcard.wml
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,
I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian
BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this:
Index: Developer.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/Developer.wml,v
retrieving
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 234802 bugs.debian.org
Bug#234802: www.debian.org/Bugs: Search by submitter email is case sensitive
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `bugs.debian.org'.
> merge 89569 234802
Bug#89569: Search by submitter is ca
reassign 234802 bugs.debian.org
merge 89569 234802
thanks
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:20:34PM -0500, Arun A. Tharuvai wrote:
> Searches by submitter email should be case-insensitive.
Moving this to the bugs.debian.org pseudo package and merging it with the
existing bugs.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichte
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I attempted to search for all the open bug reports I had submitted by
going to http://www.debian.org/Bugs. When typing in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(all lowercase), I found that a bug that I had submitted against
ctwm hadn't shown up. When searching
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:48:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229070: Link on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 225416 www.debian.org
Bug#225416: 404 link in bugs.debian.org/
Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'.
> merge 225416 229070
Bug#225416: 404 link in bugs.debian.org/
Bug#229070: Link on http://www
reassign 225416 www.debian.org
merge 225416 229070
thanks
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:59:22PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> On german page of http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ the link
> "Fehlerdatenbank-Howto" to
> http://people.debian.org/~moshez/bts-howto.html is broken.
This w
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
On german page of http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ the link
"Fehlerdatenbank-Howto" to
http://people.debian.org/~moshez/bts-howto.html is broken.
Error 404.
Bye,
Erik
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i
> > same page. Using bug number on this page also fails, but
> > http://bugs.debian.org/number works.
>
> They seem to work for me. Could I have more details?
>
> (Also, http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ is actually run by the web team,
> cc:ed.)
>
> Cheers,
>
bugs.debian.org/number works.
They seem to work for me. Could I have more details?
(Also, http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ is actually run by the web team,
cc:ed.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:26:27PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld said:
>
> > * #176437: www.debian.org: URL checker not checking
> >Package: www.debian.org; Reported by: Larry Gilbert
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 214 days old.
> >
> > Has anyone the scripts that wh
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
