On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 10:55] : > > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian > > > BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this: > > > > Don't forget Bugs/server-refcard.wml > > Ok, I have looked in the directory Bugs/ and found some interestings > things. > > The complete list of tags is currently: > potato, woody, sarge, sarge-ignore, sid, experimental, confirmed, d-i, > fixed, fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream, help, l10n, moreinfo, > patch, pending, security, unreproducible, upstream, wontfix, ipv6, lfs. > > The page Developer.wml is missing the following tags: > fixed-in-experimental and l10n. > > The page server-refcard.wml is missing the following tags: sarge-ignore, > confirmed, d-i, fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream, l10n, ipv6 and > lfs. > > The page server-control.wml is missing the following tags: sarge-ignore, > fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream and l10n. > > The page pkgreport-opts.inc (used to build the BTS search page) is > missing the following tags: ipv6 and lfs (though URLs with tag=lfs > seem to work, i.e. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=no&pkg=yencode&tag=lfs). > > Anybody mind if I commit the following 2 patches (one for Bugs/*.wml, > one for po/bugs.pot)?
Please do (though you'll probably have to regenerate them, since they'll conflict with the changes I just made). -- Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ftbfs.org/
