Bug#723069: [www.debian.org] /misc/children-distros: broken link to Impi Linux

ggest to merge the page with the information in the wiki, which would ease contributions. -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Bug#721687: [www.debian.org] French: "Release Info" translated to "Dernière version"

shorter and equally informative... specifying that the target page contains information is rather unhelpful, so I'd recommend to change the English label to just "Releases". -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists

Bug#721114: [www.debian.org] /doc/index.fr.html: Broken link to "documents d'intérêt historique"

Bonjour Baptiste, On 2013-08-29 06:12, Baptiste Jammet wrote: Control: tags -1 patch Bonjour, Le 28/08/2013 07:48, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : http://www.debian.org/doc/index.fr.html has a broken link to an anchor on "documents d'intérêt historique". This link was removed in

Bug#721307: [www.debian.org] Refers to prospective members as "prospective developers"

y, "debian" should be capitalized later in the last paragraph. -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com

Bug#721283: [www.debian.org] Please mention Bytemark's donation

/equipment_donations.en.html Both appear as "development and service partners", but if it's intended to keep business already listed there out of equipment_donations, I guess the former should be more prominent than the latter on http://www.debian.org/donations.en.html -- Filipu

Bug#721116: [www.debian.org] /doc/: half-broken link to refcards.com

I recommend to remove this link. -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com

Bug#721114: [www.debian.org] /doc/index.fr.html: Broken link to "documents d'intérêt historique"

nscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/doc/index.wml?r1=1.83&r2=1.84 vs http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/french/doc/index.wml?r1=1.46&r2=1.47 -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#720745: [www.debian.org] Support - On-line Real Time Help Using IRC: Please mention OFTC WebChat

ounts greater than any of the clients currently mentioned, support IRC. -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://l

Bug#720742: [www.debian.org] Confusing qualifiers for people on intro/organization ("current" *and* "member")

ier for each item. Perhaps some technical constraint is forcing every item to have a qualifier, so "member" is used as a dummy qualifier? That may be the root cause of the problem. -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com

Bug#709685: [www.debian.org] Reporting.fr.html: "Setting Forwarded" translated to "Configurer le transfert"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: taf...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#tags contains: Setting Forwarded Forwarded:f...@example.com will mark the newly submitted bug as forwarded to f...@exa

Bug#707666: fixed

Hi Cédric, On 2013-05-10 18:24, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi! This has just been fixed in the CVS repo. Thank you Could you please next time attach a patch, even if it is as simple an issue as this one? I technically can, but I'm afraid that's not going to happen a lot in practice. Prepari

Bug#707666: [www.debian.org] French: The Debian Live project - "contactées" should be singular

and "contactées" should also be singular, without an "s": "contactée". By the way, "peut-être" is not an adverb in the sentence above (should read "peut être"). -- Filipus Klutiero http://www.philippecloutier.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#705410: closing 705410

reopen 705410 thanks Hi David, On 2013-04-14 11:04, David Prévot wrote: # BTS abuse, as usual… close 705410 thanks do not close tickets before the problem reported has been addressed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#705410: [www.debian.org] Platform for Lucas Nussbaum - French: "expect" mistranslated in item on developer documentation

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n X-Debbugs-Cc: taf...@debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/vote/2013/platforms/lucas.fr.html contains: Comment pouvons-nous attendre que les développeurs restent si la documentation n'est pas satisfaisante

Bug#705024: [www.debian.org] Bug control: affects documentation - "the package list of package"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor X-Debbbugs-Cc: ow...@bugs.debian.org http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control.en.html#affects starts with: Indicates that a bug affects another package. In the case where bugnumber causes breakage in package even though the bug is actually present in the

Bug#703248: [www.debian.org] proposed-updates.fr: "équipe de publication de la version stable"

On 2013-03-24 23:36, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi Christian, On 2013-03-18 02:10, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com): [...] Where have you seen that Debian Stable Release Team is more Debian Stable Releases' Team more than Debian Stable's Release T

Bug#705021: [www.debian.org] References to undefined "Stable Release Team"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: pk...@debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: 703...@bugs.debian.org Several pages refer to "the Stable release team", like http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates.html http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developer-duties.html#ma

Bug#704844: [wiki.debian.org] French interface: broken links for edit help (HelpOnEditing, HelpOnMoinWikiSyntax)

Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: l10n When editing a page, information to help editing is shown at the bottom. At the very bottom a paragraph links to more information. The English version reads: (!) For more help, see HelpO

Bug#703248: [www.debian.org] proposed-updates.fr: "équipe de publication de la version stable"

Hi Christian, On 2013-03-18 02:10, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com): Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates.fr.html contains: L'équi

Bug#703248: [www.debian.org] proposed-updates.fr: "équipe de publication de la version stable"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates.fr.html contains: L'équipe de publication de la version stable de Debian vérifie régulièrement les paquets dans p-u-new (ou o-p-u-new) et décide d

Bug#701938: [www.debian.org] Debian Trademarks: Branden Robinson presented as DPL

reopen 701938 thanks Hi David, On 2013-02-28 19:01, David Prévot wrote: Le 28/02/2013 19:48, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : http://www.debian.org/trademark.en.html contains: The Debian UK Society, by Branden Robinson <http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/08/msg00280.html>,

Bug#701938: [www.debian.org] Debian Trademarks: Branden Robinson presented as DPL

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/trademark.en.html contains: The Debian UK Society, by Branden Robinson , Debian Project Leader. Branden Robinson was DPL from April 2005 to April 2006, but no longer i

Bug#701579: [wiki.debian.org] Top tabs highlight overlaps with top links in default theme

Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: minor I recently switched to the "new" theme on Debian's wiki. I realized there is now an overlap between the 2 first top horizontal bars. The first bar contains for anonymous a "Login" link. The second bar contains "FrontPage", "FindPage" and "HelpContents"

Bug#700193: [www.debian.org] French: "Le coin des nouveaux membres Debian" claims each DD can connect to most Debian systems

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: l10n X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint.fr.html contains: Chaque développeur Debian : * est membre du projet Debian ; * peut voter sur les questions qui concernent le projet en entier ;

Bug#700192: [www.debian.org] Debian New Members Corner: claims every member "has upload permissions for all packages"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint contains: Every Debian Developer: * is member of the Debian project; * is allowed to vote about issues regarding the whole project; * can log in on most systems that keep Debian running; * has upload perm

Bug#699873: closing 699873

On 2013-02-06 04:38, Christoph Berg wrote: close 699873 thanks Hi Christoph, could you please explain how this was solved? The problem persists as of today. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#699873: [www.debian.org] Debian New Members Corner: glossary defines "New Member" as non-member

Package: www.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-newma...@lists.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@debian.org Severity: normal According to the glossary at the end of http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint.en.html a "New Member" is A person requesting Debian membership as Debian Developer. In other

Bug#696114: Re: Bug#696114: [www.debian.org] La distribution de test de Debian (French): "la excuses de la mise à jour"

un pluriel.. En effet... Merci On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:56:02PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/devel/testing.fr.html contains: Le script de mise à jour indique quand un paquet

Bug#678348: Reopen

reopen 678348 thanks Hi David, On 2012-12-12 16:36, David Prévot wrote: Le 20/06/2012 20:37, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/index.en.html contains: You are encouraged to switch your sources.list entries from testing to squeeze for the time being if you

Bug#696114: [www.debian.org] La distribution de test de Debian (French): "la excuses de la mise à jour"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/devel/testing.fr.html contains: Le script de mise à jour indique quand un paquet peut-être déplacé de la distribution instable vers la distribution de test. La sortie a deux formes

Bug#684883: [www.debian.org] French Ports page claims Debian is

reopen 684883 thanks On 2012-11-27 04:42, Francesca Ciceri wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:28:31PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: In any case, please do not close report of bugs until they are solved. This is not a bug, this is a divergence of opinions about the translation of a specific

Bug#684883: [www.debian.org] French Ports page claims Debian is

reopen 684883 thanks Hi Francesca, On 2012-11-25 08:49, Francesca Ciceri wrote: Closing this one, as is a mere translation problem and should be discussed on the mailing list of the French translation team (debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org). Cheers, Francesca feel free to discuss with th

Bug#689756: Logos page refers to "The Debian logo"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/logos/index.en.html contains: Debian has decided to create two logos: one logo is for official Debian use; the other logo

Bug#684883: [www.debian.org] French Ports page claims Debian is ported to all Linux architectures

Hi Christian, On 2012-08-16 00:23, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com): The Linux kernel has now been ported to a large, and growing, list of architectures. Following close behind, we have ported the Debian distribution to these architectures. The French

Bug#684883: [www.debian.org] French Ports page claims Debian is ported to all Linux architectures

Hi Christian, On 2012-08-15 02:21, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Filipus Klutiero (chea...@gmail.com): Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/ports/index.en.html contains: The Linux kernel has now been ported to a

Bug#684883: [www.debian.org] French Ports page claims Debian is ported to all Linux architectures

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/ports/index.en.html contains: The Linux kernel has now been ported to a large, and growing, list of architectures. Following close behind, we have ported the Debian distribution to

Re: debian wiki BoF at DebConf

Steve McIntyre wrote: Hi folks, Here's a summary of what we discussed in the debian wiki BoF [1] last week (13th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've also attached the Gobby notes that were take

Bug#682317: [www.debian.org] Technical committee: wrong date on node resolution

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte.en.html#status contains: * 2012-06-12 Bug #614907 : nodejs must use /usr/bin/nodejs, node must change to ax25-node and provide /usr/sbin/ax25-node, and transition packages and

Bug#681845: Translation of 'challenged' improved in the tech-ctte.wml page

Bonjour Cédric, On 2012-07-20 08:35, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi! The French translation of the page for the Technical Committee is being updated. While still in the review process, a newer version has just been uploaded addressing your concern: the sentence Lors de la discussion technique

Bug#681845: [www.debian.org] Incorrect French translation of warning on the technical committee ("vous devez ?tre pr?t ? ?tre d?fi?")

Hi Andrei, On 2012-07-17 03:02, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 17 iul 12, 00:32:27, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte.fr.html#referquestions contains in the first item of section "Quelques avertissements sur le comité&quo

Bug#681845: [www.debian.org] Incorrect French translation of warning on the technical committee ("vous devez ?tre pr?t ? ?tre d?fi?")

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte.fr.html#referquestions contains in the first item of section "Quelques avertissements sur le comité" : Lors de la discussion technique avec d'autres développeurs, vous devez être prêt à être défié et contredit. where

Bug#681736: [www.debian.org] "c'est possibles" in French constitution section 5.3

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.fr.html#item-5 contains in section 5.3: Lorsque c'est possibles le responsable du projet devrait solliciter de manière informelle les opinions des développeurs. "possibles" should have no final "s" since "ce"

Bug#678348: [www.debian.org] Debian “wheezy” Release Information: Outdated advice for pre-squeeze testing users

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/index.en.html contains: Please note that security updates for "testing" distribution are *not* yet managed by the security team. Hence, "testing" does *not* get security updates in a timely manner. You are encourag

Bug#669011: [LCFC] wml://{intro/diversity,News/2012/20120420}.wml [Let's release an announcement tomorrow?]

On 2012-06-04 20:52, David Prévot wrote: Hi press team, publicity and l10n-english CC, We already prepared and reviewed over a month ago an announcement about the diversity statement, I just refreshed it with a new date, and a mention and link to the vote. Unless someone vetoes or is willing to

Bug#671889: [www.debian.org] La distribution de test de Debian (French): "mise ? jour des excuses" for "update excuses"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org http://www.debian.org/devel/testing.fr.html contains: Le script de mise à jour indique quand un paquet peut-être déplacé de la distribution instable vers la distribution de test. La sortie a deux formes :

Bug#669011: Candidate version, questions

Thank you Stefano. The second diversity.wml attached (the one in David's mail) is candidate. Here are some questions/remarks on it. #use wml::debian::template title="Diversity Statement" BARETITLE="true" The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone. It doesn't matte

Bug#669011: xth wrap-up about statement on diversity, statement may be issued without general resolution (Re: Diversity statement for the Debian Project)

The message from Stefano Zacchiroli quoted below includes a wrap-up (of the wrap-up (of the...)) about the statement on diversity in contributors proposed by Francesca Ciceri. Stefano asked to publish it in #669011, although the statement is not approved. Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Fri, Mar

Bug#660950: Re: Bug#660950: [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry

Hi David, On 2012-04-04 18:03, David Prévot wrote: Le 23/02/2012 16:37, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : On 2012-02-22 22:15, David Prévot wrote: Le 22/02/2012 22:39, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : The Awards page entry of April 2006 about Linux+ links to http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr which yields

Bug#660710: [www.debian.org] DebianUsers link to parked domain ("Miscellaneous GNU/Linux links")

Hi David, On 2012-04-04 10:57, David Prévot wrote: Le 20/02/2012 23:45, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : The DebianUsers link on http://www.debian.org/misc/related_links#misclinux (Miscellaneous GNU/Linux links section of the Related Links page) points to a parked domain Removed. Thank you

Bug#655639: [www.debian.org] Awards: Linux New Media Awards entry does not link to Linux New Media announcement

On 2012-03-09 12:48, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Filipus Klutiero [2012-02-23 22:00:03 CET]: On 2012-02-22 22:29, David Prévot wrote: The possible inavailability of a page about the awards in the corporate Linux New Media website does not make this less of an issue. Definitely not an issue we

Bug#655639: [www.debian.org] Awards: Linux New Media Awards entry does not link to Linux New Media announcement

On 2012-02-22 22:29, David Prévot wrote: tags 655639 wontfix thanks Hi, Le 22/02/2012 22:31, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : reopen 655639 Pf… The possible inavailability of a page about the awards in the corporate Linux New Media website does not make this less of an issue. Definitely not

Bug#660950: [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry

Hi David, On 2012-02-22 22:15, David Prévot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 user www.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 660950 content misc severity 660950 minor thanks Hi Filipus, Le 22/02/2012 22:39, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : The Awards page entry of April

Bug#660950: [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The Awards page entry of April 2006 about Linux+ links to http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr which yields a 404 error. I don't know what Linux+ is, but being recommended by it is probably not that glorious, I'd recommend just removing the entry. Calling a rec

Bug#655639: [www.debian.org] Awards: Linux New Media Awards entry does not link to Linux New Media announcement

reopen 655639 thanks On 2012-01-12 20:42, David Prévot wrote: [ debian-publicity folks CC since the award page [0] is mostly their playground ] 0: http://www.debian.org/misc/awards Hi, Le 12/01/2012 20:17, Victor Nitu a écrit : On 01/12/2012 11:44 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: I

Bug#660784: [www.debian.org] "Setting up a Debian archive mirror": ftp.debian.org is no (longer) in the United States

Hi Simon, On 2012-02-21 15:46, Simon Paillard wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:26:04PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: According to the "Where to mirror from" section of "Setting up a Debian archive mirror", |ftp.debian.org| is merely one of several servers that g

Bug#660784: [www.debian.org] "Setting up a Debian archive mirror": ftp.debian.org is no (longer) in the United States

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal According to the "Where to mirror from" section of "Setting up a Debian archive mirror", |ftp.debian.org| is merely one of several servers that get updated from an internal Debian server. That address is presently located on a single server in the Uni

Bug#660710: [www.debian.org] DebianUsers link to parked domain ("Miscellaneous GNU/Linux links")

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The DebianUsers link on http://www.debian.org/misc/related_links#misclinux (Miscellaneous GNU/Linux links section of the Related Links page) points to a parked domain: http://www.debianusers.org/ By the way, other links from that section could also us

Bug#660129: [www.debian.org] Support - On-line Real Time Help Using IRC: broken link to KSirc (outdated list of clients)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/support#irc contains: To connect, you need an IRC client. Some of the most popular clients are XChat, ircII, irssi, epic4 and KSirc, all of which have been packaged for Debian. This is a little outdated. KSirc was removed with K

Bug#660127: [www.debian.org] Support - On-line Real Time Help Using IRC: points to empty #LinPeople (after move from freenode to OFTC)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/support#irc contains: At this point you will find yourself among the friendly crowd of |#debian| inhabitants. You're welcome to ask questions about Debian there. You can find the channel's faq at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianIRC.

Bug#657557: Cause

This was caused by the transition to description-less Packages indices (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/02/msg00149.html ). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Bug#655659: [debian-timeline] Please mention new squeeze look for Debian's websites

Package: debian-timeline Version: 17 Severity: wishlist At the same time Debian 6 was released, most of our websites changed their look: http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110205b Even though this is mostly an aesthetic change, I think after 13 years of the old design, this redesign was welcomed

Bug#655639: [www.debian.org] Awards: Linux New Media Awards entry does not link to Linux New Media announcement

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist http://www.debian.org/misc/awards.en.html mentions that Debian won "Best Open Source Server Distribution" and "Outstanding Contribution to Open Source/Linux/Free Software" at the Linux New Media Awards 2011.

Bug#638382: [www.debian.org] intro/organization: new System Administration members missing

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Peter Palfrader said on http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/08/18/people-behind-debian-peter-palfrader-debian-system-administrator/ : Since this year’s debconf we are six people in the admin team: Tollef Fog Heen (Mithrandir) and Faidon Liambotis (paravoid)

Bug#539758: Also experienced

Searches are case-sensitive! For example, "title:WindowsMedia" finds the page it's supposed to, but "title:windowsmedia" does not. Also, another example of a problematic page is NvidiaGraphicsDrivers. Although an attachment to it, nvidia-versions.sh, is found (for example searching "nvidia"),

Bug#629487: [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: Wrong/outdated contents filelist (sid+wheezy i386, ntfs-3g)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The files list for ntfs-3g at http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/ntfs-3g/filelist is outdated by 10 days, or at least wrong. ntfsprogs and ntfs-3g were merged so ntfs-3g now includes binaries from ntfsprogs such as ntfsfix, which is not reflected in t

Bug#611830: [www.debian.org] please update /ports/ WRT to amd64 ("EM64T") and ppc64

On 2011-02-04 21:45, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:36:43PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: ... I think we also need to update name to "32-bit PC (i386)" and "64-bit PC (amd64)" in line with new release notes. http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/

Bug#611830: [www.debian.org] please update /ports/ WRT to amd64 ("EM64T") and ppc64

On 2011-02-04 13:53, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 02/04/2011 01:36 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: I actually filed this report when reviewing the release notes. I found these "PC" descriptions vague/ambiguous. For example, a 32-bit PowerPC is not i386. I think we should stick to x86

Bug#611830: [www.debian.org] please update /ports/ WRT to amd64 ("EM64T") and ppc64

On 2011-02-04 11:09, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:59:00AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor The list of architectures on http://www.debian.org/ports/index.en.html could use an update. I'm noticing the following issues: amd64 is l

Bug#611830: [www.debian.org] please update /ports/ WRT to amd64 ("EM64T") and ppc64

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor The list of architectures on http://www.debian.org/ports/index.en.html could use an update. I'm noticing the following issues: amd64 is listed as AMD64 and EM64T, but not under its most widely known name, x86-64. EM64T was renamed to Intel 64. Note that

Bug#457995: closing 457995

On 2010-12-28 20:05, madame...@yahoo.it wrote: close 457995 thanks The quoted text clearly refers to packages name: apt is the correct name, as aptitude. No, aptitude is both the name of an APT front-end and of a package, and the sentence specifies it's talking about the aptitude *package tool*

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager (bis)

On 2010-07-29 04:54, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 12190 March 1977, Filipus Klutiero wrote: the wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager could use some work, Why does a wiki page of a long-over event need to be edited? There does not seem to be a point

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager (bis)

hed, everything after that is either "reverting to last good state" or "wrongfully reverting the good revert". Ok, so where is the first bad edit? You have different opinions on this: On 29 July 2010 06:14, Filipus Klutiero wrote: On 2010-07-28 19:04, Frank Lin PIAT w

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager (bis)

On 2010-07-29 02:47, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! * Filipus Klutiero [2010-07-29 00:04:59 CEST]: On 2010-07-28 09:10, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Filipus Klutiero [2010-07-28 07:31:41 CEST]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2010/05/msg00044.html Reading

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager (bis)

On 2010-07-28 19:04, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: Filipus Klutiero wrote: On 2010-07-28 09:10, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Filipus Klutiero [2010-07-28 07:31:41 CEST]: the wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager could use some work, but I can&#

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager (bis)

Hi Gerfried, On 2010-07-28 09:10, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! As you bring the debian-www list into the game, I am commenting on it. * Filipus Klutiero [2010-07-28 07:31:41 CEST]: the wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager could use some work

wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager (bis)

Hi, the wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager could use some work, but I can't easily edit it due to an edit restriction on my account for this page set by Steve McIntyre in revision 18. The restriction is commented by "Put the page back to where it has been

Re: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager

On 2010-05-09 08:51, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:33:08AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi Steve, you reverted my latest revision to SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager with the comment "Put the page back to where it has been for a year. Philippe: why ar

Bug#532810: [www.debian.org] /ports/m68k/ says that m68k is supported

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/ports/m68k/ contains "Debian currently runs on the 68020, 68030, 68040 and 68060 processors.". The page which usually brings there (http://www.debian.org/ports/) does mention that "The port failed to make the release criteria for De

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager

Le April 5, 2009 06:19:39 pm, vous avez écrit : > Hello Chealer, > > On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 17:39 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Le April 5, 2009 02:47:07 am, vous avez écrit : > > > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 18:02 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > > Le Apri

[Fwd: Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager]

I sent my last mail to Franklin only. I resent it to the list and am forwarding Franklin's reply. --- Begin Message --- Hello Chealer, On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 17:39 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Le April 5, 2009 02:47:07 am, vous avez écrit : > > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 18:02

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager

Le April 5, 2009 02:47:07 am, vous avez écrit : > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 18:02 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Le April 3, 2009 03:10:17 am Frank Lin PIAT, vous avez écrit : > > > There is a kind of implicit rule on this wiki... > > > wiki pages are like packages,

Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager

Le April 3, 2009 03:10:17 am Frank Lin PIAT, vous avez écrit : > There is a kind of implicit rule on this wiki... > wiki pages are like packages, they are maintained by some Teams/People. > (DebianInstaller/* are managed by DI team, WiFi/* pages are managed by > Geoff Simons and a few others, Debia

Re: Re: wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager

Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2009-04-03, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi debian-www. Please notice that Filipus Klutiero has a past of being banned from writing to debian-release and being banned from the cont...@bugs.debian.org bot. I don't see how this is relevant, unless you imply that this

wiki.d.o: SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager

Hi, the wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2009/KDE-based-packagemanager could use some work, but I can't easily edit it to due an edit restriction on my account for this page set by Paul Wise in revisions 13, 14 and 15. The restriction is commented by "No edit wars, thanks", which does

Agree (Re: DebianWiki: "Discussion sub-pages" (aka Supplementation pages))

Frank Lin PIAT wrote: Moinmoin has built-in support for Discussion pages (the feature is named Supplementation Page, see [1]) What about enabling it. If that was a question, I agree. (and if that was a request, I support it :) ) Note that I never used this Moin feature, so I wouldn't know of

Bug#516869: [www.debian.org] /ports/sparc/ says that sun4m is supported

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal According to http://debian.org/ports/sparc/index.en.html > Supported are Sun4m and Sun4u machines (with a 32-bit userland). But according to http://debian.org/releases/stable/sparc/ch02s01.html.en#sparc-cpus > sun4, sun4c, sun4d, sun4m > > None of th

Bug#515562: [www.debian.org] "ix86" in /ports/i386/index.fr.html

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n In /ports/i386/index.fr.html, x86 is translated to ix86, which is neither x86 nor i386. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#515218: [www.debian.org] Wrong encoding for 4.0r7 French release announcement

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n The French announcement of 4.0r7's release has wrong encoding, as can be seen from the home page and the announcement page: http://debian.org/index.fr.html http://debian.org/News/2009/20090210.fr.html At least the title is encoded in UTF-8. Th

Bug#503894: [www.debian.org] intro/organization French translation error for "Debian Maintainer Keyring Team"

Le October 30, 2008 06:56:02 pm Simon Paillard, vous avez écrit : > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:21:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Severity: minor > > Tags: l10n > > > > In http://www.debian.org/intro/organization.fr.html the stri

Bug#503894: [www.debian.org] intro/organization French translation error for "Debian Maintainer Keyring Team"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n In http://www.debian.org/intro/organization.fr.html the string "Debian Maintainer Keyring Team" from http://www.debian.org/intro/organization.en.html is translated to "Équipe des responsables des clés Debian", which means "Debian keys maintaine

Bug#496507: [www.debian.org] Debian Description Translation Project (DDTP) Translation-lang files not only available for sid

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor According to http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/ddtp This version of APT downloads Translation-lang files from Debian mirrors. These are only available for sid at the moment and may be missing on some mirrors. The location of these files on mirrors

Bug#476337: [www.debian.org] broken link to "Oldstable distribution information" in oldstable security updates announcements

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor oldstable security updates anouncements, such as http://www.us.debian.org/News/2008/20080413, contain a broken link to http://www.us.debian.org/releases/oldstable/ labelled "Oldstable distribution information (release notes, errata, etc.):" This should be

Bug#468765: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#468765: Should the Debian project state it is proud of oldstable security support?)

Le March 20, 2008 05:07:52 am Raphael Hertzog, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Hi Holger, > > did you intend to close #468765? If yes, please clarify what you meant. > > If not, please reopen. > > Stop bothering us wit

Bug#468765: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#468765: Should the Debian project state it is proud of oldstable security support?)

Le March 3, 2008 05:48:14 am Debian Bug Tracking System, vous avez écrit : > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the www.debian.org package: > > #468765: security support termination announcements are "too proud" > > It has been closed by Holger Lev

Bug#468765: confusing sentence about pride in security support termination announcements

Package: debian-www Severity: minor This report is about the same sentence as the one discussed in #468765. I'm starting a new report because #468765 was closed (apparently by error) and to show the summary below prominently (the first report got long). I also propose an alternative solution.

Re: Bug#468765: # of supported packages (was Re: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?)

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > This sentence specifically talks about the duration of security > support. Obviously there are other aspects of security support, but > the sentence doesn't talk about that, and it's not clear that > Debian's securi

Bug#468765: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?

Le March 10, 2008 07:49:22 pm Joerg Jaspert, vous avez écrit : [...] > > If it really annoys you so much that its no longer supported after March > 31st - noone stops you from doing the work and providing security > support for sarge in an archive you set up for it. If there's anything I wrote that

Re: Re: Bug#468765: security support termination announcements are"too proud"

On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:01:16AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Le March 1, 2008 04:03:28 am Frank Lichtenheld, vous avez écrit : > > Either way, I don't think that debian-www is the right place to discuss > > this. I would suggest debian-project or debian-publicity. &g

Bug#468765: # of supported packages (was Re: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?)

Le March 10, 2008 04:43:30 pm, vous avez écrit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 04:13:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Le March 10, 2008 02:56:15 pm Luk Claes, vous avez ?crit?: > > > Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I reported #468765 about

Bug#468765: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?

Le March 10, 2008 04:24:22 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian is somewhat better than openSUSE, equal or slightly worst than > > Ubuntu and definitely worst than RHEL and deriv

  1   2   >