Self-actualization (was: Re: DW)

2005-08-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 13/08/2005, at 9:36 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: I believe it's also a staple of the Open Source community that participants must be largely self-actualizing, and that this is a necessary and desirable element of the culture, so I find it hard to usefully respond to comments of "I'm here, how

Planning (was: Re: DW (was: Re: [gnome-women] Getting a Web Site Up & Logo Contest status)

2005-08-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 13/08/2005, at 8:48 AM, Erinn Clark wrote: I mean, is this an issue of empowerment (or lack thereof)? I have no idea how to empower someone who's afraid to take the first step except to tell them not to be afraid. I don't even know how many people are listening. Encouraging people is usefu

Focus people (was: Re: DW (was: Re: [gnome-women] Getting a Web Site Up & Logo Contest status)

2005-08-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
नमस्ते स्वक्ष !! :) (Hello svashka), good to see you posting here again. Thankyou very much for your appreciation. :) You've made some very useful points. It really helps to have different points of view, different ways of saying things. Thankyou. :) On 12/08/2005, at 10:49 PM, || स्वक्ष

Re: DW

2005-08-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:43:21PM +0600, || स्वक्ष || svaksha wrote: > On 8/11/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, hmm, you may be right that this is a strategy that debian-women needs to > > adopt in order to scale up much beyond its current size; for my part, > > though, that

Re: DW (was: Re: [gnome-women] Getting a Web Site Up & Logo Contest status)

2005-08-12 Thread Erinn Clark
* || स्वक्ष || svaksha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:08:12 19:19 +0600]: > On 8/11/05, Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So I'm wondering: how do we encourage people who have not expressed an > > opinion? Is it really safe to cater to people we don't know rather than > > For starters,

Re: Another "Women in Open Source" Session

2005-08-12 Thread Bernhard Krieger
Thanks, Hannah, for adding FLOSS Asia and FLOSS US to it. I forgot. B. Hanna M. Wallach schrieb: As I understand it, the number is borne out in several studies. The number comes from the 2002, 2003 and 2004 FLOSS surveys, which took place in Maastricht [1]_, the US [2]_ and Asia [3]_, re

Re: Another "Women in Open Source" Session

2005-08-12 Thread Bernhard Krieger
Hey, Here are links the largest surveys on free software developers in 2001/2002: a) Widi survey carried out by the Technical University of Berlin in 2001 with 1.1 % women online on http://widi.berlios.de/paper/study.html b) FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) developers´ survey undertake

Re: Another "Women in Open Source" Session

2005-08-12 Thread Hanna M. Wallach
> As I understand it, the number is borne out in several studies. The number comes from the 2002, 2003 and 2004 FLOSS surveys, which took place in Maastricht [1]_, the US [2]_ and Asia [3]_, respectively. The numbers are: 2002 Maastricht: 1.1% women (~2800 participants) 2003 US: 1.6% women (1493

Re: Another "Women in Open Source" Session

2005-08-12 Thread Jutta Wrage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.08.2005 um 13:56 schrieb Gustavo Noronha Silva: and witnessed some negative reaction to this study on the local linuxchix group. Did they think, the number was wrong? Or what was the negative reaction about? greetings Jutta - -- htt

Re: Another "Women in Open Source" Session

2005-08-12 Thread Danese Cooper
I'm copying Bernhard Kreiger to comment on the research that backs up this number. As I understand it, the number is borne out in several studies. Danese On Aug 12, 2005, at 4:56 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Em Seg, 2005-08-08 às 16:00 -0400, Christine Spang escreveu: Neat! Looks lik

Re: DW (was: Re: [gnome-women] Getting a Web Site Up & Logo Contest status)

2005-08-12 Thread || स्वक्ष || svaksha
Hello All ! I have been following this and other threads for some time and at the outset, kudos to Clytie for taking the time and energy to explain what she believes in. On 8/11/05, Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I'm wondering: how do we encourage people who have not expressed an

Re: DW

2005-08-12 Thread || स्वक्ष || svaksha
On 8/11/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, hmm, you may be right that this is a strategy that debian-women needs to > adopt in order to scale up much beyond its current size; for my part, > though, that seems to demand a greater mental commitment than I'm able to > give for trackin

Re: Another "Women in Open Source" Session

2005-08-12 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Seg, 2005-08-08 às 16:00 -0400, Christine Spang escreveu: > Neat! Looks like an article about the session made it into Newsforge[1], > with both you and DW mentioned. Do we have a press/articles section on > the site/wiki? Should we? > > Keep us in the loop about the Women in Open Source thing.

Re: [OT] Living dangerously

2005-08-12 Thread Herman Robak
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:17:49 +0200, Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/08/2005, at 2:36 AM, Erinn Clark wrote: I think Herman likes to prod things and see if they explode. ;) It's fun, but you need to stand back and have good life insurance. Haven't you ever had that urge to

Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Herman Robak
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:33:45 +0200, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You are better off living with it. Influencing the media to the point where you have reasonable control is a lot of work! Spending more effort on self-publishing is probably better. Reading Javier's excellent pos

[OT] Re: Living dangerously (was: Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Javier Candeira
On 8/12/05, Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Herman likes to prod things and see if they explode. ;) It's > fun, but you need to stand back and have good life insurance. > > Haven't you ever had that urge to stand up and shout "Fire!" in a > crowded, dark film theatre? Or to pu

Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Herman Robak
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:50:30 +0200, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:13:59 +0200, Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Geeks Want Women" Pleeease. :( The last thing we want is anyone thinking we're running a lonely hearts club. It's a headline. A

Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Javier Candeira
On 8/12/05, Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we write to them, do you think? I don't have much experience > with the media, but there's a member on the Volunteers Linuxchix list > who has a lot. Does it work to write in on occasions like this? Write to them respectfully, addressi

Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Herman Robak
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:13:59 +0200, Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Geeks Want Women" Pleeease. :( The last thing we want is anyone thinking we're running a lonely hearts club. It's a headline. At least it's truthful. The media do more harm than good these days. Live with

Living dangerously (was: Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 12/08/2005, at 2:36 AM, Erinn Clark wrote: Although I find the title "Geeks Want Women" rather off-putting." Do you prefer gay geeks? *ducking* What is wrong with you? I think Herman likes to prod things and see if they explode. ;) It's fun, but you need to stand back and have go

Re: Another story about OSCON Women in Open Source panel

2005-08-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 12/08/2005, at 2:02 AM, Danese Cooper wrote: "And here's one from TechWorld: http://www.techworld.com/applications/news/index.cfm?NewsID=4182 Although I find the title "Geeks Want Women" rather off-putting." Yuk :( Should we write to them, do you think? I don't have much experience wi

Welcome to DW (was: Re: DW (was: Re: [gnome-women] Getting a Web Site Up & Logo Contest status)

2005-08-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
I'll try to answer this. I do find long posts difficult to understand, so please allow for confusion. On 12/08/2005, at 12:10 AM, Erinn Clark wrote: Well, one thing you fail to recognize is that there is a difficult balance to maintain. No, I do realize that. That's why I joined in the dis