quirements?
[CRA] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0130_EN.html
Thanks for running for DPL to both of you!
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
This is mostly Sruthi Chandran's proposed amendment, with minor tweaks
and without asking for resignation. I am proposing this because I don't
want Debian tells other organisations what to do (small difference that
for me is important).
Choice X: Debian is unable to collaborate with FSF
===
El 29/03/21 a las 14:51, Santiago R.R. escribió:
> Hi,
>
> This is mostly Sruthi Chandran's proposed amendment, with minor tweaks
> and without asking for resignation. I am proposing this because I don't
> want Debian tells other organisations what to do (small di
th with the FSF and any other organisation in which
> >>> Richard
> >>> Stallman has a leading position.
> >> Hi Santiago,
> >>
> >> I know this is more of a question about the original FSFE statement with
> >> this phrasing, but sinc
El 31/03/21 a las 20:14, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz escribió:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 19:53 Enrico Zini wrote:
> > Hello Debian Members,
> >
> > For some time, we have been having systemic issues that make GR
> > discussions painful. GRs themselves shouldn't be painful, and don't need
> > to be. Havin
Draft. Comments welcome. Please Cc the list, not me.
Those who have in Debian the power to do so, will implement the following:
To avoid spammers harvesting addresses from the list archives:
- The public web archives o
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Those who have in Debian the power to do so, will implement the following:
>
> The rest of your email is ignorable, because the above is blatantly wrong.
>
> You can't force anyone to d
Enough comments.
I withdraw my proposal (better said: I won't make it official).
Thanks everybody.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The answer is not to treat legitimate users like dirt, and
> force them to use the subscribe address (my subscribe address is
> never the address I post from).
No, you could subscribe the address you post from to the "white list".
Smartlist t
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Santiago> Unless you change ISP several times a week, this would not be a
> Santiago> problem for you, Manoj.
>
> I change ISP's several times a month, and, indeed, sometimes
> use more than 2 a week.
Well, but
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Santiago> My points is that posting to a mailing list should be a
> Santiago> privilege, not a "right".
>
> I strongly disagree. We are vendors who provide an OS. I know
> we do not treat users as customers, but being a debian
Susan Kleinmann wrote:
> I have found a few sentences in the debian constitution·
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
>
> which seem incomplete or just wrong to me, so I wonder what's the
> name of the "package" to which I should submit the bug report.
>
> Please respond to me as well as t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> The next release of Debian will not be accompanied by a non-free
> section; there will be no more stable releases of the non-free
> section. The Debian project will cease active support of the non-free
> s
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:57:09PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > mocka BSD-style license with noxious advertising clause. why is
> > this
> > in non-free?
>
> This does look like a mistaken categorization to me; to my eye,
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> sacrifice I'm willing to make.
It's funny that someone who wants to be the Project Leader uses the
word "sacrifice" here.
--
To
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > > down on my occasional email flame of a
Draft. Comments welcome. Please Cc the list, not me.
Those who have in Debian the power to do so, will implement the following:
To avoid spammers harvesting addresses from the list archives:
- The public web archives
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Those who have in Debian the power to do so, will implement the following:
>
> The rest of your email is ignorable, because the above is blatantly wrong.
>
> You can't force any
Enough comments.
I withdraw my proposal (better said: I won't make it official).
Thanks everybody.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The answer is not to treat legitimate users like dirt, and
> force them to use the subscribe address (my subscribe address is
> never the address I post from).
No, you could subscribe the address you post from to the "white list".
Smartlist t
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Santiago> Unless you change ISP several times a week, this would not be a
> Santiago> problem for you, Manoj.
>
> I change ISP's several times a month, and, indeed, sometimes
> use more than 2 a week.
Well, but
Susan Kleinmann wrote:
> I have found a few sentences in the debian constitution·
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
>
> which seem incomplete or just wrong to me, so I wonder what's the
> name of the "package" to which I should submit the bug report.
>
> Please respond to me as well as t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> The next release of Debian will not be accompanied by a non-free
> section; there will be no more stable releases of the non-free
> section. The Debian project will cease active support of the non-free
> s
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:57:09PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > mocka BSD-style license with noxious advertising clause. why is this
> > in non-free?
>
> This does look like a mistaken categorization to me; to my eye, the
Greetings,
This is an email to notify you that you have been accepted into our
"Lowest_Mortgage_Rate" program.
Please visit the following link to complete your application which has been
pre-approved.
http://loanpoly.com/?partid=wh6
Thank You
Tamera
Senior Mortgage Consultant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 7 Jun 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> Debian General Resolution
>
> Resolved:
>
> A. That the Debian Social Contract with the Free Software Community be
> amended as follows:
>
> 1. That text of Section 5 be modified to read: "We acknowledge that
> some of
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> >
> > These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> > relationship with other free software entities, and nont
> The problem is:
>
> (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
> legally (according to the constitution) be modified
> (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> should require a supermajority
> (c) A group of de
I wrote:
> * Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
> way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
> to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".
Ooops! I have just been pointed out that this is not true, because of
constit
> unzip should be in main now - it's now got a free license.
Clarification: unzip is in non-US/main in woody, for those who didn't find it.
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer. That's a
> sacrifice I'm willing to make.
It's funny that someone who wants to be the Project Leader uses the
word "sacrifice" here.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Nevertheless, if elected DPL, I realize that I turn the temperature
> > > down on my occasional email flame of a fellow developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 7 Jun 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> Debian General Resolution
>
> Resolved:
>
> A. That the Debian Social Contract with the Free Software Community be
> amended as follows:
>
> 1. That text of Section 5 be modified to read: "We acknowledge that
> some o
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> >
> > These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> > relationship with other free software entities, and non
> The problem is:
>
> (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
> legally (according to the constitution) be modified
> (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract
> should require a supermajority
> (c) A group of d
I wrote:
> * Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional
> way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need
> to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".
Ooops! I have just been pointed out that this is not true, because of
consti
> unzip should be in main now - it's now got a free license.
Clarification: unzip is in non-US/main in woody, for those who didn't find it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El 26/03/21 a las 13:26, Dominik George escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:31AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > [replying only to -vote - please avoid cross-posting!]
>
> OK, but you actually replied only to -devel instead of -vote.
>
> >
> > Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26
El 04/03/22 a las 12:03, Mattia Rizzolo escribió:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:42:51AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Reaffirm public voting
> > ==
> >
> > Since we can either have secret and intransparent voting, or we can have
> > open and transparent voting, the project res
system and mailing lists).
>
> Thereby re-inforcing the interpretation that any installer or image with
> non-free software on it is not part of the Debian system, but that we
> support their use and welcome others to distribute such work.
>
> ==
I won't vote for this, but I think it is important to have this option
on the ballot.
Seconded,
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-resilience-act-new-cybersecurity-rules-for-digital-products-and-ancillary-services/F3376542_en
(3) Debian Social Contract No. 2, 3 and 4
https://www.debian.org/social_contract
- GENERAL RESOLUTION ENDS -
Cheers,
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
El 15/11/23 a las 00:49, Luca Boccassi escribió:
> On Sun, 2023-11-12 at 12:10 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > Dear Debian Fellows,
> >
> > Following the email sent by Ilu to debian-project (Message-ID:
> > <4b93ed08-f148-4c7f-b172-f967f7de7...@gmx.net&g
t; > Second version, taking into account feedback. Looking for seconds at
> > this point:
>
> Maybe Santiago wants to adopt this text, rather than having 2 options?
The initial proposal was made collectively, and now I realise I should
have signed with a "On behalf of the Debian fe
Thanks to those who have spotted errors and have proposed fixes!
I am collecting more patches, and I will send an updated proposal as
soon as possible. But I won't be able to do it earlier than tomorrow
Wednesday, when I will be in the Northern hemisphere.
El 21/11/23 a las 12:01, Miriam Ruiz esc
tion/have-your-say/initiatives/13410-Cyber-resilience-act-new-cybersecurity-rules-for-digital-products-and-ancillary-services/F3376542_en
+Detailed analysis:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13410-Cyber-resilience-act-new-cybersecurity-rules-for-digital-products-and-ancillary-services/F3376542_en
(3) Debian Social Contract No. 2, 3 and 4
https://www.debian.org/social_contract
Cheers,
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
/F3376542_en
-
-(3) Debian Social Contract No. 2, 3 and 4
+(2) Debian Social Contract No. 2, 3 and 4
https://www.debian.org/social_contract
Thank you all,
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
El 02/12/23 a las 01:07, Bill Allombert escribió:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:36:29PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Bill Allombert dijo [Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:07:29PM +0100]:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:25:17AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > > This is also something we discussed before sen
and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS
> >
>
> This would be real-english-english? ;-) If it has the same meaning, fine
> by me. I've pinged Santiago.
I fully trust Russ's English skills :-)
LGTM.
Thank you!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s of the word Chairman shall be replaced with the word Chair.
>
> === END GR TEXT ===
Seconded.
Thanks!
Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Em 20 de março de 2025 09:41:58 GMT-03:00, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
escreveu:
>Hi
>
>Em 19/03/2025 20:05, Pierre-Elliott Bécue escreveu:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote on 19/03/2025 at
>> 20:46:12+0100:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Em 19/03/2025 08:15, Andreas Tille escrev
50 matches
Mail list logo
