I wrote: > * Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional > way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need > to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".
Ooops! I have just been pointed out that this is not true, because of constitution 7.1 point 3: "The Secretary adjudicates any disputes about interpretation of the constitution.". I think I would support a change in the constitution so that this is decided by a group of persons.
