> The problem is: > > (a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can > legally (according to the constitution) be modified > (b) A group of developers think modification of the social contract > should require a supermajority > (c) A group of developers think modification of the social contract > by simple majority is perfectly reasonable and legal under the > constitution
So, the real problem is: * Our constitution is incomplete because there is not a constitutional way to determine whether something is constitutional or not. We would need to amend it and create a "constitutional court of justice".
