On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 01:46:28AM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 9c605edd-40a5-469c-9489-cbf80ac05970
> [1] Choice 1: Andreas Tille
> [2] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
> [ ] Choice 3: None Of The Abov
Hi Luna,
Am 1. April 2023 16:24:51 MESZ schrieb Luna Jernberg :
>Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
I beg to disagree. There is still a point in voting with just one ballot option
available. By following the rules set by our constitution, we ensure we
continu
Luna Jernberg writes:
> Alright i did not know that, thanks for the info
Also, while I guess you could think of it as just a "congratulations" to
vote when there's a single candidate, I think of it more as a "vote of
confidence". By voting, and putting the candidate above none of the
above, I'm
Alright i did not know that, thanks for the info
On 4/1/23, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le samedi, 1 avril 2023, 16.24:51 h CEST Luna Jernberg a écrit :
>> Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
>> congrats to being the Debian Project Leader for another year
>
>
Le samedi, 1 avril 2023, 16.24:51 h CEST Luna Jernberg a écrit :
> Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
> congrats to being the Debian Project Leader for another year
With Q being about 16, and quorum being 3Q, at least 48 developers need to
vote highvoltage abov
Hey!
Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
congrats to being the Debian Project Leader for another year
On 4/1/23, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2023.
>
>
> Voting period s
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> f9533fc1-129b-41db-822c-be8fe8e9faa6
> [1] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
> [2] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
> [3] Choice 3: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
signat
Le dimanche 04 avril 2021 à 21:33:57+1000, Dmitry Smirnov a écrit :
> On Sunday, 4 April 2021 9:49:57 AM AEST Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
> > [ ] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
> > [ ] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
>
> FYI, both cancel mob candidates signed anti-RMS statement:
>
>
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 4 April 2021 9:49:57 AM AEST Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
>> [ ] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
>> [ ] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
>
> FYI, both cancel mob candidates signed anti-RMS statement:
>
>
> https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-ope
On 4 Apr 2021, at 12:33, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 4 April 2021 9:49:57 AM AEST Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
>> [ ] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
>> [ ] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
>
> FYI, both cancel mob candidates signed anti-RMS statement:
>
>
> https://github.com
On Sunday, 4 April 2021 9:49:57 AM AEST Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx
wrote:
> [ ] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
> [ ] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
FYI, both cancel mob candidates signed anti-RMS statement:
https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/main/index.md
--
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 05:01:39PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 04:06:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> > Roeckx wrote:
> > >...
> > > The details of the results are available at:
> > > https://vote
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 03:38:45PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
> > Stats for the DPL votes:
> > |--+--++---++-++---|
> > | | Num || Valid |
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 04:06:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
> Roeckx wrote:
> >...
> > The details of the results are available at:
> > https://vote.debian.org/2020/vote_001
> >...
>
> The constitution says:
>
> A.6.3.2
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> Stats for the DPL votes:
> |--+--++---++-++---|
> | | Num || Valid | Unique | Rejects | % | Multiple |
> | Year | DDs | Quorum | Votes
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
>...
> The details of the results are available at:
> https://vote.debian.org/2020/vote_001
>...
The constitution says:
A.6.3.2.
An option A defeats the default option D by a majority ratio N, if
V(A,D)
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:06:16AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
Hi Adriano,
there was a recent keyring update just in time so I could vote without problems
in the meantime. Perhaps this also solved your problem or did you not set an
expiry on your master key?
Cheers
TL;DR I'm happy my vote wa
* Adriano Rafael Gomes: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)" (Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:44:26 -0300):
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I have set up an expiry on
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
Hi all,
I have set up an expiry on my GPG key:
- originally set to 2019-04-07
- updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
including keyring.debian.org.
But nevertheless my ballot is rejected, because obv
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> If so then I think there is a clear gap in the procedures.
>
> - What about DDs being approved just during the voting period? They should
> clearly be able to vote.
For the avoidance of doubt and just for the record, we (DAMs) c
* Gunnar Wolf: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 21:58:43 -0500):
Hi Gunnar,
>
> FWIW, I already sent Mathias a private mail about this, as he also
> asked this privately :) But this seems to be of g
Hi,
FWIW, I already sent Mathias a private mail about this, as he also
asked this privately :) But this seems to be of general interest, so...
> (...)
> > *Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short before
> > they start,
> > so you may be out of luck.
>
> If so then I t
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:55:08PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:03:43 -0400):
>
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0
* Kurt Roeckx: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:10:04 +0200):
> In my expierence, they do update the keyring during the voting
> period because each year some people run into this problem. I
> s
* Roberto C. Sánchez: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:03:43 -0400):
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > * Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: R
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:10:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have set up an expiry on my GPG key:
> > - originally set to 2019-04-07
> > - updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
>
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)"):
> [explanations]
...
> [advice]
...
> [offer of help]
Thank you for this helpful and constructive response.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have set up an expiry on my GPG key:
> - originally set to 2019-04-07
> - updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
> including keyring.debian.org.
>
> But nevertheless my ballot is reject
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election
> 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:44:43 +0200):
>
> > On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
* Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:44:43 +0200):
> On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> >> *Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short befor
On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
*Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short before
they start, so you may be out of luck.
If so then I think there is a clear gap in the procedures.
That may be, though they are like this for a long time now.
- What about DDs
* Ian Jackson: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:13:32 +0100):
Hi Ian,
> Joerg Jaspert writes ("Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election 2019: First call for votes)"):
* Mattia Rizzolo: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:16:43 +0200):
Hi Mattia,
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> &
* Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 09 Apr 2019 12:12:10 +0200):
Hi Joerg,
thanks for your answer.
> On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > - originally set to 2019-04-07
> >
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > - originally set to 2019-04-07
> > - updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
> > including keyring.debian.org.
>
> That was a bit late, but the right pl
Joerg Jaspert writes ("Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)"):
> *Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short
> before they start, so you may be out of luck.
In that case I think the Secretary should make
On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
- originally set to 2019-04-07
- updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
including keyring.debian.org.
That was a bit late, but the right place to send to.
Do I have to wait for a keyring sync of the DD Keyring? When wi
.raw]
for the vote
"Debian Project Leader 2019 Election"
sent in on Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:38:59 +0200, with the subject
"Re: Debian Project Leader election 2019: First call for votes"
The message ID is <20190409093859.1fedb...@monsterix.mbehrle.de>.
The message base i
Enrico Zini (2015-05-24):
> I have also implemented audit tracking of all changes to Person records
> on nm.debian.org, which in turn allowed me to change the nightly
> maintenance scripts to do more aggressive imports of changes from
> keyrings and LDAP.
>
> I have also done quite a bit of manua
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:50:36PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> In nm.debian.org's nightly maintenance I run a lot of code that computes
> differences between these data sources, so we have the capability of
> tracking things, and the possibility of manually tweaking nm.debian.org
> to really fit t
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> the answer is 986 at present.
So can you give me a list of those 986 so I can update the
website?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > I get the numbers from nm.debian.org, both at https://nm.debian.org/api
> > and https://nm.debian.org/public/findperson/
> Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate; the list for Debian
> Developer, Uploading includes "ste
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > As far as I know relying on the keyring and ldap has always been
> > incorrect. The number was always off by a few.
>
> I've never quite understood why LDAP isn't accurate, but I couldn't
> figure out a simple query and even
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:09:01AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:28:34PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:45:37AM +0200]:
> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sadly this list is triv
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:28:34PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:45:37AM +0200]:
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > >
> > > Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate
> >
> > So I have no source at all that is can
Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:45:37AM +0200]:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> >
> > Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate
>
> So I have no source at all that is can tell me the number of DDs?
You can fetch the number of active DD keys [
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate
So I have no source at all that is can tell me the number of DDs?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:12:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:26:27AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary -
> > Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > > Stats for the DPL votes:
> > > |--+--++---
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:26:27AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary -
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > Stats for the DPL votes:
> > |--+--++---++-++---|
> > | | Num || Va
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:26:27AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary -
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > Stats for the DPL votes:
> > |--+--++---++-++---|
> > | | Num || Va
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary -
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Stats for the DPL votes:
> |--+--++---++-++---|
> | | Num || Valid | Unique | Rejects | % | Multiple |
> | Year | DDs | Quorum | Votes
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx dijo [Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 05:31:39PM
+0200]:
> Hi,
>
> The winner of the election is Stefano Zacchiroli.
>
> (...)
>
> Stats for the DPL votes:
> |--+--++---++-++---|
> | | Num || Valid | U
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:06:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> | 2010 | 886 | 44.648 | 459 |436 | 88 | 49.210 | 9.76513 |
>
> If I count right, there are 112 Debian Maintainers not able to be represented
> in the above.
>
> I wonder if conducting a parallel vote of the DMs, for inform
Joey Hess writes:
> | 2010 | 886 | 44.648 | 459 |436 | 88 | 49.210 | 9.76513 |
>
> If I count right, there are 112 Debian Maintainers not able to be represented
> in the above.
>
> I wonder if conducting a parallel vote of the DMs, for information only,
> would be worth doing next y
| 2010 | 886 | 44.648 | 459 |436 | 88 | 49.210 | 9.76513 |
If I count right, there are 112 Debian Maintainers not able to be represented
in the above.
I wonder if conducting a parallel vote of the DMs, for information only,
would be worth doing next year? It would be interesting to
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
>
> .oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
> maybe people can help with software maintenance more
Hi,
The current devotee package is far too wedded to the Debian way
of doing things to be useful as a package. It is far too inglexible,
and things have ben h a r d c o d e d.
I have a devotee-ng in a rewrite now, that is far more modular,
and, critically, composable -- so t
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:35:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Also, something on my wishlist (and the wishlist of others) for years,
> has been a "poll system", which could be used during heated discussions
> to get an idea of what the silent majority thinks.
> Unfortunately, apparently the sec
On 14/04/09 at 10:48 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
>
> .oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
> maybe people can help with software maintenance more easily ... )
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
.oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
maybe people can help with software maintenance more easily ... )
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ P
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:23:56PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Would it be possible to add a pointer to the frequently encountered
> problems to the devotee error reply? This would most likely reduce the
> burden on the secretary during the voting period and allow people to
> solve the problems a
Would it be possible to add a pointer to the frequently encountered
problems to the devotee error reply? This would most likely reduce the
burden on the secretary during the voting period and allow people to
solve the problems at their end faster.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguish
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> > I wish you contacted me about this before so that we could find a
> > solution to get your vote counted.
>
> Just a comment: if Luigi sent a valid vote during the correct time frame, and
> it was rejected because of a software bug, shouldn't it
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:46:54AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
>
> Il giorno 13/apr/09, alle ore 01:43, Kurt Roeckx ha scritto:
>> I wish you contacted me about this before so that we could find a
>> solution to get your vote counted.
>
> Thanks for your report. I did not contact you before, sinc
Hi Kurt,
Il giorno 13/apr/09, alle ore 01:43, Kurt Roeckx ha scritto:
I wish you contacted me about this before so that we could find a
solution to get your vote counted.
Thanks for your report. I did not contact you before, since I oversaw
the warning in the first vote report and dismissed
Luigi Gangitano writes:
> You're right. It was my fault not to check the correctness of my
> ballot, but since I've always used this combination of MUA to send my
> votes I have been easily distracted by the warning on unsafe directory
> permissions.
Devotee is actually a nice way to verify your
Il giorno 13/apr/09, alle ore 06:59, Manoj Srivastava ha scritto:
Frankly, if would seem that a DD ought o be able to deliver RFC
compliant mails to vote.d.o.
You're right. It was my fault not to check the correctness of my
ballot, but since I've always used this combination of MUA to
On Sun, Apr 12 2009, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> On Sunday 12 April 2009 17:43:36 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:01:38AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
>> > Hi Kurt,
>> > can you please report on issue in the voting software that prevented
>> > some ballots to be processed? I sent
On Sun, Apr 12 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
>> It seems that devotee does not properly handle it.
Devotee follows the standards. That means RFC 2440 or RFC
3156. If you can point me to an RFC the said vote followed, I'll
s
On Sunday 12 April 2009 17:43:36 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:01:38AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> > Hi Kurt,
> > can you please report on issue in the voting software that prevented
> > some ballots to be processed? I sent my vote twince on April 9 and April
> > 11 and got th
Le Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> It seems that devotee does not properly handle it.
Hi all,
at worse, there may be alternatives, like selectricity (.org), which was also
made by a DD.
Unfortunately, it is not packaged…
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
--
To UNSU
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:01:38AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
> can you please report on issue in the voting software that prevented
> some ballots to be processed? I sent my vote twince on April 9 and April
> 11 and got the following answer back:
Hi Luigi,
I wish you contacted m
Hi Kurt,
can you please report on issue in the voting software that prevented
some ballots to be processed? I sent my vote twince on April 9 and
April 11 and got the following answer back:
This is an error report about your vote [record msg00392.raw]
for the vote
"Debian Project Lead
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> If someone can't set up a poll, I'll send another message asking for
> >> DDs to privately mail me (or maybe me-too to -vote) if they find the
> >> debates useful.
> > http://doodle.com/nmpesn9t5fwv6ewe
>
> Having this run for 7 days now, we had 72 pa
MJ Ray wrote:
> That treads on the singular "they" landmine. Also, it sounds like
> it's the Debian Developer's validity in question.
>
> How about "Debian Developers may nominate themselves by sending a
> signed email to debian-vote@lists.debian.org"?
>
How about: "To be valid, a Debian Devel
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>l...@liw.fi wrote:
>
>>While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
>>iteration of this discussion, in favor of having a discussion about
>>platforms and some Q&A with the candidates?
>Maybe this is a good time to a
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Maybe this is a good time to ask the candidates what is their position
> wrt this PC bullshit.
> So candidates, what do you think about this?
[ Just assuming this was a serious question, otherwise shame on me for
keeping this thread
l...@liw.fi wrote:
>While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
>iteration of this discussion, in favor of having a discussion about
>platforms and some Q&A with the candidates?
Maybe this is a good time to ask the candidates what is their position
wrt this PC bullshit.
So ca
>> If someone can't set up a poll, I'll send another message asking for
>> DDs to privately mail me (or maybe me-too to -vote) if they find the
>> debates useful.
> http://doodle.com/nmpesn9t5fwv6ewe
Having this run for 7 days now, we had 72 participants.
The question asked was
"Are the Debian D
ma, 2009-03-09 kello 19:37 +1100, Ben Finney kirjoitti:
> Matthew Johnson writes:
>
> > How about accepting that "he" is the gender-neutral pronoun in
> > English?
>
> Because that's not true; “he” is a male-gender pronoun.
While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
iter
Matthew Johnson writes:
> How about accepting that "he" is the gender-neutral pronoun in
> English?
Because that's not true; “he” is a male-gender pronoun. The pronoun
“he” is sometimes awkwardly and explicitly defined for
gender-neutral use in specific cases, but it's never the case that
“he” i
On Sun Mar 08 23:40, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> How about "Shepherds Bush (Central line)"?
>
How about accepting that "he" is the gender-neutral pronoun in English?
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project
Secretary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The nomination period has ended and we're now in the campaigning
> period. We have 2 candidates:
>
> - Stefano Zacchiroli
> - Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>
>
> The page at http://www.debian.o
Carsten Hey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> > > nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lis
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> > nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists"
>
> > this nicely avoid
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> > nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists"
>
> "a Debian Developers
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You mean I can nominate someone else? ;-P
> (suggested phrasing:
> "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists"
> this nicely avoids gen
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Pr
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:36:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
> >want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
> >mail to
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> > > wrote:
> > > > To be valid, a Debi
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
>want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
>mail to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org list.
I hereby nominate myself as a candid
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> > wrote:
> > > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > > which he nominates himse
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> > list.
>
> Can't women nomin
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> > list.
> Can't women nominat
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
wrote:
> To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> list.
Can't women nominate themselves?
Best regards,
Per
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vot
> Perhaps someone could set up a poll for DDs to indicate whether they
> find the debates useful or not? [I think Jeroen was doing this last?]
> If someone can't set up a poll, I'll send another message asking for
> DDs to privately mail me (or maybe me-too to -vote) if they find the
> debates use
Steve Langasek wrote: [...]
> I'd like to raise the question of whether these IRC debates are really
> something we should have. I know Don and the panelists put a lot of time
> and effort into making the debates happen, which is part of why I ask the
> question: is it really worth all this effo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:57:24PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
>Maybe folks decide who they would like before the voting starts which
>would avoid the need for anything like an IRC chat or a ML discussion.
>Would it useful to get a sense of how DD's de
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:50:24PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:10:38AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > > | Period | Start| End|
> > > |+
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'd like to raise the question of whether these IRC debates are
> really something we should have. I know Don and the panelists put a
> lot of time and effort into making the debates happen, which is part
> of why I ask the question: is it really worth a
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
