On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:28:34PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:45:37AM +0200]: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > > > > Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate > > > > So I have no source at all that is can tell me the number of DDs? > > You can fetch the number of active DD keys [1,2], and add to it the > number of removed 1024D keys [3]. When a person who had their key > removed due to being too short presents a new key, we take the old one > out of the removed-1024 tree as well. People with 1024D keys cannot > vote, but don't lose their DD status.
As far as I know relying on the keyring and ldap has always been incorrect. The number was always off by a few. > Of course, the only authoritative number should be in the hands of > DAM. But we have something, uh, quite close to it. It's was my understanding that DAM says that nm.debian.org is authoritative. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150417070901.ga7...@roeckx.be
