On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:12:01 -0200, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>>
>>> But it's still opensource, so the source code is free to download and
>>> compile. The guys at CentOS do it, they get all the source code for RHL,
>>> re
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:29:03PM GMT, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>> >> To clarify things up (ok, a b
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Joe wrote:
>
> I think, as usual with Linux graphics, that we are talking drivers here.
>
> I don't really think this is fixable. The MB is two-three years old. So
> not old enough to write off as useless, but not brand-new either.
For the latest Fedora beta, "gno
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> The 'getent' utility is part of GNU glibc and is present on any GNU
> glibc based system but not present on others. It won't work on HP-UX
> for example.
"getent" exists in Solaris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:34:36 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> For the latest Fedora beta, "gnome-shell will run even on hardware
>> without a native 3D driver, including virt guests."
>
> Umm, there isn't a
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:14:07 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Walter Hurry
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:34:36 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the latest Fed
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Kevin Ross wrote:
>
> Why weren't the new gnome packages named with a "3" in their name, to allow
> both gnome 2 and gnome 3 to exist in the repositories, and allow the user to
> choose which one they want? After all, we had apache and apache2, php4 and
> php5, mys
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Chris Davies wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM, T o n g wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> I know how to get an IP address *info* using dig, but has anyone looked
>>> into how to get *only* the IP address? so that I can u
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:27:50 +, Richard wrote:
>
>> I asked on the -dev list but no avail, I have googled, but whats the
>> difference between dependency level 1 and dependency level 2 on software
>> transitions
>
> "No avail"?
"but no avail
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:29 PM, shiyao ma wrote:
>
> Once again, I added export LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 in my .zshrc
> However, I do not think it will affect the locale of my GUI software...
With bash, you'd edit "/etc/profile" or "~/.profile"; with zsh, no idea.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> I am running Sid and X thru startx.
> It appears that on restarting X the tty it uses dwells to tty8.
> I wonder why I want that feature, it's annoying.
> Found a reference to it:
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103765
> 'Ps
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> With bash, you'd edit "/etc/profile" or "~/.profile"; with zsh, no idea.
>
> That won't work for logins from an xdm such as gdm, kdm or lightdm.
It works for gdm, at least
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> El 2011-11-22 a las 07:50 +0200, Israel Bravo escribió:
>> On 11/21/2011 07:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> > El 2011-11-21 a las 08:51 +0200, Israel Bravo escribió:
>> >
>> >> On 11/20/2011 05:27 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> >>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:42:08
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Tom H wrote:
>> >> With bash, you'd edit "/etc/profile" or "~/.profile"; with zsh, no idea.
>> >
>> > That won't work for login
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:28:15 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I've been meaning to look into you "RPCMOUNTDOPTS=--no-nfs-version 4"
>> suggestion but haven't had the time.
>
> It seems that this para
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if there's a way to inject virtual packages into apt. For my
> part, I'm running a HTTP server that I've compiled and installed from
> source, and because apt doesn't know about it, it wants to install Apache or
> some other pa
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Brian wrote:
>> ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
>> # This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type the
>> # menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to change
>> # the 'exec tail' line above.
>> menuentry "DOS
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
>
> Tom -
>
> Thanks.
>
> Here is the changed file.
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec tail -n +3 $0
> # This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type
> the
> # menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to ch
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Fredrik Tolf
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if there's a way to inject virtual packages into apt. For
>>> my
>&g
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, bd satish wrote:
>
> [~]:11 $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-39) (da...@debian.org)
> (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Thu Nov 3 03:41:26 UTC
> 2011
>
> [~]:12 $ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
> linux-image-2
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 05 Dec 2011 at 08:44:51 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>> When I run update-grub, it appears to be working but ends with
>> something akin to an error:
>>
>> root # update-grub
>> Generating grub.cfg ...
>> Found background image:
>> /u
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-12-20 14:20:51 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> But I think this discussion of /etc/default/ collisions is all rather
>> academic. No one has yet to mention any real world case of a problem.
>> Just the potential that it might be a p
2011/12/27 Дмитрий Огородников :
>
> I have slow DHCP and TFTP-server with debian installer. Whet I try to
> install Debian (squeeze 6.0.3), installer sets IP to 164.254.x.x
> instead of waiting DHCP respond.
>
> Adding "d-i netcfg/dhcp_timeout string 60" doesn't change this
> behavior. Installer s
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 28/12/11 12:14, Дмитрий Огородников wrote:
>>
>> I have slow DHCP and TFTP-server with debian installer. Whet I try to
>> install Debian (squeeze 6.0.3), installer sets IP to 164.254.x.x
>> instead of waiting DHCP respond.
>>
>> Adding "
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 28/12/11 19:41, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Scott Ferguson
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/12/11 12:14, Dmitry wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have slow DHCP and TFTP-server with debian insta
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> I know this is a FAQ, so apologies, but after much googling I've been unable
> to find a remedy.
>
> I run my own caching BIND9 under squeeze, and as far as I'm aware it's
> correctly set up.
>
> I'm using Thunderbird as my MUA, with an
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Steve Kreyer wrote:
>
> after an update of my Debian system some time ago I've encountered some
> problems with sudo. In particular sudo doesn't seem to recognize any
> commands located in /sbin or /usr/sbin. For example the command useradd is
> located in /usr/sb
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 29/12/11 00:38, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Scott Ferguson
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/12/11 19:41, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Scott Ferguson
>>>&g
2012/1/4 Joel Rees :
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, chengshid wrote:
>> 于 2012年01月04日 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道:
>>> chengshid wrote:
>> rootALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL
>
> Odd that root would have to use the password where all the rest don't. But,
> ...
>
>> userALL=(ALL:ALL)NOPASSWD: ALL
>
> That's
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:42:10 +0800, lina wrote:
>
>> Is it safe to add /sbin into PATH?
>
> To you user env? If it's not an exposed system, I'd say yes.
It's even OK on an "exposed" system. Having "(/usr)/sbin" in PATH for
everyone is the default
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
>> >
>> > No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
>>
>> Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
>> proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep my lenny syst
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:42:10 +0800, lina wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it safe to add /sbin into PATH?
>>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marc Auslander wrote:
>
> Earlier posts seem to say this should/might work.
>
> I made an mdadm v 1.2 partions, and put a copy of my root file system
> on it.
>
> update-grub doesn't see it at all.
>
> if I try to boot by hand, I can get grub to boot the kernel but
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Bijoy Lobo wrote:
>
> I have read online that Debian Squeeze has no differentiation in runlevels
> from 2-5, although I would like to boot my debian box in CLI mode.
You can add "text" to the "linux" grub line.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Vi, 13 ian 12, 07:06:12, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Bijoy Lobo wrote:
>> >
>> > I have read online that Debian Squeeze has no differentiation in runlevels
>> > from 2-5, althoug
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Vi, 13 ian 12, 12:13:52, Darac Marjal wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:21:11PM +0530, Bijoy Lobo wrote:
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >
>> > I have read online that Debian Squeeze has no differentiation in
>> > runlevels
>> > from 2-
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Don Juan wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 05:27 AM, Brian wrote:
>> On Fri 13 Jan 2012 at 15:23:33 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Vi, 13 ian 12, 07:06:12, Tom H wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You can add "text" to the "linux&q
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Marc Auslander wrote:
>
> I'm still having no luck booting an mdadm 1.2 root.
>
> grub2 works - I get into the boot kernel and initram. But when it
> comes to mount the real kernel, I fall into initramfs shell with a
> message that the kernel can't be found. And
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
>
> On my desktop, which is running Squeeze, I tried to upgrade some
> packages to their Wheezy version. I have now reverted the upgrade, but I
> am alarmed.
>
> One of the packages was grub2 which was at version
> 1.98+20100804-14+sque
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
>
> /dev/sda1 63 1953520064 976760001 fd Linux raid
> autodetect
The post-MBR gap's OK.
How large is "core.img"?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2012 11:06:33 Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
>>
>> On my desktop, which is running Squeeze, I tried to upgrade some
>> packages to their Wheezy version. I have now reverted the upgrade, but I
>> am alarmed.
>>
>> One o
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Marc Auslander wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Marc Auslander wrote:
>>> I'm still having no luck booting an mdadm 1.2 root.
>>>
>>> grub2 works - I get into the boot kernel and initram.
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Marc Auslander wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>>
>> Can you unpack your initrd and check whether you have an "mdadm"
>> script in the "scripts" directory, an mdadm rule in the "udev"
>> directory, and an "
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:24:40 -0500 (EST), Arno Schuring wrote:
>> John Hasler (jhas...@newsguy.com on 2012-01-14 12:25 -0600):
>>>
>>> IMHO putting critical
>>> boot software in an "unallocated" area that other software will (not
>>> unreaso
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Regid Ichira wrote:
>
> Referring to Package: vsftpd, Version: 2.3.5-1.
>
> 1. Can I get the debian source for 2.3.4, and possibly older?
> I think debian had some version control archive for the vsftpd
> package.
The 2.3.2 and 2.3.4 tarballs are at
http://d
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 20 January 2012 14:00:59 antispammbox-debian wrote:
>>
>> In Ubuntu to install Truecrypt is easy. Why in Debian not same?
>
> I can never understand the compulsion among Ubuntu users to use Debian, and
> then complain that it is not the same
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:30 PM, David Baron wrote:
>
> Neither the 686 nor the amd64 flavors install correctly. They fail to create
> the initrd. I can use upgrade-initramfs -c and then apt-get -f install will
> finish the process. (I have not tried booting these yet.)
No probs for me with an i6
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Sylvain wrote:
> 2012/1/23 Frank :
>> On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 11:47 +0100, Sylvain wrote:
>>
>>> I already tried this option too, but it didn't help. Also according to
>>> the manpage:
>>>
>>> > The intr / nointr mount option is deprecated after kernel 2.6.25. Only
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:47 AM, lee wrote:
> Jon Dowland writes:
>
>> I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail
>> or mpop are options.
>
> What´s wrong with fetchmail?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/01/msg01476.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-u
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Sylvain wrote:
> On 24. 01. 12 09:28, Tom H wrote:
>> On 24/01/12 18:50, Sylvain wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried to SIGKILL the [nfsiod] process but it didn't get killed. I
>>> also tried to kill the various rpcbind processes but
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 20:38 +0100, Rémi Moyen wrote:
>> Le 25 janvier 2012 18:10, Sven Joachim a écrit :
>>> On 2012-01-25 18:04 +0100, Rémi Moyen wrote:
Kernel 3.2 seems to be still in unstable, I'd rather not install
something from t
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:35 PM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> 25/01/2012 19:16, Joey L wrote:
>> Okay..I am telling all in this email -:)
>>
>> My configuration is as such:
>> /dev/md0 = /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdd1
>> /dev/md1 = /dev/sda1 and /dev/sb1
>>
>> My swap partitions are not part o
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 23:51 +0100, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> The metapackage has not yet migrated, it seems. But 3.1 really is not
>>> supported any
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Richard wrote:
>
> What is the latest kernel release in unstable ?
> I'm seeing 3.1.0.1, yet there are mentions of 3.2 in earlier postings.
3.2's still in unstable. Just run:
# aptitude update
...
#
# aptitude search linux-image -F '%p %t %v %V'
linux-image
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2012 16:19:06 Richard Owlett wrote:
>> Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> > On 25/01/12 06:21, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> >> I downloaded a 770MB file titled
>> >> debian-live-6.0.3-i386-lxde-desktop.iso . Burned a DVD.Got some
>> >> su
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Hiestand wrote:
>> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
>> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
>> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working in my preseed:
>
> If you swap back
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Chris Hiestand wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:48 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>>> I've had a stable, working, preseed configuration with no changes
>>> other than downloading the latest stable debian releases (netboot
>>> images). Suddenly partman has stopped working i
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> These problems are due to the mismatch between the new udeb files in
> the 6.0.4 point release and the previous 6.0.3 netboot files on my
> (and your) server. The netboot files needed to be updated. Updating
> them solved my problem. And now
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
>
> I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a bug report
> successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no mail server active
> on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to setup exim several times and
> have alway
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Serious, you're using a Mac [1], there's nothing I could imagine that's
> more un-libre. I really wonder why you won't use the proprietary driver.
Aren't you conflating Apple hardware and OS?1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 03/02/12 20:33, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> On 03/02/12 05:36, David Christensen wrote:
>>>
>>> $ apt-cache search backup | less
>>>
>>> HTH,
>
>> It's hardly likely to.
>
> Huh?
>
> Hardly likely to what?
to help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jens Tobiska wrote:
>
> I am trying to install debian on a lenovo x61 with an intel 4965AGN built in
> wifi card from a usb stick.
>
> The installation fails when trying to find wireless access points. It then
> asks me to enter ESSID and password which I do. It th
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Jan Moskyto Matejka wrote:
>> >
>> > Wireless internet works from the same computer in windows with WPA2-PSK,
>> > AES.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to make the installer find my network?
>>
>> The installer can only deal with WEP encrytpion:
>>
>> http://www.debian.org
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:18:38 +, Brian wrote:
>
>> On Sun 05 Feb 2012 at 21:09:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:12:26 +, Brian wrote:
>>>
>>> > Your proposal fits the remit of debian-...@lists.debian.org.
>>>
>>> Agree
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:28:45 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:18:38 +, Brian wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun 05 Feb 2012 at 21:09:26 +,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Russell L. Harris
wrote:
Some GPT labelled disks need to have the boot flag set on the
"bios_grub" partition (in violation of the EFI spec) for a box to be
bootable. And some Lenovo models are affected.
> (1) It seems that everything goes back to Intel, which in
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:26:27 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:28:45 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Russell L. Harris
wrote:
> * Tom H [120207 12:12]:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Russell L. Harris
>> wrote:
>> Some GPT labelled disks need to have the boot flag set on the
>> "bios_grub" partition (in viola
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Russell L. Harris
> wrote:
>> * Tom H [120207 12:12]:
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Russell L. Harris
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> So I plan to reboot the GParted-Live flash U
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Russell L. Harris
>> wrote:
>>> * Tom H [120207 12:12]:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Russell L. Harris
>>>>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:27:19 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> I don't know where these features use to be advertized, I follow
>>> debian- news, debian-announce,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:24:18 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:27:19 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>>> The announcement of the availability of WPA in d-i
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Ernest Adrogué wrote:
>
> I was setting some key bindings in emacs and it puzzled me
> that some of those bindings worked in emacs-x but not in emacs-nox.
>
> Then I fired up emacs in a tty, in an X terminal emulator and also a
> graphical frame and quoted-insert s
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:09:43 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>>>> I read about the GRUB2 transition from Debian Planet and I'm sure
>>>>> sure it was aired i
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> I'm getting confused by what I see in /etc/network/interfaces,
> compared to what I see with ifconfig -a.
>
> What I see in /etc/network/interfaces:
>
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> allow-hotplug eth0
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
>
> Doe
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:13:22 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>>
>>> So it appears at a superficial reckoning that dhcp has assigned an
>>> address to eth0, but that address appears to be attached to eth1 in
>>> ifconfig and ne
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Brian writes:
> and hostname -i shows:
>
> 127.0.1.1 192.168.1.42
AFAIK, these days this only works if "192.168.1.42" is in "/etc/hosts"
or in the nis/nisplus/ldap equivalent.
> I vaguely remember bringing up the second address with if
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Jesse Thompson writes:
>> the interfaces file is really only going to come into pay during
>> bootup, or when using eg ifup/ifdown scripts.
>>
>> You indicated that you may have configured the interfaces by hand via
>> ifconfig; if so those
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I post a few things following todays reboot
>
> I have connected something to the other ethernet port now ... and so
> ifconfig -a reports (with me doing nothing special but having
> rebooted):
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:4
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> I have now wired both up. The one that gets the hosts 192.168.1.42
> address is eth1 and is hardcoded at the lan router/dns server by MAC
> to get that address.
>
> eth0 is getting a dns served address too now.
>
> In fact I've now created
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> I have found the following two d-i-related pages the second of which
>> mentions WPA:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/ReleaseAnnounce
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/WheezyGoals
>
> Yes, the "goal" is there but how ab
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 12 Feb 2012 at 13:34:45 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>> What explains this apparent anomaly?
>>
>> I can't explain why eth0 has an Ip address but it isn&#
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:53:19 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> There was the wpasupplicant-udeb bug that was closed mid-2011 and that I
>> posted earlier in the thread - and it must've been tracked by
>> debian-boot i
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Martin T wrote:
> During Debian installation there is a question about "hostname" using
> expert installation mode.
In both modes but I don't think that "regular" mode asks you for a domain.
> Am I correct, that "hostname" inserted during Debian installation i
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Chris Davies wrote:
>
> My understanding is that NM will not touch any interface that is defined
> in /etc/network/interfaces. So, theoretically at least, if you simply
> go ahead and declare the interfaces "it will all just work".
Check "/etc/NetworkManager/Netwo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> I decided to try a third way; reverse the device names on the host.
>
> However I'm not really sure how to do that so that it persists thru
> updates.
>
> The way I did do it was to reverse the names in:
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-ne
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 09:18 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Chris Davies
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My understanding is that NM will not touch any interface that is defined
>>> in /etc/network/
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 12:20 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
>>> On 02/13/2012 09:18 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Chris Davies
>>>> wrote:
&g
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
>> On 02/13/2012 12:20 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
>>>> On 02/13/2012 09:18 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>>>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
>>> On 02/13/2012 12:20 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 03:06 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> From http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/SystemSettings
>>
>>
>> The ifupdown plugin also uses the
>> /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf file (0.7 and
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>
>> Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you can
>> complain about tracker.
>
> More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as
> requirement
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Given this enormous amount
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Given this enormous amount
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
&
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, green wrote:
>
> I am *not* looking for disposable hardware. I am *not* interested in
> purchasing a maintenance burden. I need *rock-solid* *long-term* Linux
> reliability on *rock-solid* hardware. Will Compulabs continue to provide
> updated custom kernels a
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:01:34 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl
>> wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> [1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/3.2.2/sources/
>>
>> This lin
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:41:59 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>>>> This requirement comes from upstream.
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like
>>> to kn
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 14.02.2012 18:49, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps Debian's GNOME maintainers could change the dependency to a
>> "file indexer" and have users choose the indexer that strikes their
>> fancy (I'm
1101 - 1200 of 1896 matches
Mail list logo
