On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you >>>>> can complain about tracker. >>>> >>>> More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as >>>> requirement "now". It was not just a few weeks ago. >>> >>> This requirement comes from upstream. >> >> (...) >> >> Any document to support that statement? > > Tom is right. > gnome-documents is in the official set of apps for GNOME 3.2 [1] and the > gnome meta package is just following upstream here. > > That said, it's a meta package. If you don't like it, don't use it. > > [1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/3.2.2/sources/
This link was useful, thanks. I think the following's what Camaleon's looking for: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-documents/0.1/gnome-documents-0.1.92.news has "Require Tracker 0.12.1". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxgbx94onq27avmmfalrmpare9tfd9eldvh-5u6cwr...@mail.gmail.com
