On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Raf Czlonka <r...@linuxstuff.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:29:03PM GMT, Tom H wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka <r...@linuxstuff.pl> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>> >> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic): >> >> >> >> Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is the supporte >> > >> > To clarify things, Red Hat Linux _was_ a distro available as a free >> > download with or without commercial support. >> > >> > What you are talking about is Red Hat _Enterprise_ Linux. >> >> Very true; "_was_" is the correct tense. But I was talking about RHL, >> the distribution that RH published before moving to a RHEL/Fedora >> model. > > I know you were talking about RHL, I was replying to Ismael. OK :) >> You can't get RHEL for free, even the "self-support" option has a yearly >> cost... > > Yes, I'm aware of that. Rule of thumb: if it's free it's not RHEL. > If free is what you're after: CentoOS, Fedora, etc. > Hint: registered trademarks. Not just trademarks. The "self-support" includes updates. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sxo9qpg-wk061ao4pbwpuyj+c6u3p_ktzgrhfpdwsb...@mail.gmail.com
