On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (...) > >>> What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like >>> to know. >> >> It doesn't take much to check that GNOME pulls in GNOME Documents! > > Oh, really? > > Look at the subject and then review my first post ;-)
I knew your first post but I thought that you'd forgotten it... You're disagreeing with the GNOME developers installing Tracker by default (whatever the actual dependency chain is). It's their right and their choice; and, in their view, having Tracker by default in GNOME enhances their DE. It's also your right to disable/remove/replace Tracker (one method that I haven't mentioned before is "equivs"; it's more work but it's another possibility) should you choose to do so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SxjhsvH0S6dKUbkzD3_WV9TVpAFX=ekrloxke9pecb...@mail.gmail.com
