On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> wrote: > Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:13:22 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: >>> >>> So it appears at a superficial reckoning that dhcp has assigned an >>> address to eth0, but that address appears to be attached to eth1 in >>> ifconfig and netstat output. >> >> Check out "dmesg | grep -i eth", maybe the interface got renamed >> sometime. > > dmesg | grep -i eth > > [1178198.100780] device eth1 entered promiscuous mode > [1188657.808177] device eth1 left promiscuous mode > > Those were the only hits, so apparently eth0 is not being seen at all.
eth1 should be there. Weird. What's in "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=Swn8CVSwgqvGYvZn2i5MpX=qmjbyn6tjvspfkugqg1...@mail.gmail.com
