On 2016-08-13 16:01, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Ok, now I know it is not my box sending mail, as I diconnected it from
> the network, and received about 50 of those mails with shown time
> while it was not on the net.
> I will not worry about them, and kill them.
> Thank you
It's nothing more you
On 13/08/2016 16:46, Hans wrote:
Hi!
Had a similar problem some years ago. Many mail servers sent me a "could not
deliver" rejectmails (about 50-100 mails, which could be easily ruled by
spamassassin).
Someone misused my e-mail address, so I get all the stuff back. I guess, it
will also be ea
Hi!
Had a similar problem some years ago. Many mail servers sent me a "could not
deliver" rejectmails (about 50-100 mails, which could be easily ruled by
spamassassin).
Someone misused my e-mail address, so I get all the stuff back. I guess, it
will also be easy to fake the senders ip address.
Hi,
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Since yesterday I receive those mails:
> ...
> This is the mail system at host mail.blninja.com.
Very obscure domain. They threaten you with the death penalty if you
dare to visit them.
Are you in any relation with them ?
> : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[64.233
Hi
Since yesterday I receive those mails:
(I put only the header)
Received: from zimbra91-e16.priv.proxad.net (LHLO
zimbra91-e16.priv.proxad.net) (172.20.243.146) by
zimbra91-e16.priv.proxad.net with LMTP; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:16:11 +0200
(CEST)
Received: from mail.blninja.com (mx28-g26.priv.
Hello
I am running websites build wordpress on a virtual debian (7.4) server. But
wordpress cant send mail. It seems everthing is OK. I installed sendmail
but result didn't changed. I want to send you some configuration files or
log but I dont know which one will be beneficial to solve problem. Ho
On 2011-10-11, Al Eridani wrote:
>
> I'll stop here, as it seems to be a waste of time to try to answer your
> original
> question, because "no hay peor sordo que el que no quiere o'ir"
It is a waste of time because this person's horse is so high no reason
or principle can attain her saddle posi
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:42:13 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:58:58 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
"Pasao" is not a valid word in Spanish
>>>
>>> Absolutely correct.
>
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:54:59 +0200
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 11/10/11 19:25, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:58:58 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Camaleón
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Pasao" is not a valid word in Spanish
> >>
> >> Absolutely correct.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:58:58 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> "Pasao" is not a valid word in Spanish
>>
>> Absolutely correct.
>
> No, it's not.
My
Absolutely correct.
was in response to yo
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:42:48 +0100
Lisi dijo:
>On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:32:02 Dom wrote:
>> In this part of England (South East, just a little North of London),
>> "dunno" is common. I would even use it myself sometimes.
>
>But would you write it? If so, perhaps it is an age thing. Are you
On 11/10/11 18:42, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:32:02 Dom wrote:
In this part of England (South East, just a little North of London),
"dunno" is common. I would even use it myself sometimes.
But would you write it? If so, perhaps it is an age thing. Are you young?
Reasonably y
On 11/10/11 19:25, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:58:58 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Camaleón wrote:
"Pasao" is not a valid word in Spanish
Absolutely correct.
No, it's not.
If you think it is, please send any authoritative reference that points
to t
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:32:02 Dom wrote:
> In this part of England (South East, just a little North of London),
> "dunno" is common. I would even use it myself sometimes.
But would you write it? If so, perhaps it is an age thing. Are you young?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-u
On 11/10/11 17:09, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:33:14 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
I didn't know using "dunno" was incorrect, I mean, when using a casual
language like the one it happens on a mailing list such this :-?
Writing "dunno"
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:58:58 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> "Pasao" is not a valid word in Spanish
>
> Absolutely correct.
No, it's not.
If you think it is, please send any authoritative reference that points
to that direction.
>> (you won't
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> "Pasao" is not a valid word in Spanish
Absolutely correct.
> (you won't find that term
> registered in the RAE dictionary which is nowadays the maximum authority
> that regulates the Spanish language). And Spanish language is very strict
> with
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:33:14 -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> I didn't know using "dunno" was incorrect, I mean, when using a casual
>> language like the one it happens on a mailing list such this :-?
>
> Writing "dunno" in English is somewhat equ
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> I didn't know using "dunno" was incorrect, I mean, when using a casual
> language like the one it happens on a mailing list such this :-?
Writing "dunno" in English is somewhat equivalent to writing "pasao"
instead of "pasado" in Spanish.
> I
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:29:23 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 07:52 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> This can sound a bit rare but for us
>> (Spanish speaking users) is very hard to write some Enghlish words like
>> "don't know". We are not used to apostrophes and the word "know" is
>> spe
On 10/09/2011 07:52 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> This can sound a bit rare but for us
> (Spanish speaking users) is very hard to write some Enghlish words like
> "don't know". We are not used to apostrophes and the word "know" is
> specially difficult for us (you won't see many words in Spanish with
>
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:28:44 +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:37:03 + (UTC) Camaleón
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:25:03 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>
>> > On 06/10/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
>> >> OTOH, I dunno how Claws manages this,
>>
>> > Camaleón, I know English i
On 09/10/11 00:28, Joe wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:37:03 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:25:03 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 06/10/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
OTOH, I dunno how Claws manages this,
Camaleón, I know English isn't your first language, although you
wri
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:37:03 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:25:03 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> > On 06/10/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
> >> OTOH, I dunno how Claws manages this,
>
> > Camaleón, I know English isn't your first language, although you
> > write it extremel
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:25:03 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 06/10/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
>> OTOH, I dunno how Claws manages this,
> Camaleón, I know English isn't your first language, although you write
> it extremely well. I hope, therefore, that you won't take offence at my
> picking y
On 06/10/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
OTOH, I dunno how Claws manages this,
Camaleón, I know English isn't your first language, although you write
it extremely well. I hope, therefore, that you won't take offence at my
picking you up on the ghastly contraction "dunno". The correct usage is
"I don
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:33:14 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:04:48 +0100, richard2 wrote:
>
> > having to send from my laptop still with evo as claws mail goes the the
> > google all mail box which has 34000 messages in and tries to filter or
> > some thing, its takes over ha
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:04:48 +0100, richard2 wrote:
> having to send from my laptop still with evo as claws mail goes the the
> google all mail box which has 34000 messages in and tries to filter or
> some thing, its takes over half hour each time it goes to fetch mail. I
> use imap on my android
Hi
having to send from my laptop still with evo as claws mail goes the the
google all mail box which has 34000 messages in and tries to filter or
some thing, its takes over half hour each time it goes to fetch mail.
I use imap on my android phone and the laptop and both only look a the
google inbo
On 09/10/2006 04:40 PM, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> Did you notice any problems lately in yahoo mail, or it is just me?
>
> I'm using firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-1, and I'm used to get the following
> error when trying to delete, mark read, mark as spam... any of the yahoo
> mail command buttons.
>
> Sorry,
Hi
Did you notice any problems lately in yahoo mail, or it is just me?
I'm using firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-1, and I'm used to get the following
error when trying to delete, mark read, mark as spam... any of the yahoo
mail command buttons.
Sorry, Bad Request.
Your browser sent a request that this
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:12:07AM -0400, Jim Lynch wrote:
> I'm trying to get mail working through my isp and have a basic problem. My
> isp, bellsouth, requires a username and password to permit mail being
> relayed through them. Firefox and Mozilla have sections in the SMTP server
> options t
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:12:07AM -0400 or thereabouts, Jim Lynch wrote:
> I'm trying to get mail working through my isp and have a basic problem. My
> isp, bellsouth, requires a username and password to permit mail being
> relayed through them. Firefox and Mozilla have sections in the SMTP serv
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:12:07AM -0400, Jim Lynch wrote:
> I'm trying to get mail working through my isp and have a basic problem. My
> isp, bellsouth, requires a username and password to permit mail being
> relayed through them. Firefox and Mozilla have sections in the SMTP server
> options t
I'm trying to get mail working through my isp and have a basic
problem. My isp, bellsouth, requires a username and password to
permit mail being relayed through them. Firefox and Mozilla have
sections in the SMTP server options to put that. However I cannot
find where I need to place them when u
I have /var on a separate partition; the partition was full because somebody
hadn't checked it and cleaned it out.
Somebody, meaning me!!!
What more can I say?!
Thanks.
Cheryl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can anybody tell me what's broken in unstable re: mail and what the fix
is?
after upgrading last night I found I couldn't send mail from pine. I get:
"mail not sent. error 451; error writing to spool." and while fetchmail
appears to work, my mail never gets to pine. Fortunately I'm running
testing
I'm losing mail sent to some recipients without a warning. I suspect the
problem is that some recipient's ISP mail servers fail the message
because they can't recognise my machine ("roz"), even though I'm sending
the mail via SMTP auth to my ISP.
Header excerpt:
Received: from roz ([xx.xxx.xxx.3
> Is somebody has any idea? Mozilla problem? ISP problem?
>
> Thanks in advance for help,
> Joel
>
> PS: I think that I already met this problem with NS-4.77 onto a woody dist
but
> do not find any solution at this time.
>
mta was misconfigured i guess ..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Hi all,
I am running an sid (apt-get dist-upgrade last Friday, March 22) on a i386 with
mozilla (0.9.9-1) as mail interface with Xfce 3.8.14c as desktop.
Last Saterday, I tried to send a simple patch ascii text as an attachment to
xfce maintainer.
I waited well an half hour before have to cancel
Hi all,
I am running an sid (apt-get dist-upgrade last Friday, March 22) on a i386 with
mozilla (0.9.9-1) as mail interface with Xfce 3.8.14c as desktop.
Last Saterday, I tried to send a simple patch ascii text as an attachment to
xfce maintainer.
I waited well an half hour before have to cancel
(sorry for the bad quoting, I seem to have missed the beginning of the
thread)
| =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6geli_Marc?= said:
| I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that
| every e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my
nate muttered:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6geli_Marc?= said:
> > Hi everybody
> >
> > I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that
> > every e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my
> > "incoming" folder at "/var/spool/exim". Shouldn't this e-mail be
> > forwardet to
=?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6geli_Marc?= said:
> Hi everybody
>
> I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that
> every e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my
> "incoming" folder at "/var/spool/exim". Shouldn't this e-mail be
> forwardet to user's e-mail directory?
mos
Hi everybody
I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that every
e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my "incoming"
folder at "/var/spool/exim". Shouldn't this e-mail be forwardet to user's
e-mail directory?
I get the following error-message:
This message wa
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 12:55:56PM -0800, George A. Dowding wrote:
> I am using exim as my MTA. I have a DSL with a static IP. Every once
> in a while mail can not be delivered to certain hosts. I have
> sucessfully sent a one line message to that host, but anything larger
> causes this time ou
I am using exim as my MTA. I have a DSL with a static IP. Every once
in a while mail can not be delivered to certain hosts. I have
sucessfully sent a one line message to that host, but anything larger
causes this time out error.
What can I do?
Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was c
Hi,
This problem is related to exim not answering to port 25 for
some reason. I'm having this same problem and I was not able to fix it!
As suggested in another thread, verify if you've a loopback
device (lo) with ifconfig. But I'm not sure this should be enough to fix
the proble
look at /var/log/mail.log
to see what is happening with the mail system
i also suggest having fetchmail log to a file using the -L option.
nate
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jay Kelly wrote:
neutec >Hello Guys,
neutec >Im using sendmail a localhost server and fetchmail to download my mail
from
neutec
* Jay Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok it looks like its downloading the mail but I cant find it anywhere. I
> start mutt and there is nothing there. I cd/var/mail/neutec and theres no
> mail there.
Your mail is probably in /var/spool/mail/$USER.
man muttrc:
,
|mailboxes filena
Jay Kelly wrote:
>
> Hello Guys,
> Im using sendmail a localhost server and fetchmail to download my mail from
> my ISP. When I run fetchmail it says "1 message for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
> mypop3.com (1063 ectets).
> reading message 1 of 1 (1063 octets) . flushed
>
> Ok it looks like its downloadi
Hello Guys,
Im using sendmail a localhost server and fetchmail to download my mail from
my ISP. When I run fetchmail it says "1 message for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
mypop3.com (1063 ectets).
reading message 1 of 1 (1063 octets) . flushed
Ok it looks like its downloading the mail but I cant find it any
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Allan M. Wind wrote:
wind >Is this the correct format?
from what i could see on www.sendmail.org it is ..
wind >Hmm... that sounds like normal behavior to me. If you serve the
wind >domain and the user doesn't exist, sendmail should correctly
wind >reject mail.
i'd hope it
On 2000-01-23 16:35:54, aphro wrote:
> i reconfigured sendmail to use
> mailertables(via sendmailconfig) and set /etc/mail/mailertable to include:
>
> .aphroland.orgsmtp:firetrail.com
> .mac-resources.comsmtp:firetrail.com
Is this the correct format?
> but it appeaars it is ignoring
On 2000-01-23 14:46:28, aphro wrote:
> wind >Clearly, you are hosting something on galactica, otherwise mail for
> wind >your "local" user would be forwarded to your other machine. What is
> wind >the mx record for galactica? Do you have a domain hosted on bebo and
> wind >some users from that d
Ok..i've been playing around with this for the past 2 hours and still its
not doing what i'm expecting it to do ..(i just ordered the sendmail book
from www.ora.com to help me too) i reconfigured sendmail to use
mailertables(via sendmailconfig) and set /etc/mail/mailertable to include:
.aphroland.
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Allan M. Wind wrote:
wind >Clearly, you are hosting something on galactica, otherwise mail for
wind >your "local" user would be forwarded to your other machine. What is
wind >the mx record for galactica? Do you have a domain hosted on bebo and
wind >some users from that doma
On 2000-01-22 22:39:50, aphro wrote:
> I have 2 machines that handle 99% of my accounts. 1 is acting mail
> server(bebo.firetrail.com) and the other does everything
> else(galactica.firetrail.com)
>
> all of the domains i host MX to mail.firetrail.com (which goes to
> bebo.firetrail.com).
Ok.
I asked about this before but never saw a reply so i'll ask again.
I have 2 machines that handle 99% of my accounts. 1 is acting mail
server(bebo.firetrail.com) and the other does everything
else(galactica.firetrail.com)
all of the domains i host MX to mail.firetrail.com (which goes to
bebo.fire
>> "DM" == Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> Why am I getting all those unresolved dependencies? I thought that
DM> was what equivs was for?
The version in slink does not work well with apt. You installed a new
equivs package with different dependencies, but there is a equivs with
th
Hi Folks,
I wanted to get rid of exim install qmail. I didn't want to use the
qmail src deb, because it's only 1.02, so I got the source and compiled
it myself.
Now, obviously a lot of things are going to complain loudly if I get rid
of my MTA, so acting on something I saw on the list, I used the
>> "SZ" == Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SZ> I called my linux box virge. I didn't use the standard host.domain
SZ> format. So what is the best solution for this?? Thx.
Use the host.domain format.
Edit /etc/hosts
find /etc/ -type f | xargs grep virge
will find other files containing
Hi,
Some mail servers seem rejecting the mails send by my linux box.
Here is the message.
|- Failed addresses follow: -|
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... transport smtp: 501 EHLO requires a valid
host name as operand: 'virge'
rejected from root@ remote
Gosh, I love typing mail over telnet!
Smail has just died on me, giving errors such as:
07/02/1998 17:41:08: [m0yrbZe-A1C] Deferred TO:debian-user@lists.debian.org
ROUTER:smart_host TRANSPORT:smtp ERROR:(ERR164) transport smtp: BIND server
failure: : Connection timed out
I am stuck... here
Upon more fiddling, I find that sendmail is listening on port 25, and
mailq informs me that there have been attempts at communication:
eyry:/home/hawk# mailq
Mail Queue (8 requests)
--Q-ID-- --Size-- -Q-Time- Sender/Recipient
QAA015758 Thu J
At 3:51 AM -0500 on 6/10/98, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>It is probably a simple oversight. Had you reported it, it could no doubt
>be fixed easily (Miquel has indicated that he has already fixed some things
>as necessary). I don't think a simple bug such as this is sufficient
>to comment on the quality
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
: On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:15:42 -0500 (CDT), Nathan E Norman wrote:
:
: >: None at all. It is a general Linux question which really isn't
: >: specific to Debian at all.
:
: >Not to hack on you for "not reading the thread", but had you done so you
: >m
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:15:42 -0500 (CDT), Nathan E Norman wrote:
>: None at all. It is a general Linux question which really isn't
>: specific to Debian at all.
>Not to hack on you for "not reading the thread", but had you done so you
>might have noticed that Miquel van Smoorenburg not only
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
: On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:50:21 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
:
: >So your advice to avoid qpopper is not necessarily relevant to Debian?
:
: It is as relevant to Debian as a message containing advice to avoid
: cucipop is. Or advice to use qpopper is.
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:50:21 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>So your advice to avoid qpopper is not necessarily relevant to Debian?
It is as relevant to Debian as a message containing advice to avoid
cucipop is. Or advice to use qpopper is. Or advice to use cucipop is. Or
even a message aski
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 04:25:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >It is probably a simple oversight.
> So simple it should not have been there in the first place.
That's exactly what an oversight is.
> >Had you reported it, it could no doubt be fixed easily (Miquel has
> >>indicated that he has
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:51:41 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:41:59AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:29:10 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> >A few messages back you said that you found qpopper unacceptable because
>> >the POP send is buggy, so you prefer
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:51:41 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:41:59AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:29:10 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>>
>> >A few messages back you said that you found qpopper unacceptable because
>> >the POP send is buggy, so you pre
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:41:59AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:29:10 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> >A few messages back you said that you found qpopper unacceptable because
> >the POP send is buggy, so you preferred cucipop. Now you say cucipop
> >doesn't even have POP sen
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:29:10 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>A few messages back you said that you found qpopper unacceptable because
>the POP send is buggy, so you preferred cucipop. Now you say cucipop
>doesn't even have POP send. Am I missing something here?
Yes. You must read the *WHOLE* m
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 09:43:07AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 1998 09:36:04 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> >Well, that depends. I'm not sure if cucipop impliments the nonstandard
> >POP send protocol. I do believe that is proprietary to qpopper and not part
> >of the formal RFC.
On 9 Jun 1998 20:38:11 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>Have you bothered to file a bug report into the Debian Bug System
>about this? Then it can be fixed you know ..
No. This was before I used Debian that I noticed it and also does not
relate to my Debian system as it is on my ISP's s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
>It is just personal bias on my part against qpopper because of one
>glaring oversight they made. In the non-standard (IIRC) pop send feature,
>which I do use fr
On Tue, 09 Jun 1998 09:36:04 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>Well, that depends. I'm not sure if cucipop impliments the nonstandard
>POP send protocol. I do believe that is proprietary to qpopper and not part
>of the formal RFC. Of course, I don't have them handy to confirm, so take
>that all wit
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 12:02:50 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
>collect: premature EOM: connection reset by dial31.planters.net
>collect: I/O error on connection from dial31.planters.net
>One follows the other without fail. Should I try cucipop instead?
Well, that depends. I'm not sure if c
Thus spake "Steve Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
>
> >I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper.
> I
> >haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
> >problem is with that daemon. My Debia
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:38:04 -0500 (EST), Michael Roark wrote:
>I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper. I
>haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
>problem is with that daemon. My Debian machine is serving 600 or so
>dial-up connections for ma
I saw another list member post that we should stay away from qpopper. I
haven't heard anything - either good or bad. Do you know what the
problem is with that daemon. My Debian machine is serving 600 or so
dial-up connections for mail (coming and going) and authentication. If I
need to switch for
Thus spake Brian Freeze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> I just upgraded my system with the latest pop3 server qpopper from the
> debian site. I am now getting errors when ever anyone tries to log on
> and
> get there mail.
>
> Mail client returns this:
>
> ERR maillock: '/var/spool/pop/username.pop'
>
I just upgraded my system with the latest pop3 server qpopper from the
debian site. I am now getting errors when ever anyone tries to log on and
get there mail.
Mail client returns this:
ERR maillock: '/var/spool/pop/username.pop'
/var/log/messages returns this error:
Jun 9 12:53:25 www in.qp
Matthew Myers wrote:
>
> When I try to send mail to this list server using netscape mail, it never
> gets here. I sent this using pine. I have tried this before and after a
> complete Debian re-install and always have the same results. What's the
> deal with netscape mail?
You need to set up N
When I try to send mail to this list server using netscape mail, it never
gets here. I sent this using pine. I have tried this before and after a
complete Debian re-install and always have the same results. What's the
deal with netscape mail?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
When I send mail to a user on my own machine, then try to reply to it,
elm tries to reply to @machine. this is not a valid name. For
instance root mails shaleh. shaleh hits reply and gets [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
and invalid address. Where is my problem?? IS it in elm or is it in
smail? BTW this i
Which mail program do you use, smail? What's your mail server's name on the
internet? Do you get mail directly from the internet?
Mike Patterson wrote:
> If anyone can give speedy advice, it'd be greatly appreciated. Days without
> mail on my linux box are disasterous for many reasons...
>
> Basi
If anyone can give speedy advice, it'd be greatly appreciated. Days without
mail on my linux box are disasterous for many reasons...
Basically, mail doesn't work anymore. If I try sending mail from the debian
box, I get the folloring error:
What now? send
post: problem initializing server; [BHS
requested)
Subject: Fetch Mail Problem
Importance: Low
Sensitivity: Personal
Hi,
I am trying to get fetchmail to get my mail from my isp, exept everytime I
use
it (i.e. fetchmail -u ), I get an error from fetchmail
saying something about my local user name being different than my isp mail
name
>>
>> Either make a local account with the same username or make an alias that
>> points to your local username.
>>
I don't really want to create another account if I can help it, but I tried
making an alias for tht user in /etc/aliases but that didn't work either. It
is just that the mail I re
You need to make it clear to fethmail who is who where. My account on my
home machine is foo, with password xxx, and on my mailserver bar with
password yyy, then my .fetchmairc looks like:
poll aurora.alaska.edu \
protocol POP3 \
timeout 200 \
user bar there with password yyy is foo here \
mda
Hi,
I am trying to get fetchmail to get my mail from my isp, exept everytime I use
it (i.e. fetchmail -u ), I get an error from fetchmail
saying something about my local user name being different than my isp mail
name, How can i correct this?
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Rick Jones wrote:
>
> Pete:
>
> I have been able to get my email to go through. There has most
> definately been a change someplace, here.
>
> I had to use the reply-to field and change my from to my systems idea
> of who I am for it to work. This means that anybody without a s
Hi,
I have a small problem with outgoing mail. I have a permanent connection
and a static ip-number. The FQDN is cal011205.student.utwente.nl and there
is a CNAME, blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl. The primary MX record for
blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl points to Cal011205.student.utwente.nl
(notice th
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> As long as the MX wasn't set up, I got a reply from the mailsystem (DNS
> lookup failed for internet-treff.uni-koeln.de) if I tried to send mail
> from the system. The same for mails to the system using the MX address
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
This
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Well, my conclusion is that you've done something to the basic smail
> satellite option - specifically, your /etc/smail/directors file has
> something in it besides the smartuser director. What you appended of your
> configuration isn't enough to tell.
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> > > Use the option "satellite system".
> >
> > No - DON'T. Satellite is useful if and only if all the usernames of
> > any account that will ever receive any mail are either mentioned in
> > /etc/aliases or match the usernames on your smarthost. A
> > Use the option "satellite system".
>
> No - DON'T. Satellite is useful if and only if all the usernames of
> any account that will ever receive any mail are either mentioned in
> /etc/aliases or match the usernames on your smarthost. Among other
> things, the satellite setup makes using fetc
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
