Hi folks,
is someone using kmail?
If yes, please verify or deny the following issue:
1. Create a new filter with a unique keyword in Subject line.
2. When the keyword is in the subject it shgall play a soundfile.
3. Now send an email with this keyword in the subject line.
Deos it play sound
Found an ugly solution:
1. Deleted the mailfolder ~/.kde/share/apps/kmail/mail/
2. Started kmail and let create the "Local Folders", which now point to
~/.kde/share/apps/kmail/
mail.directory/
and created another folder
~/.kde/share/apps/kmail/mail/
3. Then rsync all mails from
I have been doing something somewhat similar to provide a backup for
my mail server (I get mail delivered directly by SMTP to a postfix
server on a home machine.)
I have simply duplicated the postfix setup on the two machines, then I
change the port forwarding in my router to deliver it to either
Hi folks,
I am now working for hours, to get kmail running again.
Problem:
I have two computers running kmail. And I want both running the same
configuration with the
same mails on each computer. In other words: I want a clone of kmail on the
other computer.
Thus I rsynced all my mails to
Hans writes:
> Dear list,
>
> does anyone know, where kmail is storing its tags for mails? The tags I mean
> are those like "already read".
I've never done that but maybe this helps, from
https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kmail/kmail2/faq.html#transfer-mail-and-setting
Dear list,
does anyone know, where kmail is storing its tags for mails? The tags I mean
are those like "already read".
Background: When I rsync the folder with my mails, which is here ~/.kde/
share/apps/kmail/mail , to another computer, then all new mails are tagged as
"n
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:19:59 +0100
Hans wrote:
> is there a way to get all mails of kmail get indexed?
Try mairix.
apt show mairix
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Hi folks,
is there a way to get all mails of kmail get indexed?
As far as I read and understood, mails of kmail are not indexed by baloo.
Obviously akonadi is
indexing in its own way.
However, none of my mailfolders are indexed and I can not get it forced to be
indexed. They
say, akonadi
Kent West wrote:
> I don't *really* understand how Akonadi fits into Kmail/Yahoo, but,
> meh;
I don't use KDE or Kmail so I googled akonadi. The first hit is
https://userbase.kde.org/Akonadi and it starts by saying:
"The Akonadi framework is responsible for providin
On 2023-06-26, Kent West wrote:
>
> I don't *really* understand how Akonadi fits into Kmail/Yahoo, but, meh; my
> real question is: Does anyone here know if KMail *requires* a Gmail account
> to access a non-Gmail email account (and if so, that seems really stupid)?
> If not,
tall,
with only KDE Plasma and a few other pieces added in.
I wanted to give KMail a spin (it never has worked well for me because of
my GMail accounts authenticating through SSO stuff, which I've never been
able to figure out), and to start off with I figured I'd limit it to just
one non-GM
Hi folks,
I do not know, if someone did notice this too:
I am using kmail (version 5.15.3 and running into this issue, that kmail is
crashing, when there is a mail with an attachement,
As long as I any other mail is active (clicked on and reading), nothing
happens, but as soon as I click
Hi folks,
did anyone get into the problem, that a binary attachement crashes kmail?
I got into it several times, but it appears very seldom.
One was a signatur file, that let kmail crash, in two other cases it were a
pdf-file, that was attached.
The pdf-file that were attached were both
mail addresses some other way in the future.
Because it is an old version of kmail, the same behavior might not occur in
newer versions.
--
rhk
If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML;
avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma included a
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 12:08:35 EDT gene heskett wrote:
> help please.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
And ingore this, I am trying yet another install instead, kde, brltty,
and orca has dumped on me for the last time.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
help please.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Hi folks,
very rarely, but reproducable, it happens, that kmail crashes, when clicking
on a mail, that has either a pgp signature or a binary attachement.
This can happens very rarely, but a mail, that shows this effect, will crash
kmail, whenever it is clicked.
This can happen either with a
Hi folks,
I am searching a setting in kmail.
When I try to sign a mail which has an attachement in kmail, a popup appears
and I get warned, that the signing is only partly of the mail, and if I want
to change this.
So I suppose, there is somewhere a setting of this ("sign mails partl
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 21:55 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Answer myself: There is ~/.config/kmailrc, which got the known mailaddresses
> with names. However, when I delete them in this file and restart kmail, the
> mail addresses I sent to in the past. are not forgotten. So there is no
>
Answer myself: There is ~/.config/kmailrc, which got the known mailaddresses
with names. However, when I delete them in this file and restart kmail, the
mail addresses I sent to in the past. are not forgotten. So there is no change
in the behavour.
This led me to the conclusion, that these
> In my older version of kmail (on Wheezy -- I'd expect your using a newer
> version) there is a section (essentially a cache) of Recent Addresses in
> /.kde/share/config/kmailrc.
>
> If you have the same file, if you go in and edit those addresses that should
> fix the
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 05:58:53 AM Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> somehow in kmail the mailadresse and the name are confused. When I want to
> write a mail, by typing the mailadresse is intelligently fullfilled, but
> the belonging name is not correctly added. Also on most
Hi folks,
somehow in kmail the mailadresse and the name are confused. When I want to
write a mail, by typing the mailadresse is intelligently fullfilled, but the
belonging name is not correctly added. Also on most mailadresses, I get the
same name added (guess, there was never a name, so it
See the section labeled -- I think I've picked
a direction to work on, but am sending this anyway in case someone has a
better solution or for documentation of the problems I ran into. As it is for
old versions of kmail, xdotool, and dbus, it may not have much value.
I'm using km
I tried it with Thunderbird, and it works fine, so the problem seems to be
with kmail (likely akonadi).I've used kmail and kontact for years and
would like to get them working with this account. I have some deadlines at
work which will keep me too busy to work on it for a while, t
On Wednesday 01 April 2020 00:39:56 elvis wrote:
> On 31/3/20 8:16 am, Christopher Judd wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > I have an email account (through pangia.biz <http://pangia.biz>).
> > When I try to set it up as an IMAP account using kmail, all of the
> >
On 31/3/20 8:16 am, Christopher Judd wrote:
Hi, all,
I have an email account (through pangia.biz <http://pangia.biz>). When
I try to set it up as an IMAP account using kmail, all of the folders
show, but the emails only show in a couple of them. In particular,
the emails in the in
Hi, all,
I have an email account (through pangia.biz). When I try to set it up as
an IMAP account using kmail, all of the folders show, but the emails only
show in a couple of them. In particular, the emails in the inbox do not
show up. After some google searching, I've tried resta
On 2019-07-29, hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> in the latest version of kmail (debian/stable) I discovered several
> issues. As it might be possible, they belong together, I am just
> describing it here. Maybe these are already known.
>
> 1. It is not possible,
Hi folks,
in the latest version of kmail (debian/stable) I discovered several issues. As
it might be possible, they belong together, I am just describing it here. Maybe
these are already known.
1. It is not possible, to print an email any more. When I want to print an
email , I just get an
On 2019-07-04, Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an Gmail Mail account and lots of email.
> Iam not able to open this folder succesfull anymore.
> After some time I get this message.
> Unable to fetch item from backend (collection -1) Unable to retrieve item
> from
> resource.
>
> Whats the probl
I have no suggestions for your Kmail problem, you might try Thunderbird and
see if that does the job or else email the KDE team.
Keith
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:56 AM Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an Gmail Mail account and lots of email.
> Iam not able to open this folder succesful
Hello,
I have an Gmail Mail account and lots of email.
Iam not able to open this folder succesfull anymore.
After some time I get this message.
Unable to fetch item from backend (collection -1) Unable to retrieve item from
resource.
Whats the problem and how solve it.
Thanks Thomas
On Ma, 25 dec 18, 11:52:53, Nicolas George wrote:
> Katnip (2018-12-25):
> > you could try using protonmail which has pgp, it's free to start with.
>
> The problem is not the software, changing it will not help.
In this particular case it would, since ProtonMail is a webmail and app
with built-i
tate
> HozizonalScroll
> VericalScroll
>
> deleting those three keys should trigger kmail ti preset them with default
> values. Unfortunatelly HeaderState is not really readable by humans, this is
> some Qt interal dump.
>
> hefee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Op woensdag 13 februari 2019 17:25:56 CET schreef Hans:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am running into a little problem with kmail in plasma.
>
> The problem is, that the column on the very left side (the one where the
> folders like "kmail-folder" are shown) with the the defin
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:25:56 AM EST Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am running into a little problem with kmail in plasma.
>
> The problem is, that the column on the very left side (the one where the
> folders like "kmail-folder" are shown) with the the
Hi folks,
I am running into a little problem with kmail in plasma.
The problem is, that the column on the very left side (the one where the
folders like "kmail-folder" are shown) with the the definition "name" is very,
very big (more than 4000 pixels wide). But I can not
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 08:45:52 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Carl (2018-12-26):
> > OK, I literally own nitpicking.com and I wouldn't be making such
> > a big deal about the meaning of "based on."
>
> You should: it is a legal matter, where words have a very minute
> meaning.
It would be a
On 2018-12-26, Carl wrote:
> On 12/26/18 12:00 AM, John Hasler wrote:
>> rhkramer writes:
>>> Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on
>>> PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection
>>> from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whate
Carl (2018-12-26):
> OK, I literally own nitpicking.com and I wouldn't be making such
> a big deal about the meaning of "based on."
You should: it is a legal matter, where words have a very minute
meaning.
> Just say "When I wrote 'based
> on' I meant
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 07:05:02 AM Carl wrote:
> On 12/26/18 12:00 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> > rhkramer writes:
> >> Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on
> >> PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection
> >> from that time is that it w
On 12/26/18 12:00 AM, John Hasler wrote:
rhkramer writes:
Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on
PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection
from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whatever -- very
similar functionality.)
It wa
rhkramer writes:
> Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on
> PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection
> from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whatever -- very
> similar functionality.)
It was inspired by PGP and designed to be
On 12/25/18 7:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
After reading thru the *available* info, starting with Wikipedia, one
thing stands out, and perhaps explains your insistence that it never
happened, and thats the 4+ years of total silence on the subject from
its initial release in 1991, to 1996 when the a
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 04:58:23 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Gene Heskett (2018-12-25):
> > As for gpg not being pgp, you are likely correct, but what was gpg based
> > on originally if not pgp?
>
> Original code.
Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on PGP even
On Tuesday 25 December 2018 16:25:58 John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
> > [Phil Zimmermann] spent 3 years in the federal pen...
>
> Citation, please (not an old Amiga mailing list).
After reading thru the *available* info, starting with Wikipedia, one
thing stands out, and perhaps explains your
Gene Heskett (2018-12-25):
> As for gpg not being pgp, you are likely correct, but what was gpg based
> on originally if not pgp?
Original code.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Gene writes:
> [Phil Zimmermann] spent 3 years in the federal pen...
Citation, please (not an old Amiga mailing list).
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Tuesday 25 December 2018 12:48:16 John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
> > I haven't played with pgp since they jailed P.Z., and I've always
> > looked at anything newer than 2.62 as possibly equipt with a back
> > door of some sort, one of the unstated conditions for allowing his
> > release.
>
>
tomas writes:
> That corresponds to my memories of that time (including the workaround
> for the export ban which involved sending books around and scanning
> them at the other side of the pond).
And the t-shirts with the source code printed on them to be worn while
leaving the USA.
--
John Has
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:48:16AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
> > I haven't played with pgp since they jailed P.Z., and I've always
> > looked at anything newer than 2.62 as possibly equipt with a back door
> > of some sort, one of the unstated conditions for allowing his release.
>
Gene writes:
> I haven't played with pgp since they jailed P.Z., and I've always
> looked at anything newer than 2.62 as possibly equipt with a back door
> of some sort, one of the unstated conditions for allowing his release.
I'd like to see some evidence that Zimmermann was jailed. I was paying
ady a gpg-key crerated, why do I need another key
> for self encrypted mails? And do I need really 2 keys ( = 2 key
> pairs)?
>
> IMHO kmail could use the already existent key from me, but kmail does
> it only accept as a "signing key". That looks strange and is not
> logi
Hans [2018-12-25 13:11:34+01] wrote:
> The old key can only be changed either for enryption or for signing,
> but not both.
Your old key can do both if you want to. Your master key already can
sign [S]. You just need create a new subkey for encryption [E] OR modify
the expiration date of your exi
Hi Teemu,
thank you for the fast and good informations. I learned, that my
key is not capable to encrypt, but to sign mails.
This was a long time good enough for me, as no one wanted encrypted mails from
me.
I also learned, that I made a mistake in 2007, when I created the keys, that I
create
Hans [2018-12-25 11:24:13+01] wrote:
> But when I want to create the mail, I got stuck. Problem: I have
> activated, that all encrypted mails shall also be encrypted by my own
> key, but the system says, I have no own key.
>
> Ok, I could create one, but in fact, I already have a key (this mail
>
Katnip (2018-12-25):
> you could try using protonmail which has pgp, it's free to start with.
The problem is not the software, changing it will not help.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hans (2018-12-25):
> IMHO kmail could use the already existent key from me, but kmail does it only
> accept as a "signing key". That looks strange and is not logically in my mind.
I get this from your mail:
# gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 25 11:24:13 2018 CET using DSA key I
Hi Nicolas,
ok, thank you for the response. Important to know, that the behaviour of kmail
is correct. I will inform me now, what to do.
Thank you very much for the help. Your response was a great help, now I am no
more stuck.
Happy days and a good 2019!
Best
Hans
Hans (2018-12-25):
> this is weired. You should be able to verify my key on www.cacert.org.
Are you sure about what you are doing? cacert.org does not look to be
related to PGP at all.
> However, what can I do? What should I do?
Start by not top-posting, it is not accepted on this list; if you d
Hi,
this is weired. You should be able to verify my key on www.cacert.org.
However, what can I do? What should I do?
Best
Hans
> I get this from your mail:
>
> # gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 25 11:24:13 2018 CET using DSA key ID 5F093FF8
> # gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
pairs)?
IMHO kmail could use the already existent key from me, but kmail does it only
accept as a "signing key". That looks strange and is not logically in my mind.
Maybe someone can tell me, what I am thinking wrong.
Thanks in andvance and have a happy xmas!
Best
Hans
sig
.
Yeah!
Best regards and happy hacking!
Hans
> ...
>
> hi,
>
> likely it was libssl1.1 upgrade which made TLS1.2 the minimum
> version, but i'm not familiar with kmail at all so perhaps there
> is some setting in there that needs to be adjusted.
>
> for
hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am runnng into a big problem since some days. It is not possible to send
> any mails using kmail (receiving is working well) and
> also reportbug is not working any more. I am using TLS.
...
hi,
likely it was libssl1.1 upg
Hello list,
I am runnng into a big problem since some days. It is not possible to send any
mails using kmail (receiving is working well) and
also reportbug is not working any more. I am using TLS.
When I want to send a mail I get this message:
error:141A318A:SSL
thanks for your reply.
> > Well ,
> >
> > Question, what version of KMail are you using (Help:About KMail)?
> >
>
> The version I am running here is 5.7.3, which is debian/testing and 32-bit.
> However, I have to tell, that I am watching this behaviour since a
uot; might be the wrong word, my English..., better say
> "ask"?)
The attitude of Kmail development/developers is to blame. Since they started
KDE4 it became unstable and unusable, pretty fragile. Each attempt to move
them to commit to stability first was rejected, because it was
Hi Marc,
thanks for your reply.
> Well ,
>
> Question, what version of KMail are you using (Help:About KMail)?
>
The version I am running here is 5.7.3, which is debian/testing and 32-bit.
However, I have to tell, that I am watching this behaviour since a lng
time, almo
On Monday, April 23, 2018 3:07:49 AM EDT Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I believe, that akonadi is to slow to write the changes into its database.
> When erasing mails slowly, then it is fast enough.
>
Well ,
Question, what version of KMail are you using (Help:About KMail)
Hi folks,
there is a thing, I am noticing since kmail changed to akonadi. It would be
nice, if someone can confirm or deny my noticing.
The issue: When I want to delete lots of mails in my inbox folder, I am using
the "delete" key of my keyboard. Doing so, one after the other mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 15:28:37 -0500
m...@neidorff.com wrote:
> This may or may not be helpful to Charlie, but others might find it
> helpful
>
>
For the sake of others with a similar problem with the stock kmail
from within debi
This may or may not be helpful to Charlie, but others might find it helpful
I use kmail ( version 5.5.2). I have it set up to download all e-mail as
local IMAP(not stored on server) so that each message is a separate file on my
PC. Hasn't been a problem in a long time. Recently,
On 2/21/18, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-21, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 08:57:27 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Not so good. The woof is back in the shop.
>>
>> Woof? The dog?
>
> I think the woof fell in maybe.
Da woof, da woof
Da woof is on da house.
On 2018-02-21, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 08:57:27 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Not so good. The woof is back in the shop.
>
> Woof? The dog?
I think the woof fell in maybe.
--
New York was no mere city. It was instead an infinitely romantic notion, the
mysterious n
Mark Neidorff wrote:
> I respect your opinion, and the many contributions that you have made to
> this list. You and I have both been more than annoyed with bad attitudes,
> you with KDE me with my bank. I pointed out the problem that I had and
> how it has been mishandled, IMO. You mentioned "t
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 08:57:27 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> Not so good. The woof is back in the shop.
Woof? The dog?
On Tuesday 20 February 2018 20:29:07 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:20:46 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 February 2018 09:54:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I wouldn't post any information like that in an unencrypted post /
> > > email.
> >
> > twasn't to
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 12:20:46 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2018 09:54:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I wouldn't post any information like that in an unencrypted post /
> > email.
>
> twasn't too smart...
And I should have sent that sentence to you privately, and encr
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:07:29 AM EST deloptes wrote:
> Hi,
>
<<>>
> > I am a long time kmail user. I have noticed significant improvment in
> > stability and the filtering of incoming mail. I use the filtering
> > extensively.
> > Before t
On Tuesday 20 February 2018 09:54:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 09:35:33 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 February 2018 06:08:05 Curt wrote:
> > > On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a
> > >
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 09:35:33 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2018 06:08:05 Curt wrote:
> > On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a phone
> > > call generally resolves the problem, but the threat is there, and
On Tuesday 20 February 2018 06:08:05 Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a phone
> > call generally resolves the problem, but the threat is there, and
> > they know it.
>
> Five digits, huh? Like $102.55?
>
No decimal p
On 2018-02-19, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> That would result in my 5 digit balance being moved. However a phone call
> generally resolves the problem, but the threat is there, and they know
> it.
Five digits, huh? Like $102.55?
Of course here they don't have those quaint little Mom and Pop local
b
ot found anything wrong at
> all.
> >
> > yes a friend installed it and showed it to me, so the difference was
> there.
> > I also looked at Qt5 and the Sailfish OS project - it is impressive.
> >
> > > That said, I don't now, nor have I ever, used kmail, so can
#x27;ve not found
> > > anything wrong at all.
> >
> > yes a friend installed it and showed it to me, so the difference was
> > there. I also looked at Qt5 and the Sailfish OS project - it is
> > impressive.
> >
> > > That said, I don't n
ound
> > > anything wrong at all.
> >
> > yes a friend installed it and showed it to me, so the difference was
> > there. I also looked at Qt5 and the Sailfish OS project - it is
> > impressive.
> >
> > > That said, I don't now, nor have I ever, used kmai
nd showed it to me, so the difference was there.
> I also looked at Qt5 and the Sailfish OS project - it is impressive.
>
> > That said, I don't now, nor have I ever, used kmail, so can't comment
> > about the state of play there.
>
> but this friend also does not use
lled it and showed it to me, so the difference was there.
> I also looked at Qt5 and the Sailfish OS project - it is impressive.
>
> > That said, I don't now, nor have I ever, used kmail, so can't comment
> > about the state of play there.
>
> but this friend also
On Monday 19 February 2018 10:38:57 m...@neidorff.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:02:04 PM EST Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
> > > Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might
> > > simply h
ish OS project - it is impressive.
> That said, I don't now, nor have I ever, used kmail, so can't comment
> about the state of play there.
but this friend also does not user kmail and I am a heavy kmail user.
And even kmail is not the problem but the attitude of the KDE team.
were, in
the past, broken, now work again. I've not found anything wrong at all.
That said, I don't now, nor have I ever, used kmail, so can't comment
about the state of play there.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnev
m...@neidorff.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:02:04 PM EST Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
>> > Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply
>> > have to abandon it after all these yea
On Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:02:04 PM EST Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
> > Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply
> > have to abandon it after all these years.
>
> Then look at TDE, its kde fo
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Then look at TDE, its kde forked at about the 3.5 point, with kajillions
> of bugs fixed. I'm running it here, works perfect.
+1
On Sunday 18 February 2018 06:29:34 ernst doubt wrote:
> David,
>Thanks much for the heads-up. Do you have a bug report you could
> refer me to so I can check out details? I guess in some sense I'm
> quite "lucky" as I do have one instance that's continuing to function
> properly (on the lapt
On Sunday 18 February 2018 04:11:48 David Baron wrote:
> Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply
> have to abandon it after all these years.
>
Then look at TDE, its kde forked at about the 3.5 point, with kajillions
of bugs fixed. I'm running it here,
David,
Thanks much for the heads-up. Do you have a bug report you could refer me
to so I can check out details? I guess in some sense I'm quite "lucky" as I do
have one instance that's continuing to function properly (on the laptop) even
though this one is reduced to being able to send email
Kmail has been broken for weeks. No action, just excuses. Might simply have
to abandon it after all these years.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018, 11:42 PM wrote:
> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 3:59:53 PM EST ernst doubt wrote:
> > I sent a similar message to debian-kde this morning, but i
Ernst,
Things that come to mind...
The way IMAP works is e-mail is delivered to the mail server (google/gmail, is
what I think you said). Your client (kmail, thunderbird, etc) reads an email
message from the server. Then, depending on configuration, the message is saved
or deleted? So, check
1 - 100 of 837 matches
Mail list logo
