Mark Neidorff wrote: > I respect your opinion, and the many contributions that you have made to > this list. You and I have both been more than annoyed with bad attitudes, > you with KDE me with my bank. I pointed out the problem that I had and > how it has been mishandled, IMO. You mentioned "those bugs" but you > haven't given specific examples. Please give the examples.
I mainly referred to the bugs that were discussed here. I can recall that 10y ago as KDE4 came out, almost nothing worked and there was discussion why it was released so early. As in the next 2 years almost nothing changed I stayed with old KDE and never had a desire to have a look at the new KDE, though I am subscribed to the KDE list, so I follow by reading what issues people had. After 10y there are still issues with critical application and attitude is the same. This must be a joke. A joke I see not only with KDE. Similar attitude was behind systemd - so some developers developed attitude of negligence regarding needs of users. This is the problem I have. They are guided by their road map and not by user satisfaction. This is contra productive. Despite of this I hope that KDE will deliver a stable system some day, or at least where the critical application will just work. regayrds
