rhkramer writes: > Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on > PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection > from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whatever -- very > similar functionality.)
It was inspired by PGP and designed to be compatible. It could not have been based on PGP because the latter was not Open Source. There is no common code. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
