I have two identical machines and one experienced a SSD failure. I
obtained a replacement SSD and cloned the drive out of the unaffected
machine using dd. Something like:
dd bs=4096 if=/dev/sdb of=saved.img
dd bs=4096 if=saved.img of=/dev/sdb
The cloned drive functions exactly like the origina
Greetings all,
Is there anybody on the list in Forteleza, Brazil?
There's a young, female, investigative journalist there, who wants to
install Tails onto a USB stick, with a persist partition, but she hasn't
got the slightest idea of how to go about it.
Any father figures up for a free gig?
Che
Curiouser and curiouser.
I have a second dn2800mt machine that my girlfriend uses. I ran some
tests while there and I'm more uncertain than ever about what is going on.
First, hdparm does not report correctly with hyperthreading enabled just
as with the original machine. However, the problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2014 06:34 PM, andrey.ry...@bilkent.edu.tr wrote:
> hi everybody.
> i am using skype on jessie. I cannot do apt-get dist-upgrade without
> removing of skype. After apt-get dist-upgrade i can install skype and
> everything is working. Could you
> - Original Message -
> From: Andrei POPESCU
> Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package
>
>
> Assumptions:
> 1. You did not change the default priority for backports
How does one change "default priority" for backports?
On 05/15/2014 06:23 PM andrey.ry...@bilkent.edu.tr wrote:
hi everybody
I have ADATA 1Terbyte disk with FAT32 filesystem.And i cannot write and
erase files on that disk. I cannot remind when this problem arise. Before
current moment i could do any operation with the filesystem on that disk.
Google
hi all.
gnome-terminal does not start with next error:
"error constructing proxy for org.gnome.terminal..."
sequence of command
# locale-gen
# localectl set-locale LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
#reboot.
doesnot help
locale is en_US.UTF-8
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
hi everybody.
i am using skype on jessie. I cannot do apt-get dist-upgrade without
removing of skype. After apt-get dist-upgrade i can install skype and
everything is working. Could you please explain me how i can avoid the
problem?
after installing of skype i have next diagnostic message:"errors w
hi everybody
I have ADATA 1Terbyte disk with FAT32 filesystem.And i cannot write and
erase files on that disk. I cannot remind when this problem arise. Before
current moment i could do any operation with the filesystem on that disk.
Google doesnot help me. Could you help me to resolve the problem?
I see that squeeze is going to be supported a couple years more.
But I'm not sure what that means. Is apticron going to work? What should be in
/etc/apt/sources.list?
--
Glenn English
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 16:43:57, Ralph Katz wrote:
> Free Software Foundation statement may clear some confusion expressed on
> this list.
>
> https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-condemns-partnership-between-mozilla-and-adobe-to-support-digital-restrictions-management
I use RMS as a guide in the same wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Free Software Foundation statement may clear some confusion expressed on
this list.
https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-condemns-partnership-between-mozilla-and-adobe-to-support-digital-restrictions-management
>
> [...] "Only a week after the International
Thanks, Filip. I hope this would do the job.
On 05/16/2014 02:00 AM, debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
Re: Font rendering (was:Can't login to Xfce after reboot in Debian 7.5)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 08:43:01, Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have given up on Wine for running some of my Windoz only software. Too
> many glitches. I am trying to install Virtualbox and am getting installation
> errors as follows:
>
> root@supercrunch:/home/gary# aptitude install virtualbox
> Th
On 2014-05-15 21:34 +0200, A Debian User wrote:
> When you open an email in a tab, scroll down, then leave it (remove
> focus from it), when you come back, you'll see that it's returned to
> the top of the email (has scrolled back all the way up).
>
> What gives? Shouldn't you get to go back where
On 16/05/14 05:59, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 15/05/14 02:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>>> On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08,
* Scott Ferguson [2014-05-16 03:21
+1000]:
> On 16/05/14 01:39, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Scott Ferguson [2014-05-16 00:49
> > +1000]:
> >
> >> On 16/05/14 00:15, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> >>> That is useless with the modules listet above. The sound driver for
> >>> your STA92xx
On Vi, 16 mai 14, 03:21:46, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 16/05/14 01:39, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >
> > No, please do
> >
> > # echo "options snd-hda-intel model=dell" >> /etc/modprobe.d/local.conf
> >
> > as alsa-base.conf will be purged in Jessie.
>
> It's a bit hard to follow the broken thr
On 2014-05-15 22:02, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:53, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 21:49, Scott Ferguson wrote:
From the page you started this scare campaign with:-
"Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds[*1] that will allow dev
On 16/05/14 05:56, Eelis wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 21:54, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 16/05/14 05:41, Eelis wrote:
>>> On 2014-05-15 21:36, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
Because there are no restrictions.
>>>
>>> No restrictions?
>>
>> That's corre
On 16/05/14 05:53, Eelis wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 21:49, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> From the page you started this scare campaign with:-
>> "Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
>> working on deterministic builds[*1] that will allow developers to use a
>> sandbox compiled
On 16/05/14 05:51, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>> (sigh, it's 5:30am here, I'm tired)
>
> Ditto here. I have to say, this debate is somewhat interesting,
It shouldn't be a debate. Debating DRM in Iceweasel is like debating
gravity - the occup
On 2014-05-15 21:54, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:41, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 21:36, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
Because there are no restrictions.
No restrictions?
That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close
plugin. *You* are only r
On 15/05/14 02:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM ma
On 16/05/14 05:41, Eelis wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 21:36, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
>> Because there are no restrictions.
>
> No restrictions?
That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close
plugin. *You* are only restricted in
On 2014-05-15 21:49, Scott Ferguson wrote:
From the page you started this scare campaign with:-
"Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds[*1] that will allow developers to use a
sandbox compiled on their own machine with the CDM as an alte
When you open an email in a tab, scroll down, then leave it (remove
focus from it), when you come back, you'll see that it's returned to the
top of the email (has scrolled back all the way up).
What gives? Shouldn't you get to go back where you left off?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On 16/05/14 05:29, Eelis wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 20:35, Eelis wrote:
>> On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
>>
>> Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
>> says:
>>
>>“Adobe and the conten
On 2014-05-15 21:36, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
Because there are no restrictions.
No restrictions?
That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close
plugin. *You* are only restricted in how you can *playback* media
encrypted by the plugin. *If* you c
On Wednesday, 14 May, 2014 10:36 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 14/05/14 04:22, Testosticore wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May, 2014 12:04 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 13/05/14 08:07, A Debian User wrote:
On Sunday, 11 May, 2014 10:08 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
A
On 16/05/14 05:20, Eelis wrote:
Because there are no restrictions.
>>>
>>> No restrictions?
>>
>> That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close
>> plugin. *You* are only restricted in how you can *playback* media
>> encrypted by the plugin. *If* you choose to install it (an
On 2014-05-15 20:35, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
says:
“Adobe and the content industry can audit our sandbox (as it is open
so
On 16/05/14 04:51, Eelis wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 20:48, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 16/05/14 04:35, Eelis wrote:
>>> On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
>>>
>>> Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the bl
On Fri, 16 May 2014 00:29:22 +0600
Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Also, is there any better alternative to Infinality for Debian. I
> want better font rendering. The default font rendering is bad. Also
> changing the anti-aliasing and other doesn't make a big difference.
>
> -Muntasim Ul Haque
> /
On Thu, 15 May 2014 20:12:23 +0200
Eelis wrote:
Hello Eelis,
>it open source software if during runtime it starts downloading and
>running binary blobs from Adobe? :/
It (Firefox/Iceweasel) will already do that, if you let it (viz: flash).
I've not read any of the relevant articles, but presum
On 2014-05-15 20:48, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 04:35, Eelis wrote:
On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
says:
“Adobe and the content indust
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Eelis wrote:
>
> I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they won't
> provide the source code (something to do with DRM..). Can I trust that
> Iceweasel will remain open source, or will I have to switch to Lynx if I
> want to use an open source b
On 16/05/14 04:35, Eelis wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
>
> Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
> says:
>
> “Adobe and the content industry can audit our sandbox (as it is
Got the solution. Here it is:
"1) Move the infinality script out of the system profile:
/sudo mv /etc/profile.d/infinality-settings.sh
/etc/infinality-settings.sh et /
2) Change permission to exectute by everyone:
/sudo chmod a+rx /etc/infinality-settings.sh /
3) Using your favourite text e
On 16/05/14 04:29, Eelis wrote:
> Wow, you're a very angry person.. :(
Not usually.
Oh, and what sort of person do you call someone who claims to have read
things that weren't written? Someone with good intentions?
>
> On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 16/05/14 03:51, Eelis wrote
On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin.
Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts
says:
“Adobe and the content industry can audit our sandbox (as it is open
source) to assure themselves that w
On 16/05/14 04:12, Eelis wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the clarification! But now I'm confused; in what sense is
> it open source software if during runtime it starts downloading and
> running binary blobs from Adobe? :/
The plugin is separate, it doesn't change the code for Firefox/Iceweasel
- so it do
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content
On 16/05/14 04:00, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 15/05/14 01:51 PM, Eelis wrote:
>> I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they won't
>> provide the source code (something to do with DRM..). Can I trust that
>> Iceweasel will remain open source, or will I have to switch to Lynx if
>> I
On 16/05/14 03:51, Eelis wrote:
> I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts
No - you didn't. Please learn to read and stop spreading more rubbish
(or just go back to setting fire to cats and winos).
TL;DR (Too Lazy;Don't Read?)
For those concerned by this engineered scare campaign - what
On 14May15:1830+0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> I guess this is going to be a debated topic. Having seen this [1], I do not
> think there is any way to implement meaningful (for the companies) CDMs
> without
> having them in non-free.
>
> [1]
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encr
On 16/05/14 03:46, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 16/05/14 02:13, Gary Dale wrote:
>>> On 15/05/14 12:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/05/14 14:27, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 14/05/14 11:23 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 15/05/14 13:09, Gary Dale wro
Ah, thanks for the clarification! But now I'm confused; in what sense is
it open source software if during runtime it starts downloading and
running binary blobs from Adobe? :/
On 2014-05-15 20:09, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-05-15 19:51 +0200, Eelis wrote:
I read[1] that Firefox will start
On 2014-05-15 19:51 +0200, Eelis wrote:
> I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they won't
> provide the source code (something to do with DRM..).
You read incorrectly, here is the relevant part from [1]:
,
| As plugins today, the CDM itself will be distributed by Adobe
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:51:09PM +0200, Eelis wrote:
> I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they
> won't provide the source code (something to do with DRM..). Can I
> trust that Iceweasel will remain open source, or will I have to
> switch to Lynx if I want to use an open so
On 15/05/14 01:51 PM, Eelis wrote:
I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they won't
provide the source code (something to do with DRM..). Can I trust that
Iceweasel will remain open source, or will I have to switch to Lynx if
I want to use an open source browser? :)
Cheer
I read[1] that Firefox will start shipping parts for which they won't
provide the source code (something to do with DRM..). Can I trust that
Iceweasel will remain open source, or will I have to switch to Lynx if I
want to use an open source browser? :)
Cheers,
Eelis
[1] http://andreasgal.com
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every brows
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 16/05/14 02:13, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 12:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/05/14 14:27, Gary Dale wrote:
On 14/05/14 11:23 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/05/14 13:09, Gary Dale wrote:
The FSF has just let everyone know that Mozilla and
On Thu, 15 May 2014 08:43:01 -0700
Gary Roach wrote:
> Note: I am running an Intel i5-750 processor and Wheezy with uname -a
> giving: Linux supercrunch 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.57-3+deb7u1
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> .
> .
> .
> Processing triggers for menu ...
>
> Setting up libgsoap2 (2.8
On 16/05/14 02:13, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 15/05/14 12:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 15/05/14 14:27, Gary Dale wrote:
>>> On 14/05/14 11:23 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/05/14 13:09, Gary Dale wrote:
> The FSF has just let everyone know that Mozilla and Adobe
> have signed a deal
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why
not use
it?
Debian is b
On 16/05/14 01:39, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Scott Ferguson [2014-05-16 00:49
> +1000]:
>
>> On 16/05/14 00:15, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>>> * Paul Pignon [2014-05-15 12:09 +0100]:
>>>
>>> [...]> > ... lsmod | grep snd
>>>
> snd_pcm 76785 0
> snd_hwdep 13189 0
> snd_page_alloc
Ahoj,
Dňa Thu, 15 May 2014 17:47:23 +0200 Aleksander Kurczyk
napísal:
> Hi,
>
> Try downloading it from the official repo.
>
> https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
>
It is not the best solution. There are small problems with kernel
updates, where the modules are not build automati
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have given up on Wine for running some of my Windoz only software.
> Too many glitches. I am trying to install Virtualbox and am getting
> installation errors as follows:
>
> root@supercrunch:/home/gary# aptitude install virtualbox
> The fol
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:16:07PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> I disagree again. The presence of DRM material is an affront to the
> open nature of the web. Mozilla's decision to cave in to the DRM
> crowd doesn't need to be echoed by Debian. DRM isn't a user's
> choice. It's the choice of the site o
Hi
You said your are in a 64 bits, but you has install the 32bit paquet so the
32bits linux-headers-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
Unpacking virtualbox (from .../virtualbox_4.1.18-dfsg-2+d
eb7u3_i386.deb) ...
Try to install the 64bits paquet.
2014-05-15 18:18 GMT+02:00 Filip :
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 08:43:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 08:43:01 -0700
Gary Roach wrote:
> Note: I am running an Intel i5-750 processor and Wheezy with uname -a
> giving: Linux supercrunch 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.57-3+deb7u1
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> .
> .
> .
> Processing triggers for menu ...
>
> Setting up libgsoap2 (2.8.
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not use
it?
Debian is based on freedom. Iceweasel exists because
On 15/05/14 12:51 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/05/14 14:27, Gary Dale wrote:
On 14/05/14 11:23 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 15/05/14 13:09, Gary Dale wrote:
The FSF has just let everyone know that Mozilla and Adobe have signed a
deal to support DRM in Firefox.
So did Mozilla - in fact they
On 05/15/2014 05:43 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have given up on Wine for running some of my Windoz only software. Too
> many glitches. I am trying to install Virtualbox and am getting
> installation errors as follows:
>
> root@supercrunch:/home/gary# aptitude install virtualbox
> The fo
Hi,
Try downloading it from the official repo.
https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Kurczyk
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:43:01 -0700
> From: gary719_li...@verizon.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Ver
Hi All
I have given up on Wine for running some of my Windoz only software. Too
many glitches. I am trying to install Virtualbox and am getting
installation errors as follows:
root@supercrunch:/home/gary# aptitude install virtualbox
The following NEW packages will be installed:
dkms{a} libg
* Scott Ferguson [2014-05-16 00:49
+1000]:
> On 16/05/14 00:15, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Paul Pignon [2014-05-15 12:09 +0100]:
> >
> > [...]> > ... lsmod | grep snd
> >
> >>> snd_pcm 76785 0
> >>> snd_hwdep 13189 0
> >>> snd_page_alloc 13052 1 snd_pcm
> >>> snd_seq 53391 0
> >>> snd_se
On 16/05/14 00:15, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Paul Pignon [2014-05-15 12:09 +0100]:
>
> [...]> > ... lsmod | grep snd
>
>>> snd_pcm 76785 0
>>> snd_hwdep 13189 0
>>> snd_page_alloc 13052 1 snd_pcm
>>> snd_seq 53391 0
>>> snd_seq_device 13132 1 snd_seq
>>> snd_timer 22767 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm
>>>
On 16/05/14 00:13, Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed Infinality font config in my Debian Xfce 7.5 which
> interrupts me from loggin in. Only a black screen appears which says,
> something missing from /home/can't_remind_the_rests. This problem does
> not persist for GNOME, only for Xfce.
Hi,
I installed Infinality font config in my Debian Xfce 7.5 which
interrupts me from loggin in. Only a black screen appears which says,
something missing from /home/can't_remind_the_rests. This problem does
not persist for GNOME, only for Xfce. Now what to do?
There's not problem if I do not i
* Paul Pignon [2014-05-15 12:09 +0100]:
[...]> > ... lsmod | grep snd
> > snd_pcm 76785 0
> > snd_hwdep 13189 0
> > snd_page_alloc 13052 1 snd_pcm
> > snd_seq 53391 0
> > snd_seq_device 13132 1 snd_seq
> > snd_timer 22767 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm
> > snd 61901 5 snd_timer,snd_seq_device,snd_seq,snd_hwd
On 15/05/14 21:31, Jaime T wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying out my 1TB Toshiba MQ01ABD100 SATA hard disk in three
> different sata-usb enclosures. I'm testing the size of the drive by
> viewing both /sys/block/sdb/size and by using "hdparm -I", and I see
> different figures for the size. Here are the r
Hi.
I'm trying out my 1TB Toshiba MQ01ABD100 SATA hard disk in three
different sata-usb enclosures. I'm testing the size of the drive by
viewing both /sys/block/sdb/size and by using "hdparm -I", and I see
different figures for the size. Here are the results:
1st enclosure (USB ID 14cd:6116):
/sy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread
Index]
Re: no longer sound on amd64 sid systems
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: no longer sound on amd64 sid systems
From: Elimar Riesebieter
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 18:18:41 +0200
Message-id: <20140514161841.ga3.
Hi Filip,
>
> You can simulate it on the command line with:
>
> $ dbus-send --print-reply --system \
> --dest=org.freedesktop.UPower \
> /org/freedesktop/UPower\
> org.freedesktop.UPower.Hibernate
>
Checked this and giving this command in a shell is working. So i
Mp3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/42b6be39-4704-464f-a47d-2382522a1...@gmail.com
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
> content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not use
> it?
>
> Debian is based on freedom. Iceweasel exists because Firefox contained
> proprietary p
79 matches
Mail list logo