On 16/05/14 04:51, Eelis wrote: > On 2014-05-15 20:48, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> On 16/05/14 04:35, Eelis wrote: >>> On 2014-05-15 20:27, Scott Ferguson wrote: >>>> Mozilla will be shipping an Open Source sandbox for the plugin. >>> >>> Ah yes, that's also an interesting point, because one of the blog posts >>> says: >>> >>> “Adobe and the content industry can audit our sandbox (as it is open >>> source) to assure themselves that we respect the restrictions they are >>> imposing on us and users” >>> >>> Would it not be possible for me (or anyone else) to create a branch of >>> Firefox where these restrictions are removed? >> >> No. >> Because there are no restrictions. > > No restrictions?
That's correct. It's a sandbox. The sandbox restricts the close plugin. *You* are only restricted in how you can *playback* media encrypted by the plugin. *If* you choose to install it (and why would you?). > I'm talking about "limiting the output to streaming and > preventing users from saving the content", part of the same sentence I > quoted. > See the bit that you quoted that says "open source"?? (sigh) I think you've trolled long enough now. Bye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5375123f.8040...@gmail.com
