On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, it can be and is configured by source package. If you can get some
> numbers to the buildd admin (James) about how long it should take for these
> packages to build, it should be straightforward to fix up t
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yes, it can be and is configured by source package. If you can get some
> > numbers to the
Hi RMs,
As you may or may not know, Firefox 2.0 and Seamonkey 1.1 are due at the
end of october. Thunderbird 2.0, on the other hand is due at the end of
november, beginning of december. While Thunderbird 2.0 would be hard to
get in time for etch (planned for early december), Firefox and Seamonkey
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:57:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060925 20:55]:
> > I'm hereby requesting an exception for both of these (plus xulrunner).
> > The main reason for this request is
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Seamonkey 1.1 is not yet in the archive, but is being worked on at the
> > moment and should be uploaded some day soon (well,
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reopen 385793
> severity 385793 important
> thanks
>
> > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java
> > build in this release makes them unnecessary.
>
> sorry, no. what you do here
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > reopen 385793
> > severity 385793 important
> > thanks
> >
> > > Remove
> yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do
> the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability.
Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more important
problems than that. And I'm not uploading every other day.
Plus, there are much less
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:06:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do
> > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability.
>
> Uninstallability on few architectu
Hi,
I forgot to push the urgency to high for the last xulrunner upload,
which fixes quite some security issues which are important for galeon,
epiphany, kazehakase, etc. users.
Now that it is built on all arches (except m68k), could you push it to
testing ?
Thanks
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:14:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able
> to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at
> the same time.
What about renaming it zen ?
Mik
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:52:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:14:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able
> > to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at
> > the same
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
> e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
> which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
>
> I guess a si
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:08:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > we (Steve McIntyre, Martin Zobel-Helas and me) discussed what is an official
> > Debian CD. Frankly speaking, we should be able to produce officia
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:45:39PM +0200, Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > So you have multiple machines on your local link that are running zeroconf
> > (or similar technology), as a result they can talk to each other using local
> > link addresses, and this is inconsistent with th
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 06:08:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:47:33PM +0100, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > You've missed the crucial steps:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache rdepe
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:47:33PM +0100, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You've missed the crucial steps:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache rdepends kdnssd
> kdnssd
> Reverse Depends:
> kdenetwork
> education-standalone
Then the bug is not in zeroconf, but in kdnssd. Why does a d
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:11:06AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> libnss-mdns recommnends zeroconf
> libnss-mdns recommends zeroconf
That was bug #353131 and was fixed in libnss-mdns 0.8-4.2.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
reassign 392590 libnss-dns/0.8-6
thanks
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:12:46AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 03:19, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:11:06AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> afaict there are currently no hints for getting rid of thunderbird and
> letting icedove in instead.
>
> remove thunderbird/1.5.0.7-2
>
> icedove has one rc-bug currently (#395095), it contains non-fr
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> (...)
> It seems this source package contains the following files from the
> IETF under non-free license terms:
>
> xulrunner-1.8.0.7/directory/c-sdk/ldap/docs/draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-05.txt
>
> xulrunn
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 04:13:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Does your question apply to *all* of the files mentioned in the mail you
> linked to? I don't understand which files you believe are non-free and why;
> some of the files mentioned are things like
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Does your question apply to *all* of the files mentioned in the mail you
> > > linked to? I don't understand which files you believe are non-free and
> > > why;
> > > some of the fi
Hi,
Please hint libxslt, which fixes FTBFSes on other packages. There is
rubrica on its way, which is still using python2.3-libxslt1, which
was removed a while ago per python policy... (#400344)
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hi,
I'd like to upload a new upstream version of libxslt, which is only a
bugfix released:
Upstream changelog reads as follows:
- entities within attributes (William Brack)
- Python detection problem (Joseph Sacco)
- in-scope namespace bug (Mike Hommey)
- Result value tree cachin
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:55:22AM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 08:40]:
> > All of which, except the python detection problem, have already been
> > applied to 1.1.18-2 and -3... which means there won't be
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:32:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:40:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I'd like to upload a new upstream version of libxslt, which is only a
> > bugfix released:
>
> &g
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:11:04AM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 09:07]:
> > rubrica depends on python2.3-libxslt which doesn't exist from 1.1.17-2,
> > released in July (and migrated to testing the
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:21:38PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:32:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:40:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell
> dictionaries
> then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team
> knows
> that mozilla needs to be reb
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There's no big difference in using hunspell
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict
> against all mozillas...
I fail to see why. Are the hunspell dictionaries in
/usr/share/myspell/dicts or what ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 06:10:16PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 09,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:53:59AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >> A fair number of conffiles have changed of packages.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Unfortunately, I know how to avoid
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:01:20PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > The only sane solution if you want to get quickly to a releaseable state
> > is to go back to the last 1.2.8 package and to backport security fixes.
> > I've also explained more lo
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like that we will get libpng 1.2.8 back to Etch, right?
> But one of my packages (optipng) needs at least libpng 1.2.9 (it needs
> png_get_uint_32 and png_save_uint_32).
>
> When version
Hi
I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take
as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ?
Should we go with newer upstreams (note there's no official xulrunner
release, but I fake them taking from tags in upstream cvs) or backport
security fixes ?
If t
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:49:26PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 10:16:12PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >Alexander Sack wrote:
> > >>On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hom
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:20:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take
> > as a course of action for xulrunn
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 09:50:22PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:20:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > > I see Alex
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A starting point would be packages of iceweasel and iceape that are ready to
> migrate to etch... I personally prefer having working iceweasel and iceape
> packages in etch soon...
>
> It will probably depend on the '
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 09:08:16PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 05:38:58PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > A starting poin
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2006-12-31 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 09:08:16PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > &g
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 2006-12-31 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 0
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:34:21PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I am missing a hint of urgency there. Iceape has been without upload
> > > for almost a month now although work in
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:03:58AM -0200, Fabiano Manoel de Andrade <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The totem-mozila version was 2.16.4-2. /usr/lib/firefox was a symbolic
> link to iceweasel directory.
> Fabiano.
This whole issue might be related to the fact that /usr/lib/firefox is a
symlink to
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:22:37AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> To my eye, I think it would be much better to drop the /usr/lib/firefox
> symlink. I wholly expect that people will want to install third-party
> firefox packages, maybe even alongside the iceweasel package, and
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:10:30AM +0100, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Just wondering: why shipping a Debian package at all if half of the work
> > remains to be done after installing it?
>
> Because I don't want to have a build-enviroment for the module
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Could you explain why qemu should add the device for something that is
> > remotely in relationship with it ?
>
> Remotely? I think qemu and kqemu are quite
Hi RMs,
Just to give you a status for the packages I'm the most aware of:
- iceape is at 1.0.7-2 in an almost releaseable state. At least, it is
(I think) in a migratable state. You may want to increase the delay
for migration to 20 days like for wesnoth. Anyways, there will be
fixes (like
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Hi RMs,
> >
> > Just to give you a status for the packages I'm the most aware of:
> >
> > - iceape is at 1.0.7-2 in an almost releaseable state. At
Hi,
I requested removal of cascades from testing a while ago[1] because
mozilla was due to be removed too, and seamonkey (now iceape) was not
yet packaged in debian.
Now that iceape is here and transitioned to testing, could you
transition cascades too ?
The only changes to the package since its
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:32:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > - iceweasel has 2 RC bugs: #404733, which I intend to fix this week-end
> > if I have enough time for it, and #405592, which sounds like a typical
> > flash plugin crash, and may be downgraded as soon as we
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:03:51PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I just uploaded a new version of hal which fixes an RC bug (#404937).
Why not fixing simple bugs that would also improve quality, such as
#391528 ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:33:38AM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>iceape (U)
This one is probably bug #405911, so you don't need to file it ;)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In that case, should the bug actually be downgraded?
It's already closed, I don't think we should care about that anymore.
It is still an RC bug for etch, but let's consider this RC as a bug
about all the securi
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > In that case, should the bug actually be downgraded?
>
> It's already closed, I do
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:46:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In that case, s
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:38:17PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> etch currently contains quake2-data 13-0.2, an installer package for
> quake2 data files, which seems to be rather useless if the actual
> quake2 engine is not shipped. (quake2 was removed from testi
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:57:29PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:38:17PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > etch currently contains quake2-data 13-0.2, an installer package for
&
Hi all,
I'm done preparing the next release of Iceape, fixing all issues I
think should be fixed for etch, except the icons that are still not
very beautiful, though much more identificable than before.
I'm currently building the package, but you can already take a look at
the changes in svn[1].
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:55:58PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm done preparing the next release of Iceape, fixing all issues I
> think should be fixed for etch, except the icons that are still not
> very beautiful, though much more
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:10:59PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:55:58PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm done preparing the next release of Iceape, fixing all issues I
&
Hi,
I don't know what happened, but there used to be a unblock hint put by
aba on xulrunner 1.8.0.9, and now it has finally been built on arm, it
can't migrate to testing because... there is no unblock hint.
Could you unblock it ?
Mike
PS: note there WILL be another upload, but it will be easie
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:02:50AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:10:09PM -0800, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > (cc requested please, I'm not subscribed)
>
> > Hi debian-release,
>
> > I noticed that the iproute package is priority optional. Aren't we supp
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:24:27AM +, BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Bug stamp-out list for -17 06:00 ps (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 541
> Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 0
> Number that have a patch: 72
> Number that hav
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openvrml_0.18.8-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu libproxy_0.3.1-4+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu gxine_0.5.906-1+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nm
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 04:02:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 17:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > On 01/11/2012 05:04 PM, in #655517, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > > When using version 1.10 or later of libcairo2 (e.g. from
> > > mozilla.debian.net's squeeze-backp
Hi,
Seeing how things are (not) moving for Iceweasel 9, I'm pondering what
to do next: Iceweasel 10 is due on January 30 and I would like to
promptly upload it to unstable. There is a major change coming with
Iceweasel 10: it will be supported upstream for more than 6 weeks.
The timing of this ext
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:16:43PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 10:41 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jordi Mallach (21/01/2012):
> > > Can you please schedule a round of bin-nmus of gnome-shell and gnome-sushi
> > > to ensure they pick up the correct libmoz
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hur
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:18:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
>
> Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
> [1]
Hi Steve,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
> memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds.
As maintainer of such a package that pushes buildds limits, I have a
question.
Isn't memory r
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >Hi Steve,
>
> Hey Mike,
>
> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> In terms of raw buildd CPU right
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:04:07PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > > gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
> &g
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:42:28PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 31/05/12 07:59, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > FWIW, it has been confirmed to be gcc 4.7 miscompiling. It is supposed
> > to be fixed in upcoming 4.7.1.
>
> The Mozilla bug report referred to GCC PR/53516. C
Hi,
Could you hint iceape so that it goes to testing sooner? I forgot to
bump its urgency when uploading (it is a security update release)
Thanks
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Hi,
How disruptive would an upload of iceweasel 23.0-2 to unstable be for
the release team? I would like to push 23 to unstable so that i can push
24 beta to experimental in preparation for next esr version (24 is next
esr), released in about a month.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:11:29PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 16/01/2014 17:36, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
>
> > quick heads up for everyone maintaining xul-ext-* packages:
>
> (CCing pkg-mozext-maintainers@lado then)
>
> > We
301 - 381 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
