On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 09:50:22PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:20:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take > > > as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ? > > > Should we go with newer upstreams (note there's no official xulrunner > > > release, but I fake them taking from tags in upstream cvs) or backport > > > security fixes ? > > > > > If the latter, alex, do you have a patch set for this ? > > > > Um, this is completely without context for me. Is there something the > > release team is being asked to comment on? > > > > I don't care about version numbers of things you upload to unstable for > > etch, I only care about what shows up in a debdiff. I think that policy is > > spelled out pretty clearly, or do you have questions about it? > > To make it very clear : do you prefer security updates or new upstreams > (security updates + version change + minor functional changes) ?
Considering there have been uploads of new upstreams for icedove and iceweasel, already... the question will actually be, will you refuse to push them in etch ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
