On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > It looks like that we will get libpng 1.2.8 back to Etch, right? > But one of my packages (optipng) needs at least libpng 1.2.9 (it needs > png_get_uint_32 and png_save_uint_32). > > When version 1.2.8 gets uploaded, probably optipng will FTBFS and I will > upload a new version statically linked against it's own libpng (version > 1.2.12), we will have another copy of libpng on the archive, the > security team will have to support libpng 1.2.8 (Etch's default) and my > copy of libpng (that just my package will use), I will have to listen to > a lot of people saying "Why do you link statically?", then I will have > to (try to) explain, etc etc etc. > > Do you have a better idea than statically linking against libpng?
Add png_get_uint_32 and png_save_uint_32 to optipng and link against libpng 1.2.8 ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
