> yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability.
Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more important problems than that. And I'm not uploading every other day. Plus, there are much less reverse dependencies on xulrunner than there are on gtk. > It's not an archive problem, please keep the project in mind, not just > the package. It *IS* an archive problem. It shouldn't put packages from different versions of the same source package in a single Packages file. That is, if it references version 1.8.0.4-1 of libxul0d, it shouldn't refer to version 1.8.0.5-2 of libxul-dev at the same time. > Reopened the bug report. The bug is not fixed. Is there a reason that > you do change it? I'm not going to turn the -dev packages to arch: any for the sake of it. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
