On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:06:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do > > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability. > > Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more important > problems than that. And I'm not uploading every other day. > Plus, there are much less reverse dependencies on xulrunner than there > are on gtk. > > > It's not an archive problem, please keep the project in mind, not just > > the package. > > It *IS* an archive problem. It shouldn't put packages from different > versions of the same source package in a single Packages file. > That is, if it references version 1.8.0.4-1 of libxul0d, it shouldn't > refer to version 1.8.0.5-2 of libxul-dev at the same time.
It's even in the BTS http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=246992 Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
