Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:17:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202688: fixed in tcpslice 1.2a2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:17:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#113259: fixed in tcpslice 1.2a2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:17:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#106208: fixed in tcpslice 1.2a2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:17:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156215: fixed in tcpslice 1.2a2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 106208 + fixed
Bug#106208: tcpslice needs newer config.{guess,sub}
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed
> tag 113259 + fixed
Bug#113259: tcpslice_1.1a3-1(unstable): fails to build from source due to time.h
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed
> tag 15
Accepted:
tkworld_1.4.0-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tkworld/tkworld_1.4.0-3.diff.gz
tkworld_1.4.0-3.dsc
to pool/main/t/tkworld/tkworld_1.4.0-3.dsc
tkworld_1.4.0-3_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tkworld/tkworld_1.4.0-3_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 228187 228259
Bug#228187: gtkgraph: infinite loop
Bug#228259: gtkgraph: infinite loop
Merged 228187 228259.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tkworld_1.4.0-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tkworld_1.4.0-3.dsc
tkworld_1.4.0-3.diff.gz
tkworld_1.4.0-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
pfe-dev_0.33.34-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pfe/pfe-dev_0.33.34-1_i386.deb
pfe-doc_0.33.34-1_all.deb
to pool/main/p/pfe/pfe-doc_0.33.34-1_all.deb
pfe_0.33.34-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/pfe/pfe_0.33.34-1.diff.gz
pfe_0.33.34-1.dsc
to pool/main/p/pfe/pfe_0.33.34-1.dsc
pfe_0.33.34-1_i386
pfe_0.33.34-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pfe_0.33.34-1.dsc
pfe_0.33.34.orig.tar.gz
pfe_0.33.34-1.diff.gz
pfe-doc_0.33.34-1_all.deb
pfe_0.33.34-1_i386.deb
pfe-dev_0.33.34-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
glotski_0.2-3_i386.deb: package says section is games, override says gnome.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wron
Accepted:
glotski_0.2-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glotski/glotski_0.2-3.diff.gz
glotski_0.2-3.dsc
to pool/main/g/glotski/glotski_0.2-3.dsc
glotski_0.2-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glotski/glotski_0.2-3_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 209645
Thank you f
glotski_0.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glotski_0.2-3.dsc
glotski_0.2-3.diff.gz
glotski_0.2-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:50:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:06:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: gtkgraph
Version: 0.6.2-5
Severity: normal
Type "x^2" as the function to plot, and set Xmax to 42 in the range
selection dialog box. The graph of the function is then made of
several parabola archs, presumably by incorrect wrapping.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstabl
merge 228187 228259
thanks
Le Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:18:20PM -0500, Raphael Assenat écrivait:
> In the Set Range dialog, if you set 'X minimum' and 'X maximum' to the
> same value, and there is a function defined (say: y=x), the program
> seems to start some sort of endless loop, which consumes a
Thank you for sending me your email. I really want to receive it.
In an effort to eliminate junk email, I am using Mailwiper.
Mailwiper has placed your message safely on hold.
Please reply to this email and send it to me so I can add you to my eMail
address book and we will be able to communicat
Accepted:
hwtools_0.8-0.5.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/hwtools/hwtools_0.8-0.5.diff.gz
hwtools_0.8-0.5.dsc
to pool/main/h/hwtools/hwtools_0.8-0.5.dsc
hwtools_0.8-0.5_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/hwtools/hwtools_0.8-0.5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 213006 21
hwtools_0.8-0.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hwtools_0.8-0.5.dsc
hwtools_0.8-0.5.diff.gz
hwtools_0.8-0.5_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nqxml/nqxml_1.1.3p1-2.diff.gz
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2.dsc
to pool/main/n/nqxml/nqxml_1.1.3p1-2.dsc
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2_all.deb
to pool/main/n/nqxml/nqxml_1.1.3p1-2_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your contributi
Accepted:
fda_1.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/fda/fda_1.0-4.diff.gz
fda_1.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/f/fda/fda_1.0-4.dsc
fda_1.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fda/fda_1.0-4_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2.dsc
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2.diff.gz
nqxml_1.1.3p1-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
fda_1.0-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
fda_1.0-4.dsc
fda_1.0-4.diff.gz
fda_1.0-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
zed_1.0.5-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/z/zed/zed_1.0.5-9.diff.gz
zed_1.0.5-9.dsc
to pool/main/z/zed/zed_1.0.5-9.dsc
zed_1.0.5-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/z/zed/zed_1.0.5-9_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 221363
Thank you for your contribution to
zed_1.0.5-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zed_1.0.5-9.dsc
zed_1.0.5-9.diff.gz
zed_1.0.5-9_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:58:33AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked through the differences between testing and unstable and
> picked out everything older than 100 days. Reasons why those packages
> are not in testing are:
>
> - non-free / contrib packages nobody tried to com
Hi,
I looked through the differences between testing and unstable and
picked out everything older than 100 days. Reasons why those packages
are not in testing are:
- non-free / contrib packages nobody tried to compile
- FTBFS or RC bugs
- possibly failure of the testing script to detect it
- othe
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
attachment.
<>
37 matches
Mail list logo
