Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2002 16:51:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 19 11:51:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sente.pl [195.117.126.124]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16ybbq-00043H-00; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:51:42 -0500
Received: from home.sente.pl ([213.77.64.92] helo=greg.home.sente.pl)
by sente.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16ybaZ-0002pS-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:50:23 +0200
Received: from greg by greg.home.sente.pl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16ybdD-0004iI-00; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:53:07 +0200
From: Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgdkxft0: Does not display iso8859-2 characters (iso8859-1 instead)
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:53:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libgdkxft0
Version: 1.5-3
Severity: important
After enabling AA with gdkxft in AAed GTK+ elements iso8859-2-specific
characters are not displayed properly. It looks like it displays
is8859-1 chars intead. If I disable AA - it's all OK.
I use GNOME, but it touches every GTK+ apps.
I of course tried to search google and gdkxft site if anyone else had
this problem - w/o success. I also asked on debian-user - no response.
Honestly I'd like to hope that's my fault, but it doesn't seem to.
Please tell me what can I/should I check. For now for me the severity
of this bug is important as it renders this package unusable for
iso8859-2 users, and probably for all non-iso8859-1 users.
I am using current unstable.
Waiting for Your answer
Grzegorz Prokopski
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux greg 2.4.18-p3lvmpe #2 nie sty 13 19:53:59 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.ISO-8859-2, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL
Versions of packages libgdkxft0 depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-4 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-11 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 143612-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 15:07:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 27 07:07:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AlUoY-00045f-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:07:42 -0800
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 986A026BB2; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:07:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CCABEFFA0; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level: ***
This package has been removed from Debian unstable: doesn't meet
build-depends, upstream not very active, breaks gtk2.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
