Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2002 08:37:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 28 03:37:36 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2.creditreform.bg [195.24.50.2]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17NrG3-0003op-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 03:37:35 -0500
Received: from amavis by mail2.creditreform.bg with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 17NrG0-0007Ei-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:37:32 +0300
Received: from pc1.creditreform.bg ([192.168.110.32])
by mail2.creditreform.bg with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17NrFx-0007DL-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:37:29 +0300
Received: from dam by pc1.creditreform.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17NrFv-0003Lm-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:37:27 +0300
Subject: libgdkxft0: Doesn't work with gtk+ 2.0
From: "Damyan Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.43
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:37:27 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libgdkxft0
Version: 1.5-4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream unstable
$ echo LD_PRELOAD
/usr/lib/libgdkxft.so
(as set by Gnome-AA session)
$ gnome-terminal
** ERROR **: Gdkxft requires gtk+ version 1.2 - this appears to be 2.0
aborting...
Trace/breakpoint trap
$ LD_PRELOAD= gnome-terminal
works fine
Including gnome-terminal in the list of bad applications does not help
This is already submitted on sourceforge as 558009
Some relevant packages:
libgtk2.0-0 2.0.5-1
gnome-terminal 2.0.0-1
thanks,
dam
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pc1 2.4.18 #13 ïí þíè 17 11:58:14 EEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=bg_BG.CP1251, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.CP1251
Versions of packages libgdkxft0 depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-5 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-12 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii xlibs 4.2.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 151245-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 15:07:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 27 07:07:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AlUoY-00045f-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:07:42 -0800
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 986A026BB2; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:07:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CCABEFFA0; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:07:30 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level: ***
This package has been removed from Debian unstable: doesn't meet
build-depends, upstream not very active, breaks gtk2.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
