Package: realplayer
Version: 7.0.2.2
Upgrading realplayer (apt-get upgrade), I got prompted to download
rp7_linux20_libc6_i386_b2_rpm. However, when I visited the web site,
I was only able to download rp7_linux20_libc6_i386_cs1_rpm.
So, I felt forced to leave realplayer unconfigured.
This mucks
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Package: sam
> > Version: 4.3-1.1
> >
> > /usr/bin/B is not executable (and also needs a man page).
>
> BTW, what does `B' stand for? I'd consider this as namespace-pollution.
B is the command which ad
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All instances of firefly.com should be replaced with orbits.com
[the firefly domain name was sold -- I believe to yahoo. Different
email addresses were grandfathered for different durations
but all will eventually be phased out.]
--
r this:
>
> (1) the package is obsolete: If the package still exists in Bo then
> it will still show up here. Just ignore the problem. If it exists
> in Hamm, then it should probably be fixed (see #2 and #3).
...
>ucbmpeg_playRaul Miller <[EMAIL PROTEC
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't actually process the name. It's just in the Maintainers file
> with that address. Was that package still in Bo, or is it much older
> than that?
Well, it's libc4.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Package: rc
[I want to become maintainer of rc, I've mailed wnpp about
this, but nothing's happened yet. Just in case someone else
is also working on the package, I'm enclosing a script I wrote
to properly find the include file which defines the signals.]
#!/bin/sh
rm -f .signalfiles .oldsignal
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug report you sent does not contain a description of the
> but. Please refer to the bug report and add some description.
> All you sent in was a program you wrote. It is not commented
> nor self explanatory. From what I see it mucks around with so
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, so as interim maintainer ai add it to the doc directory,
> install it in /usr/doc/rc and forward it upstream.
"ai add"?
Anyways, it's a linux-only fix, and the upstream maintainer hasn't done
anything with the source for years.
> > [But I seem to
Bleah.
Wouldn't it be better to put this code in one place, and have
the installation scripts just call it?
--
Raul
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 10:40:08AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be possible that all these questions may be
> > r
I think that the "hit enter to continue" items in the postinst (along
with a lot of silly config options) point at a real need which we're
not addressing properly.
I think one right way of addressing that need requires dpkg (or
at least postinst) support: build an installation message log.
Should
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > * It is not clear in the docs how meta-tasks are added, either
> > technically or procedurally.
>
> Tasks as meta-tasks are added by the QA committe. If you want to
> contact the technical committee, post here as we are reading
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:28:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> 3. Lynx is free and handles gopher URLs on a text terminal
Last time I checked, Lynx doesn't handle gopher forms. [Whether anyone
cares is a different issue. I suppose someone ought to check what
popularity-contest has on this iss
> > > 4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher
> > >server but there is no debian package.
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This was deliberate. [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client.
> > It's ano
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 12:57:49PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> When I worked on it for hamm, I basically packaged it from scratch
> (the old source format was ugly). I had intended to go back and get
> it to build the gopherd package at a later date, but I haven't yet.
>
> Hence it was not deli
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Jim Mintha wrote:
> I have been talking to Christian. The new packages of slang are ready
> to go. I have been waiting for other people to upgrade their packages
> to slang1_1.2.2-3 which fixes a dependancy problem. Most people have
> updated their packages
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 05:50:30PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Does anybody use 9wm, 9term, and 9fonts? Can we dump them?
I use 9wm (when I'm not using enlightenment). It's a decent wm for low
memory machines. I'm interested in using 9fonts but haven't spent the
time to figure out how to do so
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 08:24:40PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> 9term and 9fonts provide for the only UTF-8 (unicode) capable terminal
> emulation for X currently packaged AFAIK; it would be convenient to have
> them available for i18n testing purposes.
Know where there's any decent document
Raul Miller writes:
> > I use 9wm (when I'm not using enlightenment). It's a decent wm for low
> > memory machines. I'm interested in using 9fonts but haven't spent the
> > time to figure out how to do so meaningfully.
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 01:10:32AM -
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose I should maintain 9wm...
>
> Does that mean you will look at these bug at least as a QA member?
>
> [ Meaning it would be waste of time if
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:19:04PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Like, how can I use cat to put a 2 x 2 in a file (using the unicode
> > multiplication symbol in place of x)?
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> That is easier done using the Unicode tex
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
> No, it means that if you want to edit a text file (unicode text in
> this case), then a text editor is more comfortable than "cat".
>
> If you want to use "cat" then you will only be able to use the input
> method provided by X and th
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose I should maintain 9wm...
>
> Does that mean you will look at these bug at least as a QA member?
Anyone know how to find these bugs? bugs.debia
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 01:57:21PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> $ lintian /var/cache/apt/archives/dome_4.60-1.2_i386.deb
> E: dome: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> E: dome: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> E: dome: binary-without-manpage dome
> E: dome: binary-without-manpage dxftopov
> W:
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 11:19:53PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/l9wm.html
Thanks.
[Heh, it looks like I wrote all these bug reports. From what I recall
these all felt like race conditions.. I'm going to need to set up a
really slow machine to even have a chanc
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> And the /usr/doc/copyright issue:
>
> This is the Debian GNU/Linux prepackaged version of mawk, an
> implementation of the AWK Programming Language. dome was written by
> Richard J. Bono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> And the dome depends
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 12:49:24PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> My people have an old saying, "kud svi Turci, tud i mali Mujo", meaning
> "where all the Turks go, little boy Muhammed goes, too"[1] :)
Mine do too: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
;-)
--
Raul
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 03:42:09AM -0400, Mike Bilow wrote:
> For example, the 'mailto.pl' script dating from 1995 is mostly an example
> of how to crack a query string and exec 'sendmail,' neither of which are
> especially good ideas. As of Perl 5, the 'CGI.pm' module is a standard
> component an
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> > However, I disagree with the thought process which suggests that Net::SMTP
> > is in any way a replacement for sendmail. The semantics are totally
> > different (sendmail queues while Net::SMTP does not).
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:0
We're picking nits, so I expect that this will be my last message to
the bug tracking system on this topic.
> On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> > What is the advantage of introducing a complex syntax which is not
> > robust?
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 03:52:07PM -04
Argh... I hoped I was done.
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 05:10:21AM -0400, Mike Bilow wrote:
> My point is that running things from the console generally involves
> issues of trust, ownership, and the like. A "trusted user" has
> a particuar technical meaning for Sendmail. By contrast, SMTP
> connectio
I'd like to maintain hwtools.
Or has someone else already adopted it?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 12:27:08PM +0100, Mats Johansson wrote:
> I just played with irqtune and disoverad that teh files irqtune_mod.o
> and irqtune_npr.o are missing in the debian package. Laso there was an
> error that i cant figure out why it come up.
I've been looking at taking over the hwtoo
32 matches
Mail list logo
