On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Jim Mintha wrote: > I have been talking to Christian. The new packages of slang are ready > to go. I have been waiting for other people to upgrade their packages > to slang1_1.2.2-3 which fixes a dependancy problem. Most people have > updated their packages but there were a few more that had promised to > upload soon. As soon as 1.3.8 is uploaded those packages will break > (and since a couple of them and slang are all default packages this > means most upgrades of potato will break) I announced most of this > before.
Does this mean that the new slang package should be named slang1.3? If backwards compatability isn't maintained, what's the rational for keeping the same package name? -- Raul
